What Do You Know About Your Political Representative?

View fullsize

I am writing this post from the perspective of a UK citizen, but the sentiments expressed are applicable to anyone who lives in a country where you have democratically elected local political representation. IE someone who is supposed to advocate on behalf of your community or for you personally as the duly elected political representative. Here in the UK, the country is divided into 650 constituencies, each returning one Member of Parliament. Irrespective of whether you voted for your MP or whether you support the political party that they belong to, they are obliged to represent you and advocate on your behalf, if you request it. Such is the relationship in principle between constituents and MPs in the UK. It is important to be aware that your local MP is not a delegate whose sole purpose is to represent majority constituency views. Under the UK political system, an MP makes decisions on behalf of constituents and can take a position counter to local opinion, if they feel that is in the best interest of the constituency.

Towards the end of 2021 our local MP and former cabinet minister James Brokenshire sadly died. Subsequently there was a by-election and Louie French was duly elected. Old Bexley and Sidcup constituency is considered a “safe seat” for the Conservative Party, although it should be noted that their majority dropped by 20%. This however is more to do with the electorate's dissatisfaction with the government and the state of UK politics, rather than a reflection upon Mr French. As an ex-councillor Mr French has already experience of local borough politics and it would appear, judging from his website, that he is primarily focused on addressing the needs of his constituents. He is currently campaigning for increased local funding and is against cuts to local services such as transport, healthcare and local policing. This is further reflected in his contributions to parliamentary debates which also shows an interest in animal welfare.

At present Mr French is a backbench MP and does not hold a ministerial position. Hence it is perfectly reasonable to see him advocate in such a practical fashion for the constituency that he represents. However, Mr French is a Conservative MP and as such is expected by default to vote with the government on any legislation they plan to pass. As a constituent of Old Bexley and Sidcup, I am curious to know what views Mr French holds on the major issues facing the UK at present. Although there is “government policy” and the official “party line”, there is not a consensus on taxation, public spending, Brexit and the cost of living crisis among MPs. The Conservative Party is currently rife with factions across a spectrum of right wing views. It should also be noted that in the General Election of 2019 the party effectively expelled all moderates and centrists. Hence I am keen to know where Mr French fits into this political landscape at present.

View fullsize

For the sake of transparency, I am not a supporter or member of any UK political party and vote tactically. I don’t subscribe to trite, blanket narratives such as “all politicians are liars” or “they’re just as bad as each other”. Such comments are designed to avoid any difficult thinking, to opt out of any responsibility as a voter and simply maintain the status quo. I am sceptical but not cynical and like logical, reasoned debate, driven by critical thinking. I despise the “footballification” of politics and blinkered tribalism. There are politicians that I admire and respect on both sides of the house, which reflects my own broad and diverse political outlook. Thus I want to know where Mr French stands on the UK Online Safety Bill, the Policing Bill, Brexit, trade deals, taxation, the current wave of strikes, the future of the NHS and much more. Because I’ve looked online and I can find little or no information regarding these points.

Louie French had only been a MP for 6 months last year, when Boris Johnson was ousted from office as Prime Minister. During the tumultuous events of last summer, I did not hear Mr French express any opinion on the matter. Was he unhappy with the PM’s conduct or did he see no problem at all? It is important to know because for myself and many other constituents, the PM’s behaviour was beyond the pale. Hence we expected some sort of indication of Mr French’s opinion. He has already said he has no intention of being a “career politician”, thus I see no reason why he needs to be deliberately ambiguous in what he says. One of the things that I dislike most about contemporary politics is the manner in which many MPs refuse to commit to any position or opinion, for fear that it may “come back to haunt them”. “Cakeism” is self-serving and a sad indictment of character.

View fullsize

And so we arrive at the point of this post. What do you know about your political representative? Because I believe if you are the right person to represent the needs of your local community at any level, then I think you need to be transparent in your views. I accept that someone can change their views and am politically and emotionally mature enough to see that as a positive thing. When facts change it is logical to change your mind. I will also concede that on some of the more “complex” political and social issues, it is a valid stance to still be “collating” your opinion. But I won’t accept that it is reasonable to willfully avoid expressing a view or an opinion, purely as a political tool and a matter of convenience. If an MP is effectively “too afraid” to say what they think, then perhaps they should reconsider their career. I for one would not want to be represented by such an individual.

Therefore I think it is fair to ask your political representative what they personally believe in, so you can assess them politically and get a measure of their character. I would also argue that you also need to know about their business interests and affiliations. Naturally, my outlook will put me at odds with current political practices. UK politics at times strives to exist separate from reality and observable facts. It tries to be everything to everyone, while simultaneously committing to nothing, yet claiming the exact opposite. Hence maintaining a coherent position is an anathema and political kryptonite. Yet that is what I and much of the electorate want. Because if you don’t say what you mean, how can you mean what you say? I shall monitor Mr French over the course of 2023 to see if he does express a view on anything other than his established brief. I may even ask him, as one of his constituents. Sadly, I don’t feel optimistic about the outcome.

The End of Twitter?

View fullsize

I have been using Twitter since 2010 and to cut a long story short, although it can be a virtual septic tank of human bile, ignorance and stupidity it can also be very informative and uplifting. I rely on Twitter for the latest news and find it far more immediate and succinct than traditional TV bulletins. When the shit hits the fan, as far as I’m concerned Twitter is the way to stay abreast of a developing story. Furthermore, I very much enjoy the social element of Twitter and the online banter with those I follow and who follow me. Twitter doesn’t do anything particularly unique but it did it first and hence everyone is in one place. That makes it invaluable. Sadly, if Elon Musk continues to mess with things to the point of breaking the Twitter community, then I will be forced to go elsewhere. Some folk are jumping ship already. Because of Musk’s erratic nature there’s a prevailing atmosphere that something is going to happen and it’s not going to be good.

My biggest concern is that the existing Twitter community is going to fragment, with online friends migrating to multiple alternative platforms. It may also cause some existing Twitter users who are already disillusioned with the existing status quo, to simply quit social media. With respect to those Twitter accounts that I follow for news and information, rather than social engagement, I wonder what will be the new platform of choice to reach an audience. I don’t want to have to maintain multiple social media accounts across multiple services. And I am not going to pay for the service that I already have enjoyed free of charge for the last 12 years. The only people who potentially benefit from a fragmented community are the traditional media outlets. Print media in the UK hates the fact that Twitter provides a platform that can challenge their news agenda and give the public the right of recourse. 

View fullsize

I’ve always take a “belt and braces” approach to life and so, although it hasn’t happened as of yet, I am already working on my Twitter exit strategy. Anecdotally, it would seem that Mastodon is the next best place to go, so I have set up an account there. Unfortunately, this endeavour seems to have fallen at the first hurdle as I’ve still not received my verification email to make my new account active. This doesn’t bode well for a platform that some claim is the anointed successor to Twitter. Assuming that I can set up and start using Mastodon, there then remains the issue of which client to use. I currently use Tweeten for Twitter and am looking for identical functionality in a third party Mastodon client. However, nothing I’ve seen so far seems to offer that. It is so important to get the data that you want, presented in an accessible manner or else you run the risk of drowning in white noise and bullshit when it comes to social media.

I’ve written posts in the past about becoming reliant on free services, only to then have them withdrawn or monetised. We’ve all been down this road before so if the worst case scenario happens and Twitter goes to the wall, at least we won’t be caught off guard. However, the thing about Twitter is that there are so many potential ways you could monetise it without having to restrict usage or radically alter the way it functions. Sadly, that doesn’t seem to be Elon Musk’s intent. I am naturally sceptical of billionaires per se and especially so in his case because he is “anomalous” (the politest thing I could say about him). However, Twitter is now his “bat and ball” and so if he wants to neuter it for political or business reasons, then that is his prerogative and there’s nothing much the average user can do about it. If it all ends up going south, it was fun while it lasted.

Update: I managed to get myself on Mastodon and it is not an exact Twitter clone. It appears to require a lot more curation and interaction for it to yield the results that I want. Those seeking for a “like for like” replacement may wish to look elsewhere.

Another New Prime Minister

View fullsize

It is difficult to write about the state of UK politics with any degree of intellectual rigour when the entire situation has become so utterly farcical. My initial reaction to the recent departure of Liz Truss after just 45 days in office, was to laugh with abject scorn and derision. She was destined to fail due to utter lack of ability. However, there is still the outstanding matter of the country lacking a credible and functional government to address inflation, the cost of living crisis and resolve all the issues stemming from Brexit. There are problematic national and international events taking place that need addressing. A united, pragmatic and empathetic government is required to solve both these short term and long term needs. Sadly, the governing party is riven with opposing factions and there is no commonly held policy or underlying ideology. The PM may well have changed but the underlying flaws remain.

The new incumbent of No 10 Downing Street, Rishi Sunak, has achieved one major milestone. He is the first British Asian Prime Minister and that is certainly noteworthy. However, beyond this I see no other reason to celebrate his appointment. He may have calmed the markets by representing the traditional face of Conservative fiscal prudence but he has no new policy announcements. Effectively, he intends to carry on with the conspicuously nebulous manifesto promises of 2019 and will no doubt usher in “Austerity 2.0” after his predecessor left a gaping hole in the nation’s finances and undermined our capacity to borrow cheaply. He has said nothing to allay the immediate fears of those on middle or low incomes. Furthermore, after promising to bring “integrity and accountability” back to UK politics he re-appointed Suella Braverman as Home Secretary, after she resigned for breaching the ministerial code 6 days earlier.

View fullsize

We are still two years away from a General Election and even if there was one announced tomorrow, I would still struggle to find a political party that came anywhere near representing what I consider to be the nation’s political and economic needs. I would vote Labour only to remove the current administration and not because I am overly enthused by the party. Ultimately I and many other voters are politically homeless and the current “First Past the Post” voting system does not favour new parties. Furthermore, over the course of my lifetime the UK electorate has become increasingly politically illiterate and increasingly impatient, resulting in certain socio-economic groups voting against their own interests. It raises the question as to how much responsibility do the electorate bear for the iniquities they inflict on themselves and others by their political choices? Overall I am not optimistic about the immediate future and I am reminded of that line from Gremlins 2 about “put everything you've got into canned food and shotguns”.

A Sense of Community

View fullsize

I couldn’t settle last night, as I have the flu (care of my grandson), so I sat in the lounge and watched the live stream of Her Majesty The Queen: Lying-in-State. I was aware of the news reports of thousands of people queuing to pay their respects, but often with major events such as this there can be a mental disconnect between being told something and actually seeing it. Upon watching the live stream I was surprised and profoundly moved. It was 11:45 PM and there were still hundreds of people slowly filing through Westminster Hall, despite the lateness of the hour. Although an inherently sombre spectacle, there was also something very uplifting about the proceedings. It took me a while to process my emotions. Then I realised that what I was feeling was a sense of community. Something that is very rare these days.

The UK has become a very divided country in recent years, especially since 2016. Politically, economically and socially the nation is pulling in different directions and the fault lines are no longer along obvious party political lines. Public discourse has become very partisan and scorched earth. We tend not to agree to disagree, amicably. Rather we are encouraged to consider anyone with an opposing view to be our enemy. The North dislikes the South and vice versa. The class divide is still with us and the UK’s recent flirtation with populism has seen a resurgence in racism and other forms of discrimination and “othering”. At the heart of this negative storm are the tabloid press and their insidious poison that they drip daily into the public psyche. Hence the country has been ill at ease with itself for a while and there seems no immediate change on the horizon.

View fullsize

Yet “The Queue” flies in the face of all this. This steady flow of British citizens from all walks of life, united in grief and respect for the late monarch, speaks of a sense of belonging. Having watched several hours of the live stream from Westminster Hall there is something very positive about seeing a populace at ease with itself. People helping the elderly and the infim as they descend the steps to the North of the hall. Or offering a tissue and a kind word to those who are visibly upset. Showing patience and good humour when faced with the logistical problems of managing such an event. All of which speaks of a cohesive and strong sense of community. For once, one’s neighbours seem accessible and not remote. Is this feeling of national identity that my parent’s generation felt during their youth?

View fullsize

Another fascinating aspect about this event is “The Queue” itself. At the time of writing it is currently 2.5 miles long. The route begins on Albert Embankment, next to Lambeth Bridge, before winding its way along the Thames to Southwark Park. The route passes the London Eye, National Theatre, Tate Modern and HMS Belfast. There are extra toilets and water facilities on the way. The Southbank Centre, National Theatre and BFI Southbank are extending opening hours to provide refreshments and other amenities. More than 1,000 volunteers, stewards and police officers are on hand. Visitors go through security and those waiting will be issued with numbered wristbands, allowing them to leave temporarily to use nearby facilities. Government social media accounts provide regular updates on queue length and estimated waiting time. Overall “The Queue” is a logistical marvel and a microcosm of “Britishness”.

View fullsize

There has been a degree of controversy in so far as serving MPs and other “dignitaries' ' being able to bypass “The Queue”. Security issues are cited as the reason for this privilege. Make of that what you will. For me this event is a distillation of all the things I consider good about being British. I don’t say that with a sense of superiority. That’s not what it is about. What I see are people expressing respect for a remarkable women. Royalist and Republicans alike. I see a mature, diverse country. And for a brief moment, the partisan agenda that we have thrust upon us on a daily basis, has been sidelined. People are being supportive of each other, even talking to each other. It highlights how so much of the divisiveness we endure comes from the outside and has a clear purpose. I hope the sentiments and spirit of “The Queue” endures beyond September 19th. But I’m not optimistic.

The Death of a Monarch and Change

View fullsize

The death of Queen Elizabeth II on Thursday was both an inevitability and a shock. Something I similarly felt regarding the death of my own Mother recently. We all know that people can not go on forever and that age, infirmity and ill health catch up with us all. But no matter how well prepared you think you are for a bereavement, when it happens it is still a shock. The Queen was a constant in our lives. Separate from politics, she was a dignified, benign and very accessible head of state. She dedicated her life to public service and was a force for good in the world. Although a deeply private person her public persona became clearly defined over time and the public loved her. Even those who do not consider themselves “royalists” recognised her unique role in society and position on the world stage. She was, as so many have pointed out, a constant in an ever changing world. 

The arcane processes that govern the institution of the monarchy have now come into play and a new King has ascended to the throne. There will now be a formal period of mourning throughout the UK and a full state funeral on Monday 19th September. This entire matter currently dominates the national news cycle and has an impact upon public events and sporting fixtures throughout the country, as a “mark of respect”. As well affording the people an opportunity to come to terms with the death of the Queen and say goodbye, the situation will inevitably raise wider questions about the future of the monarchy. King Charles allegedly has plans for a far more streamlined institution with many minor royals stepping down from public life and public funding. The debate about having an elected head of state has also begun again, although I think that the general public is not ready or disposed for such a change.

View fullsize

Although I broadly feel that the current situation is unfolding in an acceptable fashion, I do have wider concerns. The transition to a new monarch has happened quickly and a sense of continuity is being maintained. The Queen has earned a state funeral and it is important both nationally and internationally that her passing is marked in such a way. But I worry that this hiatus in public affairs, such as politics and legislation, is detrimental to the nation. The UK’s new Prime Minister is not at present engaged with the pressing issues of the day. The news cycle is focused elsewhere so there is the potential for important stories, events and happenings to be “overlooked”. I am also concerned that the nation may make the mistake of retreating further into our country's past and notions of British exceptionalism, rather than tackling the issue that has remained outstanding since the end of World War II; what is the UK’s role in the world?

On Tuesday 20th September, the UK will return to a state of relative normality. The formal period of national mourning for Queen Elizabeth II will end and the news cycle, public affairs and national politics will return to “business as usual”. The national sense of grief may well be assuaged but the recent fix of patriotism will not magic away the problems the nation faces economically. If spring 2023 turns out as bleak as is predicted, what will the British public think about the potential cost of a coronation? I suspect that King Charles is already aware of this and making plans accordingly. However, that is all months away. In the meantime, I have taken time out to personally reflect on the death of Queen Elizabeth II. I shall not be making a pilgrimage to London but shall watch the formal funeral on the allotted day. I hope the event serves its purpose. As for the lady herself, I simply say “Westu hál. Ferðu”.

Time to Move

View fullsize

A new build bungalow of the sort we’re considering

For many of us, we live where we can afford, rather than where we would like. I have been fortunate in so far as I have lived in South East London most of my life. By London I mean Greater London, a collective administrative district, which comprises 32 boroughs and The City of London. Bexley borough is a typical “leafy suburb” in the commuter belt. If that conjures up all sorts of stereotypes then you’re broadly correct. This is a borough where the middle classes move to raise a family and seek their “forever home”. It is an affluent area with good schools, quality shops, parks, amenities and a sense of community. The average price for a 3 bedroom house in Bexley is £500,000 compared to a national average of £307,000 (according to MoveHub). However, despite the fact I like it here I feel the need for a change of scenery and think it may be time to move.

According to Reuters “London is the quintessential megacity: densely populated; intensely connected at regional, national and international levels; and exceptionally productive compared with other cities and regions in the United Kingdom. London has more in common economically with other megacities - such as New York, San Francisco and the Bay Area, Tokyo, Sydney, Auckland, Paris, Beijing and Shanghai - than with most other parts of Britain. Like other megacities, London’s population has boomed over the last three decades, hitting a record of 9 million in 2019, up from just 6.4 million in 1991, according to the UK Office for National Statistics. However, before that, the city’s population had slumped for five decades from a previous peak of 8.6 million in 1941, as inhabitants fled the city for more space and other improvements outside the metropolitan area”. I think this succinctly sums up why I wish to move.

View fullsize

London’s financial district

It is getting noticeably busier in Bexley. Half of the local park which is located behind the street where I live, was sold and has become a housing development. As a result the roads in the immediate area are congested at peak hours and there is much more noise throughout the day. There used to be a time when you went to bed and it was quiet. Now traffic and police sirens persist throughout the night. Changes in social attitudes mean that building work, gardening and other sources of disturbance start far earlier in the day. Due to the high turnover of houses in the street that I live in, there’s always one or two houses in a state of redevelopment. This means the road is always blocked by vans and equipment. The air quality is also deteriorating despite the Ultra Low Emission Zone being expanded. But for me the main issue is noise. It’s something I’ve become keenly aware of as I’ve gotten older and I dislike it intently.

So put it simply “I want to get the hell out of Dodge”. Hence, the plan is to now start provisionally looking to see what sort of home we can buy on our budget and where. The dream is to find a detached bungalow with two or three bedrooms and a little garden on the periphery of a village. Preferably with a view. However, we are not looking for complete seclusion and so for practical reasons we want to have access to essential amenities. Such as a pharmacist, doctor’s surgery, local shops and a few restaurants etc. I think the notion of moving to the other end of the country has finally been dismissed (sorry Blairgowrie) and I think we’ll more than likely stay within the Southern Counties. Internet access is also a factor. I have been fortunate to live in a part of the UK with good technological infrastructure. I currently enjoy FTTP and would like to maintain that.

View fullsize

Which county should we move to?

Sadly this process is not all “fun and larks”. Any sort of move means dealing with estate agents as we call them in the UK and they are not my favourite societal group. Already after doing some cursory searches online, I have found the process frustrating. Information is often withheld, such as floor plan measurements or specific details regarding heating etc. All of this is to ensure you register with the respective website and provide an email address. Plus an estate agent’s lexicon is often questionable, stretching the meaning of accepted terminology and phrases. However, setting aside these minor niggles, Mrs P and I now have to give this entire matter some serious consideration, this side of Christmas. If we do decide to move in 2023, I want it to be an organised affair and not some spur of the moment, descent into chaos.

The Importance of Humour

View fullsize

Blackadder (1983 - 1989)

This post is about humour. A subject that is very dependent on one’s personal tastes. I consider humour to be an extremely important facet of the human condition. I personally use humour as both a sword and a shield in my day to day life. I find such an approach invaluable to maintaining my sanity and a positive disposition. It is also a means of circumnavigating obvious disparities in power, be it social, economic or political. I also consider humour to be an important measure of a person. All the people that I’ve encountered in my life who have been bullies, intransigent, obtuse, cruel, bigoted and superior have lacked a sense of humour. If they ever claimed to have one, it has always been very much a one way street. Hence, humour is an important social tool. Something that I keep an eye out for during the course of my social interactions.

Life is filled with social situations of varying degrees of significance. I have a hospital appointment coming up soon in which I’ll have to meet different people in an environment I’m unfamiliar with. I will also undergo some tests which may be a little uncomfortable. Humour is a means to navigate such a socially complex situation. Self deprecating humour or a simple joke about the circumstances can put all parties at ease and make the matter more palatable. Humour is great for breaking the ice at parties, extending an olive branch and making up after arguments. As I said earlier, it is a social tool. One that you can learn quite early in life. Every class at school often has a clown. Sometimes these can be people who quickly become adept at using humour to socialise and establish their identity.

View fullsize

Something, something, pubs, beer and mates

Later in life, you soon realise that if you’re not what society deems to be “good looking”, then be funny instead. Teenage years are often quite traumatic and being the funny one in your peer group has advantages. Ricky Gervais states that there’s nothing funnier than your own group of friends and the humour that arises when you get together is contextually funnier than any material that he can write. However, being funny is not always easy. Sometimes you can try too hard or fail to read the room, so to speak. Where we all know someone who is genuinely witty, we similarly often know someone who never shuts up, can’t take anything seriously and ultimately is very wearing. Social media often flirts with a philosophy that evangelises presenting your “best self”. You can see this on YouTube videos and Twitch Streams. People striving to be a raconteur, or a quick fire comedian. Sadly too many fail, because humour is more than just telling a joke. It requires mastering techniques, reading situations and people.

Perhaps the most powerful aspect of humour, comedy and jokes is as a means of speaking truth to power. As a weapon against pomposity, mendacity and hatred. The venal are often thin skinned and hate being ridiculed or mocked. Humour in that sense is the great leveller. Even the Kings or the middle ages had a fool who was given free reign to mock all regardless of status. But humour comes with responsibility. Words have power and can hurt despite what the old adage says. Hence there is the ongoing debate about whether comedians should “ punch up or down”. Is humour disposed towards specific world views, political positions and ethics by default? Does humour always need a victim or something or someone to be the butt of the joke? Is there always some form of collateral damage in the wake of a joke. Humour is not a black and white issue these days and is subject to a lot of scrutiny from various quarters. The veracity of their scrutiny is questionable at times but it exists no less.

View fullsize

Taskmaster like many other UK comedy shows, has been “re-imagined” for US TV

Humour varies around the world with different cultures focusing on different aspects of the human condition. I see clear differences in humour between the UK and US. These differences often stem from how a nation perceives itself. American humour can be loud, brash and at times very pleased with itself. British humour is often self deprecating, passive aggressive and sarcastic. There are also boundaries that some styles of comedy will not go beyond. This raises questions such as “is there humour in anything”? I believe there is and that it comes down to context . You can use an appalling situation to be a vehicle for humour, without mocking the said situation. And then there is the perceived get out of jail card that if an alleged humorous remark is not well received, you simply say “it’s just a joke” and you are absolved of any fallout. This is a myth and a spurious licence for bullies.

Humour brings happiness. It is an incredibly restorative social construct. Laughter may not be the best medicine as the old saying states, but it does bring other rewards. Mark Twain said that “humour is the great thing, the saving thing after all. The minute it crops up, all our hardnesses yield, all our irritations, and resentments flit away, and a sunny spirit takes their place”. I certainly wouldn’t contradict him. Humour may very well be the great thing. It can be found in nearly every facet of life. 90% of men and 81% of women claim that a sense of humour is the most important quality to have in a partner. It is a skill used by all of society. From great leaders to those just trying to get by. Mel Brooks claimed that “humour is just another defence against the universe”. But for me personally, Simon Wiesenthal summed up humour’s finest quality. “It is the weapon of unarmed people: it helps people who are oppressed to smile at the situation that pains them”.

The New Prime Minister of the United Kingdom (Again)

View fullsize

Conservative Party has been in government in the UK since 2010. During that time there have been three Prime Ministers. Today we moved onto the fourth. After Boris Johnson resigned on 7th July, the nation has had to endure a tedious two month process in which the Conservative Party elects a new leader. That person then becomes the PM by default. Many readers unfamiliar with the UK political system may be surprised that a change of leader has not led to a General Election. That is because the Conservative Party still holds a parliamentary majority of 71 elected Members of Parliament. Hence it is still constitutionally quite able to govern, despite Boris Johnson being forced from office. Therefore party members vote for a new party leader who gets the top job by default. Remember that in the UK, the Prime Minister is not the head of state and does not have the executive powers of a President.

This afternoon the results were formally announced, although polling and market research has strongly indicated that the former Foreign Secretary Liz Truss was more than likely to win. That has now been confirmed. Liz Truss received 81,326 votes (57%) and Rishi Sunak received 60,399 (43%) on a turnout of 141,725 (82.6%). 172,437 Conservative Party members were eligible to vote. If you want to drill down deeper into the numbers Truss received 47% of eligible Tory members. Although she has won the election, it is not a decisive victory. Previous Tory leaders won by greater margins (Boris Johnson 66% and Theresa May 60%). Nor does she enjoy unanimous support from her own MPs, as only 113 saw fit to vote for her as leader (Rishi Sunak earned 137 votes), prior to the ballot being put to the party membership. According to YouGov, only 12% of Britons expect Truss to be a good or great leader, while 52% expect her to be poor or terrible.

View fullsize

To say that Liz Truss has some major political and social problems to tackle in the first month of her leadership is an understatement. Those of a political bent will be aware of her rise through the political ranks of the Conservative Party. The wider public are not so familiar with her apart from what they’ve seen in recent weeks. What they have seen is someone campaigning, not to the nation, but to the party faithful. Hence a lot of what Liz Truss has said has been showboating to the home crowd and politically tone deaf to the wider public. If you use Google to research the new Prime Minister the first thing you’ll find are all the gaffs she’s made in previous years that have now all become memes. If you set aside politics and judge her on her oratorical skills, charisma and overall appeal, she comes up wanting. Those who cry “give her a chance” are spuriously appealing to the alleged sense of fair play of the UK electorate. A quality the government of the last 12 years sorely lacks. It is current Tory policy to change any rule that stands in its way.

Tomorrow the new Prime Minister will announce her new cabinet and it will no doubt be a dismal collection of the intellectually bankrupt and the hopelessly out of their depth. I very much doubt if any of the major political challenges will be addressed in the coming parliamentary session. Real help will not come regarding spiralling energy prices, the Northern Ireland protocol will continue to be insoluble for a pro Brexit government and the ongoing skills and labour shortage, combined with ongoing lack of funding will lead to more public institutions collapsing. Inflation, low wages and rising crime could all contribute to a volatile political climate in 2023. So far, rather than seeking new ideas, Liz Truss has indicated an ideological retreat into Thatcherism, advocating policies and dogma that are no longer relevant in the current political climate. 

View fullsize

If you take the time to find and read the serious political pundits, not the client journalists found in the popular UK press, you’ll find a lot of speculation about how the Conservative and Unionist Party is heading for an electoral disaster in 2024 and potentially its own extinction. I sadly feel obliged to remind people that it is “the doom of men that they forget”. Logic and clear evidence no longer shift the political scales like they used to. At best I think a voting pact between all parties that aren’t the Conservatives, may prevail. Perhaps the next government will then be a coalition against them. However, the election is a long way off. Myself and many other politically homeless voters’ biggest concern is the human collateral damage that will be incurred while we wait. Sadly, there is no immediate light at the end of the tunnel and that it also appears to be inordinately long.

Photos

View fullsize

Every few months Mrs P announces to the world in general in a rhetorical flourish “we need to go through all the photos and get some printed”. What photos are these you may well ask. The endless litany of pictures featuring our grandchildren, taken by our son and daughter-in-law. These arrive via WhatsApp on a daily basis. Being of the Instagram generation our son’s family copiously document their lives and share it on social media. Conversely, Mrs P is from the analogue generation where photos must be printed and placed in albums. All pictures remain conspicuously unannotated so in years to come you can argue over who is in them, what year it was and where they were taken. And returning to Mrs P’s statement about getting them printed, that falls to me because “it’s all done online nowadays” and that is apparently my department.

Humans are unique in being the only species that seeks to document their lives. Photos provide a chronological history of our interactions with family and friends as well as our passage through life. Sharing memories is an important social ritual bringing both joy when times are good and comfort when life is bad. Plus photos make great evidence in trials and legal disputes but I digress. During the course of my life I have taken my share of photos, so I am not going to play some sort of “holier than thou” card and claim I am above this social convention. In the early nineties I bought a video camera and went through a phase of recording anything and everything that I did. Like most parents, we have albums full of pictures of our son and now his family as well. I still like to take pictures when I go out on day trips and because of my penchant for social media, especially Twitter, I will take a photo of anything that amuses me that I can share online.

However, there is one noticeable thing that has changed overtime regarding my relationship with photos. I no longer appear to be in many. In fact if you wander around our bungalow and look at all the pictures on bedside cabinets, walls or shelves you’ll probably only find me in one. Potentially this is because I was more than likely the person taking the photo in the first place but I suspect it’s more of a case that no one is really interested in me. If you show photos to friends and family it usually tends to be grandchildren and the things they get up to, or pictures of where you went for holiday. No one pro-actively requests to see photos of an overweight, middle aged white guy. Plus I’m not really keen on having my picture taken anyway. I don’t really buy into selfie culture. Why ruin a nice view by putting me in front of it? I’m far more interested in looking at interesting things and places.

I was recently going through my late Father’s possessions  and found several scrapbooks filled with pictures of his Father’s family taken when they lived in India and Burma at the turn of the 20th century. There was an accompanying piece of paper that numbered and identified all the photos. Sadly, the glue my Father had used to stick the photos into the scrapbook had dried out over time and the pictures all had fallen out, rendering the key useless. The descriptions written have allowed me to identify some (such as Great Aunt Persephone and the Archbishop of Rangoon, I kid you not) but others will now forever remain unidentified. Something that may eventually be the fate of my photos unless Mrs P and I annotate them in some fashion. Which reminds me I better log onto Snapfish and order the latest batch of family photos. We don’t want anything to go unwitnessed do we?

Retirement

View fullsize

My carer’s duties ended on April 7th 2022 when my Mother moved into a care home. I stopped claiming Carer’s Allowance (£69.70) from the Department of Work and Pensions and decided to take a few weeks to rest and consider what I was going to do next. Naturally, being 54 years of age, the most immediate consideration has been one of employment. We all need an income to survive. At present the State Pension Age in the UK for men is 67. This is when you will receive your State Pension, which is based upon your National Insurance Contributions that you have paid throughout your working life. That is 13 years away, hence why I’ve been considering returning to work. However, Mrs P took early retirement from the Civil Service seven years ago and raised the point that if I returned to full time work, we would no longer have so much time together. Although caring for my parents has been tough, it revolved around a schedule thus affording Mrs P and I windows of opportunity to do things.

With this in mind, I decided to investigate whether part time work is more viable? IT support and management, project management and short term IT contracts tend not to have part time options, so I decided to check out local work of a more general nature. I investigated vacancies in local government and small business. I then spoke to the staff at my local supermarket and newsagents to see what employment was available. The results were very interesting. If I want to return to most fields of IT it is not too difficult. Short term contracts such as a hardware rollout in a hospital or across a series of offices are paying good money for experienced staff, now that so much migrant labour is not available. But taking such work would mean spending extended periods of time away from home, which is not something I desire. The alternative would be to take a position such as an IT Manager for a small business, possibly in Central London. But that raises the spectre of commuting and again is more than likely to be a full time position.

View fullsize

Therefore, I decided to look more into local, part time work as this would theoretically suit my needs. I want to have at least two days a week available for me and Mrs P to spend time together. Financially speaking, the part time job would only have to pay a specific figure that I’ve worked out that I need to get by. However, the more people I spoke to, the more I discovered that is not how things work. Many do not get to work the hours that they want and tend to have little say when they do work. The pay is low, the workload excessive and the general environment pressurised and uncaring. One young man I regularly spoke to at my local supermarket said it was like being on a treadmill and akin to being a prisoner. There was little or no respite from the daily slog and he felt like an asset that was just there to be used when his employers found it convenient. This gave me pause for thought. Why would I want to do such work? Why would anyone want to do it other than out of necessity?

I have had good jobs in the past that I have earned through my skills and experience. I have undertaken them well because that’s what I feel is the foundation of the contract between myself and my employer. It is a civil and polite quid pro quo. But I have never seen my work as defining me in any way. I have worked in the past because I have to, not because I believe in “work setting you free”. There is pride in a job well done but I’m not doing it for a pat on the back. I expect market rates as well as competitive terms and conditions. Everyone should. Sadly, this doesn’t seem to be the default position of many employers these days. They want as much as they can get out of you and for as little as they can get away with paying. Plus work culture is rife with so much bullshit these days. Awareness courses, personal development, the pursuit of the company vision. And let us not forget the psychopaths, sociopath, bullies and the sexual predators that still seem to get through the interview process and climb the greasy pole. Fuck all that.

View fullsize

“ I’ve looked at the numbers and to use a technical term, you have fuck all money”

So having researched the state of the UK job market, I concluded that it either didn’t align with the lifestyle I was aspiring to or it was effectively a form of self torture that didn’t warrant the rewards it yielded. I then decided to consider alternative options so I spoke with a financial advisor. I subsequently discovered that due to change in the UK financial regulations, I could access my own private pension in December this year when I become 55.  From 1997 to 2016 I paid money into my own independent pension fund. The amounts were not always consistent and in the last few years of that 19 year period the payments were somewhat erratic due to me mainly doing short term contract work. However, I could access this money and contrary to my belief, it wasn’t as small an amount as I thought. This combined with other assets such as savings, meant I was in a stronger position. The financial advisor said “you can not work if you don’t want to. You’ll be able to get by”.

View fullsize

Retirement is just like this…

As you can tell by the title of this post, it’s not too hard to figure out what option I’ve taken. My Father worked hard throughout his life but he also extolled the value of leisure time. Like many people, the last few years have really made me and Mrs P rethink what we want out of the remainder of our lives. We’d prefer to get by and have time to enjoy ourselves rather than run ourselves into the ground chasing a few extra pounds. I guess this makes me an anathema to the likes of Dominic Raab, Liz Truss and the other authors of Britannia Unchained. But why should I kill myself making someone else rich, especially a socioeconomic group I despise. I am 54 and possibly have 20 good years left if my family’s medical history is anything to go by. I am going to live life on my terms. Therefore I am now retired and will remain so unless my finances or personal situation forces me to do otherwise. I hope that you can do something similar. Remember, you’re a long time dead.

Adaptation, Representation and Those Who Don’t Like Either

View fullsize

Lenny Henry as Sadoc Burrows

I was perusing my Twitter timeline last night and a tweet appeared from someone who doesn’t seem to care for the casting of Lenny Henry as a hobbit in the upcoming Amazon Prime TV show The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power. If you’re not familiar with Lenny Henry he’s a British comedian and actor of Jamaican heritage, who was one of first people of colour to establish himself as part of the cultural mainstream in the UK. He’s funny, smart and well respected. However, this particular individual on social media (we will not dignify them with a name check) was not happy about canonical authenticity being subject to the whims of representation. They tried to portray their objections as legitimate criticism based on a good faith argument, but some of the terminology they used clearly showed their true intent was passive aggressive dog whistle racism.

Setting aside twitter trolls, I’d like to briefly discuss the matter of representation, especially with regard to film and television. Simply put, representation is important. First off there are the moral and ethical reasons. Contemporary films and TV should accurately portray the world in which we live. Hence the diverse nature of society should be reflected both on the small and big screen. Furthermore, such depictions should be credible and fair. Secondly, representation is commercially viable. Paying audiences like to see people like themselves in the films and TV shows that they watch. Hence the success of the Blaxploitation genre during the seventies. Bruce Lee’s rise to fame also did much to make Asian actors and culture more accessible during the same decade. And if representation doesn’t matter, why does Hollywood continuously remake international films for its home market? Shall I also mention the commercial and critical success of Black Panther?

View fullsize

Films are commercial ventures. Directors and writers may well wish to talk about “art” but most major studios are in the movie business to make money. Films and TV shows are products. Representation increases financial viability. It’s as simple as that. So with this in mind, let us consider what happens when the rights to a major intellectual property, such as a beloved series of books, are sold to be adapted into a series of films or a lengthy TV show. The said IP will be repurposed to ensure that it meets certain criteria. These may include a specific rating, the inclusion of specific actors who have box office appeal, irrespective as to whether they are a good match for the part. And obviously representation is a factor. How exactly can a major production justify such potential changes from the source text? The key is the word “adaptation”. The bottom line is once the rights to an IP have been sold, all bets are off unless the original writer has some sort of creative control.

Hollywood has been altering plays, novels and other popular franchises since the film business started. Therefore, it is unrealistic to expect any adaptation of an IP that you enjoy to remain 100% authentic to the source text by default. You can make all sorts of arguments about why this shouldn’t be the case. For example, an author’s work should be respected and their artistic vision maintained and such like. However, such arguments seldom survive long outside of the rarified atmosphere of the classroom and tend to disappear upon contact with capitalism. The movie business is about making a return upon an investment and is not interested in philosophical arguments and ethical abstractions. If there reaches a point when the idea of a black actor portraying James Bond is deemed to be commercially viable, it will happen. Regardless of what the purists and the racists think or want.

View fullsize

Richard Roundtree as John Shaft

Returning to the matter of last night’s Twitter troll, what was noticeable was not so much their racist position which is tediously commonplace in fandom these days, but the way they lacked the courage of their convictions. They tried to represent their position as something it wasn’t. It wasn’t a good faith appeal regarding the sanctity of an author’s work, but just a cheap exercise in unsubtle bigotry. If you’re going to be racist, be upfront about it. As for all the other objections you hear when so-called fans aren’t happy about something, they’re equally as bogus. Despite claims to the contrary, no one can get into your head and retrospectively ruin your childhood. If you don’t like something, ignore it. Be an adult and rise above it. As for The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power, I hope it proves a success both critically and commercially. Especially if that pisses off all the bigots.

Caring for the Elderly Part 17

View fullsize

My Mother and Sister circa 1965

My Mother moved into a care home on April 7th this year. Her health was already very poor due to her age (91).  She was bed bound, partially sighted, suffering from increasing hearing loss and unable to feed herself. Rapid onset dementia meant that her behaviour had become erratic and she was a danger to herself. Hence her caring needs could no longer be safely managed within a home environment. Fortunately the care home proved a good choice. For the past four months they have provided outstanding care and have treated my Mother with dignity, respect and genuine kindness. Sadly, during that time my Mother had several bouts of illness that saw her hospitalised four times. Eventually a PEACE plan (Proactive Elderly Advanced Care) was set up allowing treatment to be managed by the care home and local GP. Since July my Mother has enjoyed a stable environment and continuity of care.

This Thursday I was notified by staff at the care home that my Mother’s health was declining rapidly and that she was not expected to survive the week. I went to visit her and found that she had lost even more weight and was very gaunt. She was not aware of my presence and was focusing all her efforts on breathing. It is a sobering experience to see a parent who was once so indefatigable and energetic, reduced to such a frail and pitiable state. But such is the nature of life and old age is often a process of numerous minor ailments slowly wearing one down. So I sat and held her hand and talked about “the good old days”. I recounted anecdotes from my youth such as how I set fire to the kitchen curtains as a child. I reminisced about the garden which was her pride and joy for many years. And I recalled the family cat, Sam, who she doted upon. I told her I loved her, that she was a great Mum and I appreciated all that she had done for my Sister and I. Our childhood was fun and our family home was filled with laughter. I like to think she heard and understood all this.

View fullsize

Last night, I received a phone call from the care home that my Mother had died, peacefully in her sleep. It was far from a bolt out of the blue. She was approaching 92 and has been struggling with very serious health issues for the last eight months. Death has been a factor in her life for the last decade as she outlived friends and relatives. Last year my Mother asked me to get in touch with the family solicitors so she could “get her affairs in order”. Hence there has been an irresistible inevitability to this week’s events. Yet no matter how much you try to prepare and reconcile yourself to the situation, when it arrives it hits you hard. My Mother, a constant in the last 54 years of my life, is no more. Part of me thinks this is unfair, but then I stop and think about the quality of her life in recent months and what she’s had to endure. To deny her “rest” would be wrong.

For the present, I must set aside my feelings and concentrate on the task in hand. I administered my late Father’s estate in late 2020 and early 2021 so I have a good idea of what administrative tasks lie ahead. I am somewhat relieved that my Mother decided to get a lot of her personal affairs in order last year, hopefully ensuring a smooth passage through the potentially choppy waters of probate. Then there’s the funeral to arrange and the rather sad fact that few people will attend because so many of my Mother’s family and friends have already died. This is the reality of an ageing society. Thinking ahead, I also suspect that this will be the final entry in this series of posts. Looking back over the last 16 instalments, I hope that my experiences are of use to those who are just embarking upon a similar journey. Remember, 3 in 5 people in the UK will become carers at some point during their lives. You’re therefore never alone.

Smile and Wave

View fullsize

“Smile and wave, boys, Smile and wave”

Let me begin with an anecdote. I was putting out the recycling for collection on Sunday afternoon, when a passing car slowed down. The driver then honked the horn and gave me a cheery wave. Being culturally conditioned to be polite, I smiled and waved back. The vehicle then continued on its way and I went back inside my home pondering who the hell it was who had just greeted me in such a friendly fashion. Several days later I still have no idea. This is not the first time such a thing has happened. In fact it’s a fairly regular occurrence. I was going to my local doctor's surgery recently when a lady in her late twenties hailed me and engaged me in conversation. I managed to bluff my way through our exchange and she departed in the same good humour that she began with. To this day I have no clear idea as to her identity or how she knew me. My theory is that she may have been one of my late father’s carers. But I cannot be sure.

I pride myself on being quite an observant person. I notice things. For example, if the grandchildren have messed with anything on my desk, I can tell immediately. My office window looks out onto the street so I tend to notice any changes or things that are out of the ordinary. I also have a good memory for faces. Names I tend to forget, but I am pretty good with faces. So I find it somewhat contradictory when I encounter people who appear to know me and I have absolutely no idea who they are. It is not as if I am oblivious to the people who live in my street. I am on good terms with both neighbours and the people close by. Yet this odd situation persists. I was going to the fish and chip shop a few months ago and a guy of a similar age to myself asked me how I was and talked about how he was having a new kitchen fitted. I managed to move him along politely by saying “don’t let your food get cold”, so he cordially wished me the best and withdrew. Again, who was he?

Maybe I look like someone else in the area and I’m continuously being mistaken for another person. It’s not as if there’s a shortage of overweight, white, middle aged blokes round here. However, I think this is unlikely as I’ve spent a large amount of my life living in this borough. I think I’d know if I had some sort of doppelgänger. Mrs P has a less flattering theory which I must admit, does seem to have some legs. Whenever we’re out and about, she will often start conversations with those passing by. She knows a lot more of the people in the area than me and will often reference them. “I spoke to Velma today. She’s not going to Sorrento this year as she doesn’t want to leave Barnaby alone”. I will then look flummoxed which will elicit a rolling of the eyes from Mrs P and a complex explanation about Velma being the one who lives 5 doors away who had a cyst on her ovary. Barnaby apparently is a highly strung Persian Blue. Allegedly this is data that I should know but for some reason I haven’t retained it.

View fullsize

Barnaby (not really, this is a stock photo)

I suspect that this may be a contributory factor to this phenomena that occasionally blights my life. I am not rude by default, having been raised to be polite or at least civil in everyday social situations. However, I am someone who is very much wrapped up in my own thoughts a lot of the time. I’m not a great one for small talk. If I may quote the 1970 film Scrooge, “it's enough for a man to understand his own business, and not to interfere with other people's. Mine occupies me constantly”. I’m a bit like that. During a lull in any conversation I will retreat into my own thoughts. For example, what shall I blog about today, where’s my Amazon order or what should I have in my sandwich? Hence, it’s hardly surprising that I am not paying full attention to the people that Mrs P is talking to. I guess the fact that I’m there makes people assume that I’m actually listening.

I suppose if that is the answer to this recurring issue, then I shall blame it on a degree of personal introversion. As I stated earlier I can be sociable and broadly speaking am so. But this is predominantly out of necessity. Being civil and polite makes navigating life’s social complexities a lot easier. During lockdown, there was a guy who would regularly talk to me whenever I went to the pharmacy. He was hardly a raconteur but it was courteous to engage with him. Who knows, perhaps the brief exchange was an important part of his day. You never really know someone’s personal situation. But I don’t actively seek out such social interaction, preferring my own company by default. Hence I may be the architect of these mysterious encounters and if I’d paid more attention I’d know who they were. But I really don’t see myself changing. Hence, I suspect more of these occurrences will happen in the future. And my solution is to just “smile and wave, boys. Smile and wave”.

"Doom Pill" Content

View fullsize

There’s an interesting post about “Doom Pill” content over at Indiecator. The thrust of the narrative was the wearisome nature of continuously bleak, fatalist and pessimistic content. You’ll find a great deal of such material on Twitter and other social media platforms. It is very akin to the “everything and everyone is horrible and we’re all going to die” content you find served up daily in the UK tabloid press. I certainly agree that being emotionally and psychologically bludgeoned with content designed to make you upset, frightened and angry is exhausting. Furthermore, the material that is being “reported” upon to elicit such feelings is all too often misrepresented, skewed or downright dishonest. However, “Doom Pill” content has no interest in factual accuracy or editorial honesty. It’s about clicks or in the case of the print media, circulation.

Bearing this in mind, it seems unreasonable for me to berate anyone who mutes certain subjects or people on social media or who opts out of continual exposure to such material. “Doom Pill” content and “Doomscrolling” is “people vocalising doubts and spreading fear and fatalism” for no good reason other than they can, to quote Dan from his aforementioned post. However, I am concerned that choosing to avoid “Doom Pill” content can potentially foster a mindset that can ultimately make us averse to any thing that we don’t care for. Shutting your eyes to avoid the scary monster that is loose on the streets, doesn’t afford you any real protection from it. I’m not necessarily advocating attempting to tackle the beastie head on. Best leave that to the professionals. But forewarned is forearmed. Therefore, have a quick butchers, before you run off. (That’s have a look before strategically withdrawing for those unfamiliar with UK slang).

Facts are neither negative nor positive. They are simply a statement of reality as we currently understand it. Fear, upset and disquiet stem not from the facts themselves but how we or others choose to react to them. Being scientifically candid about the state of global warming is not what I would classify as “Doom Pill” content. Nor is having a practical discussion of the consequences of the reversal of Roe v Wade in the US. Listing the current benefits of Brexit or lack thereof is also not an act of deliberated scaremongering. Sadly, the ability to tackle difficult issues in an intellectual manner devoid of hyperbole, showboating and partisan politics is becoming increasingly hard. Sections of the media and the public seem to be either incapable or unwilling to do so.

View fullsize

It is important to look after one’s own mental well being. Especially in today’s climate where many institutions seem ill disposed to do so and prefer to do the opposite. But I would also argue that like physical strength, it is important to develop one’s emotional fortitude. Human history is predicated upon change and the change we seem to currently be embarking upon is not necessarily for the better. We live in challenging times. Furthermore, there are many institutions and bodies that are opposed to altering the status quo, thus making matters more difficult. Politics is acrimonious with no conception of seeking a consensus or the middle ground. It’s a shit show out there and it’s part of a deliberate plan to try and spook you, browbeat you into submission and withdraw from the fight. Don’t let them.

Blockade85 wrote yesterday with regard to the situation in the US “I’m angry, and I don’t know what to do. I can’t organise a protest, certainly not here. Too many people here LIKE what just happened. Now, I’m lost. We lost. Everything lost”. At first glance that does seem to be the case. But if you look on social media you’ll soon find that there are lots of people who feel the same and they’re talking about what to do next. You don’t have to be the next Doctor King or Peter Tatchell to play a part. There are a lot of different ways to get involved. Sometimes showing support or retweeting a message is a useful contribution. Letting others know they’re not alone helps. My fear is “ Doom Pill” content and the associated philosophy is being weaponised to keep people out of certain fights. A ploy to kill hope. Fuck that. Look after yourself mentally but don’t allow others to play upon such concerns, so that you end up sidelining yourself. Don’t let a fatigue of “Doom Pill” content kill your legitimate need to know what is actually going on.

Partygate

View fullsize

I try to keep my thoughts on political matters to a minimum here at Contains Moderate Peril, mainly because UK politics and the current state of discourse associated with it has become an absolute shit show in recent years. Brexit broke traditional politics and has made matters far more tribal and partisan. The two main parties have declined from having clear ideologies, identities and manifestos, to becoming either a lobby group for the specific demographic group that supports them, or a conflicted, divided and schizoid shadow of its former self. I’ll let you work out which is which. Politics is no longer about governing a nation for the benefit of all its citizens. Now you simply pick a side and join the ongoing culture war against everyone and everything else. This rotten system produces rotten leaders. Hence, when Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson became Prime Minister in December 2019, it was clear that the nation was taking a major risk on such a man. His failings as a politician and a person are a matter of public record for anyone who has the eyes to see them.

Over the last 2 years, Johnson has overseen a litany of political failures. Sadly, the only people with the power to remove him from office are his own MPs. The Conservative party has a long and established history of regicide. They will circle the wagons and defend their leader without question in a crisis, until it becomes clear that the aforementioned leader is an electoral liability and they could lose their own seats. Then the knives are unsheathed, as Margaret Thatcher, John Major, William Hague, Iain Duncan Smith and Michael Howard all found out. However, Johnson is proving to be the most slippery of eels. The fact that there is no clear successor is an invaluable get out of jail card for the PM. The UK is also in the midst of a major cost of living crisis, there’s a war in Europe and the government is about to embark upon a trade dispute with the EU. All of which are sound reasons why no one possibly wants the job at present. However, there’s one scandal that just doesn’t want to go away, like a wayward stool in an avocado coloured, seventies toilet. Partygate.

For those who live outside of the UK who may not be fully up to speed with this issue, I’ll try my best to summarise. If you wish for more detail, then do watch this video from last month by BBC journalist Ros Atkins. From March to December 2020, the UK was subject to some very stringent COVID-19 restrictions. In the run up to Christmas, there were concerns about a resurgence of the virus, so the rules governing social distancing, gatherings and general interaction were tightened. Simply put, people could not meet friends and families, socialising was out of the question and the idea of traditional Christmas celebrations were out of the question. People could not visit sick and dying relatives in hospitals. Funerals were heavily restricted. UK citizens made major personal sacrifices for the greater public good. Unlike the Prime Minister, his staff and various other Cabinet Ministers who broke their own rules as they partied and fraternised. Johnson is far from a complicated individual. He likes to be perceived as a “good guy” and “fun”. Hence, he brought a “play hard” culture with him when he took office. He sadly neglected the “work hard” part.

Now if you are a hardened cynic or feel disposed towards being politically obtuse, you may ask “is this really such a big deal. It’s just a party”. To which I would reply, it wasn’t one there were over a dozen and at least 8 have been subject to a Police investigation resulting in 126 fines, including the Prime Minister himself. But the parties are in many respects a misdirection. To quote Bruce Lee “it is like a finger pointing away to the moon. Don't concentrate on the finger or you will miss all that heavenly glory”. The biggest issue stemming from so-called Partygate is the Prime Minister denying any malfeasance. On multiple occasions, Johnson stated categorically in the House of Commons that there were no parties and all COVID-19 related regulations were followed. Yet he was fined for attending his own birthday party. Something he has justified by claiming he didn’t know it was a party. Let us take a moment to reflect upon this state of affairs. Johnson has denied any wrongdoing time and time again. Yet he is now the only ever serving UK Prime Minister to receive a fine for breaking the law. Laws that he oversaw through Parliament.

View fullsize

Today, after last week’s announcement by the Metropolitan Police that no further criminal action would be taken against the Prime Minister, several photographs have reached ITV News showing Johnson attending what any sane person would classify as a party. The photo shows at least 7 guests, the PM and were taken by an official photographer. 9 people in a room drinking and clearly socialising, with 6 open bottles of alcohol in view. 7 if they also drank the hand sanitiser. Naturally like all modern digital photos, it contains data pertaining to where and when it was taken. Allegedly that was on November 13th 2020. On 8th December 2020, Labour MP Catherine West asked the Prime Minister in the Commons if a party had taken place in Downing Street on 13th November. Johnson replied “No - but I am sure that whatever happened, the guidance was followed and the rules were followed at all times”. Was this a lie and a clear example of the PM misleading Parliament? Something that has always been considered a resigning offence.

The scandal that is Partygate has been rumbling on since December 2021. The continual drip, drip of information, photos and tip offs grew to the point where it was dominating the political agenda by the end of January this year. Hence Johnson appointed senior civil servant Sue Gray, Second Permanent Secretary in the Cabinet Office, to investigate the matter. Her report has already been delayed once, when in February the Metropolitan Police retrospectively decided to investigate the alleged lockdown infractions. However, her report is due to be published this week and will certainly ensure that the story once again dominates the headlines. Already, several important questions have emerged, prior to its publication. Why did Ms Gray meet with the PM to discuss the report last week? Although Johnson is Ms Gray’s boss, is it appropriate for these parties to meet without the minutes of that meeting being fully disclosed? And why have the Metropolitan Police fined people who attended the party in the picture published today but have not sanctioned the PM for a second time?

View fullsize

A politician's relationship with the truth is often a strained one. However, the role of Prime Minister requires that basic standards are adhered to. For want of another phrase you have to be “sound”, in the Yes Minister and Yes Prime Minister sense of the word. The UK is still a major player on the international stage although that soft power is fast evaporating. A Prime Minister has to be considered trustworthy by their international allies as well as their own electorate. They have to uphold the rule of law and their word must be considered bond. A proven liar cannot do such things and is a calamity for both domestic and international politics. A democracy in which the truth is openly scorned and deemed an impediment is a broken democracy. Sadly, this is where the UK currently stands. If Johnson remains in office then the only remaining route is down. However, the Gray Report may be a scandal too far. There are two By-elections coming up and if the Conservatives lose these seats there may be repercussions for the PM from his own party. I suspect that the PM is in an extremely uncomfortable position at present, both politically and personally. Has good fortune finally deserted him? I do hope so.

Losing Weight

View fullsize

I weighed myself this morning before writing this post. As of 6:05 AM today I weigh 188 lbs (13 stone 6 lbs or 85.3 kg). To give this data some sort of context I am 5’11 tall and 54 years old. Prior to my more recent weight gain, I have had an athletic build for most of my life. During my twenties and thirties, while I was still a smoker, my weight stayed around 133 lbs. When I quit my 30 a day cigarette habit I gained about 14 lbs or so over the following months and then stayed at that weight for a further decade. Even with the onset of middle age my weight has not been excessive and my build has accommodated any gain quite well. It has only been over the last 5 years that it has increased to a level that I consider to be neither flattering or healthy. This was brought home to me a few days ago when I saw my reflection in a mirror while on holiday. The incident has given me pause for thought and galvanised me to take action.

To cut a long story short my excess weight has all gone on the front of my chest and my neck has thickened. My arms, legs and butt seem to have avoided this process. Currently, my profile is somewhere between Alfred Hitchcock and Mr. Greedy. Hence, bending down is difficult due to this bulk physically being in the way. The excess weight is also slowing me down and I find myself getting breathless when exerting myself. Shirts, T-shirts and jackets are now tight across my chest, restricting my breathing and generally contributing to an ongoing feeling of being uncomfortable. I was diagnosed last year with an irregular heartbeat and I’m sure my increase in weight has contributed to this. Setting aside the obvious health benefits of losing weight, I just don’t like the way I look at present. The world has no shortage of overweight, middle aged white guys and I don’t wish to add to their numbers.

View fullsize

I have always enjoyed my food, a habit I inherited from my father. I look forward to meals and consider them as something to relish, rather than just an arbitrary intake of bodily fuel. However, it is clear to me now that in recent years I have fallen into the trap of recreational eating and to a degree comfort eating. And it would be remiss of me not to state how much alcohol contributes to weight gain. Effectively since the first lockdown in 2020, I have treated day to day life like one continuous bank holiday, with regard to my drinking habits. I don’t think I have a drinking problem in any way. I just enjoy a social pint and drinking is an integral part of the UK cultural landscape. But I need to address this and will be abstaining from all forms of booze till the end of the month. I suspect that this may well be a key factor in any weight loss regime.

Like most things I do in life, I shall be working to a plan. Hence I will be logging meals and adjusting portion sizes. I will maintain a three meal a day regime with a moratorium on eating after 8:00 PM. I’ll use the existing health app on my phone (that goes with my smartband) to track my weight. I tend to adhere to processes and schedules more efficiently if I “gamify” them. Furthermore, I shall post my progress here as I find that writing about the various things going on in my life helps me process them. To clarify my goals, I am looking to lose initially 14 lbs (1 stone, 6.3 kg). If this is achieved easily and in a relatively short period of time (perhaps by the end of August), I may then set myself an additional target if I feel there is scope for further healthy weight loss. As ever I welcome comments and opinions, especially from those who are currently embarking upon a similar weight loss plan. If you are, then good luck.

“I’m Entitled to My Opinion and It Should Be Respected”

View fullsize

One of the most curious aspects of the modern corporate culture is the need for businesses  to present some sort of ethical persona to their customers and the wider market. It is contradictory to say the least to watch such institutions that are by their very nature predatory, espouse a moral stance on social issues such as climate change and equality. Yet, this is something they do regularly, with a straight face and a tin ear. The recent leak of a draft document by SCOTUS to overturn Roe v. Wade has seen several companies take a stance and release press statements both externally and internally. However, an email sent to Sony staff by PlayStation CEO Jim Ryan, has proven more interesting than others. This is mainly due to Ryan reiterating a common “informal fallacy”; that everyone is entitled to their opinion and by default that opinion should be respected.

Ryan stated that Playstation employees, as well as customers are a “multi-faceted and diverse” community who hold “many different points of view”. He went on to say that staff and the company “owe it to each other and to PlayStation’s millions of users to respect differences of opinion among everyone in our internal and external communities. Respect does not equal agreement. But it is fundamental to who we are as a company and as a valued global brand”. The logical flaws in this statement stand out like a sore thumb and it would appear that critical thinking and constructing a sound argument are not part of Jim Ryan’s executive skill set. Mind you, such things are conspicuously absent from our politics and public discourse as well, so why should big business be any different?

View fullsize

Plato established a difference between personal opinion or a commonly held belief (doxa) and provable knowledge (episteme) in his theory of forms, over 2,000 years ago. It is still a viable distinction today.  A personal opinion is subjective and often uncertain due to reliance upon interpretation, feelings and other nebulous factors. 1+1=2 is a fact that can be clearly proven. In most functioning democracies, all citizens have a right to hold an opinion irrespective of its veracity or rectitude. But that does not mean that one has a right not to have one’s opinion challenged. There is no legal, ethical or logical obligation to respect another’s opinion. Why for example, should any respect, courtesy or deference be extended to a view couched in bigotry and prejudice? Also why should an opinion that cannot be backed up by facts to establish its validity or merit be afforded some sort of protected status?

All too often the claim that “I’m entitled to my opinion and it should be respected” or similarly, “let us agree to disagree” is a means to try and avoid scrutiny and to account for one’s view. It is a petulant and churlish demand that one’s view is given equal consideration with one that can be substantiated. It seeks to establish false equivalence and if denied, often prompts claims of victimhood. It is the faux argument of choice by those that want to compete with knowledge and expertise, without doing the necessary “due diligence”. Too many people conflate losing an argument with losing the right to argue. Obviously in the case of Jim Ryan’s comments, calls to respect differing opinions is also about “cakeism”; trying to please all customers regardless of their perspective. It is not only an intellectually bankrupt stance but a cynical one. Sadly that seems to be a prevailing trait of modern corporate ideology.

The Problem With Online Reviews

View fullsize

I recently broke the “free loop” on my smartband strap (and yes, I had to look that up to find the proper terminology). A quick search on Amazon verified that replacements were easily available. However, I couldn’t find any made by the manufacturer, Huawei, so I then started trawling through the third party clones. I narrowed the choice down to about three and then read their associated “reviews” made by those who may or may not (more on the latter shortly) have bought them. You wouldn’t think that something as innocuous as a silicon watch strap could engender such opprobrium and outrage. But apparently they do. As do so many other products and services. Hence the title of this post and my assertion that most online reviews are redundant. Perhaps it would be prudent to add a tenth level of hell to Dante’s Inferno which addresses this sorry issue. 

I am going to compliment all of us by assuming that we all know exactly what the function of a product or service review is. Sadly, it is clear by the reviews and comments left on so many sites such as Amazon, Argos, Curry’s and many, many other online retailers that a lot of people don’t. For example, I see no correlation between the font used on a product’s packaging and its ability to perform the function for which it is created. Yet I have seen reviews that suggest this. I have also read reviews for the most trivial of products that have somehow managed to enrage the customer to levels comparable to a Klingon Blood Feud. Exactly how a poorly made, novelty coaster can be seen as a slur on your honour and that of your Shaolin Temple is beyond me. Yet you’ll find these sorts of reviews and comments everywhere. When I was last at the Science Museum in London, someone had left a strident complaint in the visitors book (in capital letters) that it was all a bit too “sciency”.

View fullsize

Now there is scope for this post to become a sprawling catalogue of amusing anecdotes but I don’t think that is really necessary to validate my point. In principle, allowing customers an option to leave feedback about the products they’ve bought is a sound idea. It is sadly hamstrung by the reality that those who feel most disposed to avail themselves of such services, are often those least equipped to do so. Naturally, you have to allow for a percentage of comments that are just pure trolling. However, if you filter those out, you still find a wealth of irate customers who seem to feel that they have been actively conspired against. Upon reflection, such comments and reviews paint a very worrying picture of our society. It brings into question such things as the state of critical thinking, emotional literacy and appropriate behaviour in our wider society.

A lot of people certainly do seem to have unrealistic expectations regarding the products they buy. Is it wise to presume commensurate standards between buying a laptop and buying a multipack of fat balls for your bird feeder. Also, mass production always has scope for some items to fail quality control. If you are unfortunate to have a broken item delivered is it really likely that the manufacturers planned this like a Bond villain in a volcano lair? Is wishing death and damnation to all associated with the company until the tenth generation, really an appropriate response? And then there are those people who happily admit that they haven’t bought the product in question but feel compelled to join in, get involved and “contribute” to the discussion. This particular group worries the hell out of me and seems to be a direct result of the 24/7 society and the way we are driven towards continuous engagement, whether we wish it or not.

View fullsize

I managed to choose a new strap, despite the various comments that the manufacturers were “utter bastards” and that the product was not handmade from the finest materials and brought to my door on a silver platter. I worked out how to attach it without resorting to using a bread knife to saw it off, as one review complained. So far the strap has not presented any problems. If it lasts a year it will have merited its £5 cost. Have I learned a lesson as a result of this experience? Yes I have. I am not going to totally ignore user reviews and comments in future. But I will use any filter function judiciously. “Sort by relevance” is quite effective. If they want to add a means to ignore all crazy comments, I’d happily embrace that functionality. In a modern democracy it is hard to stop the “furiously hard of thinking” from expressing their views. I’d rather not play to their fears of being “cancelled”. But if I can mute their existence during my online experiences I’d consider that a win.

Why I'm Not Leaving Twitter

View fullsize

A lot of people seem to be concerned about Elon Musk buying Twitter. Apparently the billionaire, who describes himself as a “free speech absolutist”, considers the social media platform to be a “digital town square where matters vital to the future of humanity are debated”. Really? I’ve obviously missed all that, unless it’s being done through the use of cat videos. Setting aside Musk’s penchant for hyperbole, legitimate concerns have been raised by various Human Rights groups regarding the new owner’s intent to reduce moderation on Twitter. Also will previously suspended accounts be reactivated? Hence, even in my quiet backwater of Twitter, I’ve seen several discussions about whether people should leave and a lot of concern for what is to come in the weeks and months ahead.

For starters, let’s address some of the pachyderms that accompany this situation. Elon Musk is a “curious” character. His perception and personal experience of the nature of free speech will most certainly be different to ours, due to his wealth and power. Remember his “pedo guy” comments? He’s also a thin skinned individual who has often gone after journalists who are critical of him. So I don’t place any credence upon his claim to be a “free speech absolutist”. He’s a businessman and I therefore see his acquisition of Twitter as being a means to an end either for him directly or his peer group. Twitter may or may not be the “town square” that he claims it to be but it certainly is an immense source of useful information, from a corporate perspective. It is also a tool that not only reflects opinion but can potentially be used to shape it. That makes it important.

View fullsize

So what happens next? Is Twitter going to become even more of a Wild West under Elon Musk’s watch? Maybe. Maybe not. He does claim to have other aspirations for the platform and not all of them appear bad. I certainly would favour a clampdown on “bot” accounts. However, if people leave preemptively, especially those from minority groups or with specific political leanings, then that decline that everyone fears will be accelerated. Sometimes, conceding ground is a sound strategy but I don’t believe that is the case in this instance. You don’t counter opposing ideologies by ignoring them or dismissing them. You meet them head on and your arguments stand or fall on their merits. Education is a slow process at times. Retreating won’t achieve any of that. “The line must be drawn here! This far, no further!” if you want a motivational Star Trek quote to validate the argument. 

View fullsize

I am fully aware that Twitter can be an utter cesspool at times. But broadly speaking that is not my own personal, daily experience. This is due to the fact that I control what does and doesn’t appear in my timeline. I often get the impression that a lot of people are using the default Twitter client and are not curating their timeline as well as they should. I expect Twitter to make some effort with regard to moderation and sanction when rules are broken but I also think it is incumbent on me to take an active role in managing what I am exposed to. Although I expect the local council to keep the streets clean, I still pay attention as to where I walk. If I step on a dog turd due to my own inattentiveness, that’s on me. Therefore, mute keywords and block users accordingly. It makes a surprising difference to your overall Twitter experience.

If you want a life that is totally devoid of risk, unpleasantness, upset and controversy then perhaps the best policy is to eschew all forms of social media. You may also wish to stay at home, avoid all family and personal relationships and any other form of direct human interaction. I’m not opposed to the concept of “safe spaces” but some mediums simply do not lend themselves to being one. Twitter is one example. Like a swimming pool, someone is always going to piss in it. Therefore, the most you can do is manage your own virtual borders and regularly curate your Twitter timeline. If done wisely your experience online can be very rewarding. Twitter will never be perfect, as it involves people who are by default “flawed”. As to how the platform performs under its new owner’s stewardship, perhaps a “wait and see approach” is appropriate. In the meantime, do what you can to protect yourself and focus on the positive aspects the platform provides.

Caring for the Elderly Part 16

View fullsize

Last December, my 91 year old Mother suffered a rapid mental decline and was hospitalised. We have subsequently learned that this is potentially due to another stroke. Whatever the exact medical reasons, my Mother has been left bed bound, unable to feed herself and in a state of mental confusion and distress. When she was discharged home in mid January it quickly became clear that the four care visits that were scheduled each day were not sufficient for her needs, despite the staff doing their best and my Sister and I providing additional support. Matters were further compounded by personal ill health and other external factors. My Sister has worked from home for the last two years but has now started a staged return to the office. As we felt would no longer be able to cope we turned to both Social Services and the local Mental health Team for any assistance that they could provide.

Both sent staff promptly to visit my Mother in February and assess her needs. The consensus was that a Nursing Home placement would be the best solution. This immediately raised the issue of funding. Fees in the London area are on average about £1000 per week, although they’re lower elsewhere in the UK. If you cannot afford these, you can seek financial assistance via the Local Authority/Borough Council but the criteria is very strict and there is a shortage of available places. Simply put, due to budgetary constraints the Local Authority prefers that people are cared for at home. However, my Mother’s Social Worker suggested applying for NHS Continuing Healthcare. If a patient has specific healthcare issues that require a high degree of support or that are rapidly changing, then NHS funding can be provided. It is in many ways one of the “best kept secrets” of the UK healthcare systems, as so few people seem to be aware of it.

View fullsize

To cut a very long and complex story short, I completed a substantial amount of paperwork and supplied a lot of medical evidence for my Mother’s claim. I attended a three hour meeting via Microsoft Teams in early March to be told at the end that the recommendation going forward was that she wasn’t eligible. As a result, I then focused on a back up plan of taking equity out of my Mother’s home to fund her care. I was therefore very surprised to be told two weeks later that the panel making the final decision had reversed the recommendation and had awarded my Mother full NHS Continuing Care funding. This included the care that was being provided at home as well as a future Nursing Home placement. By the end of March we were contacted by the local NHS CHC team regarding vacancies at suitable homes in the area. Three places were discussed and within a week a room became available in a home that specialises in dementia care.

I am fully aware that my family has been extremely fortunate in our dealings with Social Services, the NHS and in navigating the bureaucracy arising from Adult Social Care. In four months we have made a great deal of progress. I’ve read a lot of forums and subreddits where carers share their experiences in looking after family members and one of the most commonest themes is the slow speed at which the administrative wheels turn. At the beginning of April I met with the manager of the care home that was offering my Mother a place. My Sister and I were also given a comprehensive visit of the premises, which was not a stage managed tour but a very clear insight into the daily life there. We were even shown around the laundry and kitchens. Based upon what we had seen and discussed, as well as the online reports from the Care Quality Commission regarding the home, my Sister and I decided to accept the placement and my Mother moved in on April 7th.

View fullsize

My Mother is often at her most lucid after her midday meal. I took the opportunity to try and explain the situation to her a few days prior to her move. She does not have “capacity” to use medical terminology but I felt obliged to try and explain such a major change to her life. I think she broadly understood that care in her own home was no longer the best option. Her attention wandered after 5 minutes or so but I felt compelled to discuss the matter with her. Perhaps it had more to do with me and the need to come to terms with my actions. I know I’ve made the right choice with regard to my Mother’s care but placing a loved one in a home is a major decision. However, I now think I have reconciled myself to the fact that I am no longer directly responsible for my Mother’s daily wellbeing. The baton has been passed to others and I need to trust them and allow them to do their job.

Update: Life is filled with change and is seldom static. I wrote the bulk of this post the day after my Mother went into care. She spent two and a half days there before becoming ill. On Sunday 10th of April she was taken to hospital and admitted with pneumonia and sepsis. She was given 24 hours to live. The hospital Chaplain sat with her that evening. Amazingly she slowly recovered over the next 12 days and was discharged on April 21st. Due to strict COVID-19 regulations I was not able to visit her in hospital and so I was looking forward to seeing her when she returned to the care home. Fate has intervened once again, as I was informed on April 22nd that she has now tested positive for COVID. She’s not going back to hospital but remains in poor health and is currently having difficulty swallowing. I suspect that she may not bounce back a second time. However, she is being very well cared for.