Battlefield REDSEC
The Battlefield 6 Battle Royale game mode, known officially as Battlefield REDSEC, was released today at 15;00 on all platforms. REDSEC, which is short for “Redacted Sector,” offers an interesting take on the Battle Royale genre, blending familiar elements from games such as Fortnight and Warzone, while maintaining those unique aspects of Battlefield. Hence, you will find missions, loot crates and an ever decreasing environment, as well as the squad class dynamics and the destructible environment. The map offers both urban areas as well as open countryside thus supporting multiple play styles. Furthermore, REDSEC includes two additional modes. Gauntlet and Portal. Although it has launched alongside the first season of Battlefield 6 (which comes with an optional season pass), REDSEC is available to download as a standalone mode and is free-to-play.
The Battlefield 6 Battle Royale game mode, known officially as Battlefield REDSEC, was released today at 15;00 on all platforms. REDSEC, which is short for “Redacted Sector,” offers an interesting take on the Battle Royale genre, blending familiar elements from games such as Fortnight and Warzone, while maintaining those unique aspects of Battlefield. Hence, you will find missions, loot crates and an ever decreasing environment, as well as the squad class dynamics and the destructible environment. The map offers both urban areas as well as open countryside thus supporting multiple play styles. Furthermore, REDSEC includes two additional modes. Gauntlet and Portal. Although it has launched alongside the first season of Battlefield 6 (which comes with an optional season pass), REDSEC is available to download as a standalone mode and is free-to-play.
REDSEC Battle Royale FAQ:
REDSEC is set in Fort Lyndon, California.
The map includes beachside suburbia, a golf course and a military blacksite.
It’s the largest map in Battlefield history.
Instead of an enclosing circle of gas, there is a ring of fire which kills instantly.
The game mode supports 100 players, or 25 squads of 50 duos, battling it out.
Each class can unlock new gear through training paths. IE RPGs can be upgraded to guided missiles and drones can be upgraded to carry ordinance.
Armoured vehicles are present in the game. M1 Abrams tanks and M3 Bradley armoured personnel carriers are located in locked Vehicle Trailers.
There are Redeployment Stations around the map, although respawning is not as ubiquitous in this Battle Royale.
Players can favourite up to 8 weapons loadouts, which can be accessed in-game via Custom Weapon Drops.
There are crates offering random weapons and gear. There are also safes which the Engineer class can open with his tool.
Players can equip two personal armour plates.
There are multiple ziplines around the map.
Gauntlet Mode:
Gauntlet is a separate mode that is a relatively short, elimination-driven gameplay experience. 32 players (eight squads of four players) are dispersed across Fort Lyndon and must fight through various round-based missions. Players have five minutes to complete the objective for each round. The missions and locations change for each round. Gauntlet is focused upon teamwork and coordination.
Portal Mode:
Portal allows Battlefield 6 players to create their own game modes and bespoke maps. REDSEC Portal brings these tools to the Fort Lyndon map. Two official Portal maps are currently available with more set to follow in the weeks to come.
Battle Pass:
Coinciding with the launch of REDSEC, is Season 1 for Battlefield 6 and an accompanying battle pass system. This shares unlockable rewards and XP progress between both the base game and its Battle Royale REDSEC counterpart. EA have stated that they have no plans for there to be any exclusive REDSEC unlocks. However, not all skins from Battlefield 6 will be available. There is also an in-game store selling cosmetic items but so far, these remain within an military idiom.
Initial Thoughts:
I logged into REDSEC this afternoon and as I had bought the Phantom Edition of Battlefield 6, I had a free season pass with the first 25 levels unlocked. I then spent some time playing Battle Royale mode and then went online to watch some livestreams. At first glance, anyone coming from another major BR game will find a lot of familiar mechanics. You drop into the map with a squad and collect gear and perks from crates along the way. You can then pursue missions to gain XP and upgrades to your weapons and gear, while eliminating other players. You can access your own loadouts and use vehicles to traverse the map, although heavy armour is not so easily accessible. The main difference is to succeed you need to lean into the game’s squad dynamics and utilise their respective skills.
Healing your team is important, so Support classes are advantageous with their ability to revive players quickly. That being said, all players can drag a downed teammate to cover and heal them but it takes longer. Engineers improve vehicles by their presence and can repair on the fly. The tactical ladder that accompanies the Assault class is invaluable, affording access to vantage points that aren’t accessible from the ground. The Recon class has the advantage of drones and the ability to drop bombs on targets. However, the biggest game changer in this Battle Royale is the destructible environment. You can create your own access into a building with C4 or a sledgehammer. Similarly, if an enemy squad is entrenched in a fortified position, you can demolish it with sufficient fire power. Plus, there is no ultraquick omnimovement in this game. Speedy gunfights may work in some scenarios but not all.
So far, I think that Battlefield REDSEC is sufficiently different from its competitors. Due to the franchise’s game mechanics, there is greater appeal to casual and new players because they will be able to find a role if gunplay is not their forte. No doubt REDSEC will attract “sweaty tryhards” but they may not find things to their liking and their standard strategy will not work so well in this environment. There won’t be any gas play clutches, as in Warzone and last moment heroics driven by omnimovement and hipfire may be far less commonplace. It may even be the case that vehicles prove to be the key to winning. Also, Javelin, a custom kernel-level anti-cheat system, may also be a major factor in keeping REDSEC an equitable gaming experience because it appears to work. Time will tell. In the meantime I believe the correct assessment of today’s release is “so far, so good”.
Screenshots from Jackfrags livestream.
Social Gaming Alone
This post started out as something completely different. I was simply going to write about a popular new game, how it came to my attention and my impressions and thoughts once I had purchased it. But while reflecting on one aspect of the game; the social element that stems from playing with friends, I realised I had more to say about this rather than just writing a review. But such is the nature of writing. In my experience my train of thought is seldom linear. So this post has now morphed into some musings about social gaming and how it is an integral aspect of modern game design. Because playing games with friends is often regarded as a superior experience to playing alone. At least by game developers. I think that the reality is more nuanced and dependent on the game in question. However, I do think that some games are better played with people you know and that playing on your own or in a PUG is less fun. Because that has been my experience of late.
This post started out as something completely different. I was simply going to write about a popular new game, how it came to my attention and my impressions and thoughts once I had purchased it. But while reflecting on one aspect of the game; the social element that stems from playing with friends, I realised I had more to say about this rather than just writing a review. But such is the nature of writing. In my experience my train of thought is seldom linear. So this post has now morphed into some musings about social gaming and how it is an integral aspect of modern game design. Because playing games with friends is often regarded as a superior experience to playing alone. At least by game developers. I think that the reality is more nuanced and dependent on the game in question. However, I do think that some games are better played with people you know and that playing on your own or in a PUG is less fun. Because that has been my experience of late.
Now the “buzz” surrounding Fall Guys: Ultimate Knockout reached my social media timeline a few days after the games release on August 4th. As I already play a Battle Royale game (Call of Duty Warzone) I didn’t feel the need to investigate the new game any further. However, after several YouTube channels that I subscribe to reviewed the game positively, I decided to delve a little deeper. So I watched some live streamers play the game and quickly decided to give Fall Guys: Ultimate Knockout a go. Mainly because everyone I saw playing it was having fun. The game has a cartoon-like aesthetic and the collision physics are endlessly amusing. But what stands out the most from all the video footage of gameplay I’ve seen, is that it engenders a sense of communal fun. That kind of “in the moment”, organic enjoyment that stems from friends being together and sharing an experience.
And that is exactly the opposite experience to what I’ve had. Although Fall Guys: Ultimate Knockout is most definitely fun, playing like a cross between “Takeshi’s Castle” and “It’s a Knockout/Jeux sans frontières”, it does feel like something is missing when you play solo. There’s no one to share the moment with when you fail spectacularly, or run “interference” against other players if you’re having difficulty. Choosing an exotic costume becomes somewhat arbitrary as a single player, compared to the mirth it creates when riffing off friends. Outside of Fall Guys: Ultimate Knockout, there are benefits to be had from playing socially in other games. I enjoy Call of Duty Warzone but when I watch live streams and YouTube videos, you cannot deny that the game can be played far more effectively in co-ordinated groups. You just don’t get that with PUGS, which usually range from adequate to “herding cats” to mental torture.
The summit of my social interaction in video games is when I play MMORPGs. I’ve been in the same kinship in The Lord of the Rings Online since 2009 and still regularly enjoy organised gameplay via Discord. Although this is fun, it is limited to just one game and the nature of MMOs doesn’t really lend itself to a great deal of diverse experiences. I haven’t played any games from other genres with friends and people I know since 2016. The last time was when there was an organised game night via The Newbie Blogger Initiative and a few people got together and played Overwatch. Since then I’ve just used the auto grouping option in the games that I play. It’s not so much an issue of a lack of friends but the fact that no one seems to be playing the same games as me (and vice versa). The fact that not all games support crossplay is another factor.
I also suspect that age may well have a bearing on this. Younger people tend to have larger, active social circles. These decline over time, something I have written about in the past. Now naturally my online friends play and enjoy video games. It’s usually one of the reasons why I follow someone on Twitter. But many of the people I know locally, despite being of a comparable age to me, don’t play video games. They tend to be interested in more traditional leisure activities like football, reading tabloids and casual bigotry. So upon mature reflection, despite there being a focus on social gaming as a source of fun by the industry itself, my reality is not the same. Returning to Fall Guys: Ultimate Knockout for example, my experience is not like those who play in a group. It’s like being at a party where you drink and move around the periphery of events, laughing at jokes you overhear but not actively participating in any meaningful interaction. It’s an odd sort of fun by osmosis, just by dint of being present. Social gaming alone, as it were. And I’m beginning to tire of it.
Call of Duty Warzone Matchmaking
I’ve been playing Call of Duty Warzone for about a month now and have documented my progress through the game and my attempts to improve my performance. It would be generous to categorise me as a distinctly average player. But I don’t worry too much about this as I am not alone. Not everyone is a high end player, although one’s perspective on this can be skewed as it is the most competent players that tend to dominate games. However, through simply playing CoD WZ regularly, despite my low body count per game I have slowly progressed through the ranking system. I am currently ranked 103 (the cap is 155). CoD WZ is generous with XP and each game’s score is not just based upon your kills. Your final position out of 150 other players is also a factor. There are additional marks for damage and a lot of other superfluous factors that the devs had added to ensure that even the weakest players move forward through the rankings.
I’ve been playing Call of Duty Warzone for about a month now and have documented my progress through the game and my attempts to improve my performance. It would be generous to categorise me as a distinctly average player. But I don’t worry too much about this as I am not alone. Not everyone is a high end player, although one’s perspective on this can be skewed as it is the most competent players that tend to dominate games. However, through simply playing CoD WZ regularly, despite my low body count per game I have slowly progressed through the ranking system. I am currently ranked 103 (the cap is 155). CoD WZ is generous with XP and each game’s score is not just based upon your kills. Your final position out of 150 other players is also a factor. There are additional marks for damage and a lot of other superfluous factors that the devs had added to ensure that even the weakest players move forward through the rankings.
Now despite what Infinity Ward have said publicly, there is a matchmaking system in place and sadly it appears to be somewhat basic. Rank features in group placement plus some backend stats regarding kill ratio. To cut a long story short, a month on I now find myself placed in games with players of a comparable or higher rank than me. Many of whom have reached the maximum tier through ability and not attrition. The net result is that my enjoyment of Solo Battle Royale matches has somewhat diminished. As an average player I expect to die when going head to head with someone with superior skills. But when this happens two thirds of the time, it does sour one’s experience and pleasure. There are sufficient random factors that mean I can sometimes find myself in an optimal position or I quickly obtain good gear but these are becoming fewer and far between.
I played a Solo Battle Royale game yesterday in which I chose a relatively isolated part of the map to land (The building site in the Novi Grazna Hills). I looted several houses and got a half decent assault rifle and sufficient armour. I think I did this in under 5 minutes. In the same amount of time another player had landed nearby, collected sufficient money to call in a Loadout Drop, select their optimal weapons selection and then sniped me through a window at a considerable distance. I was quite impressed but it highlights the problem with the current matchmaking system perfectly. This other player knew the map inside out and had robusts skills. It raises the question, what are the benefits of us being placed in the same game? It’s not as if I offered any sort of significant challenge to them. And if this happens continuously to me, it doesn’t exactly motivate me to keep playing.
I am not a fan of “Git Gud” culture. As I’ve written already in previous posts, I’m happy to try and learn some general tips and tactics to try to play more efficiently. Becoming a better player does improve your overall enjoyment. But I’m not looking for a “job”. Let the high end players with their stats and gaming philosophy play with comparable players. I would prefer to tool around in the shallow end with those of a broadly comparable mindset and ability. Unfortunately, the current matchmaking system doesn’t seem to be able to accomodate this. Does this mean that I’ll end up abandoning Solo Battle Royale games? No. But I will be more cautious and adjust my expectations accordingly. In the meantime I have found a compromise. CoD WZ has 5 versus 5 Multiplayer games which use very compact maps. These are great levellers, due to the frenetic pace. A poor player armed with an RPG and a SMG that they fire from the hip can do just as well as a good player. This mode doesn’t crush my interest and keeps me engaged. Something the devs could learn from with their wider matchmaking.
Video Games: The Broadest of Churches
I started playing video games in the eighties, mainly coin-op arcade machines. By the time the nineties console boom began, I was out of school, working and therefore bought several generations of home entertainment systems. By the late nineties I moved over to the PC and subsequently got access to a wider variety of games. I came relatively late to the MMO boom, although I had played other types of multiplayer internet-based games. Thirty-five or so years later, I find myself a mature player of games (I do not identify as a gamer per se but that’s another blog post entirely) with a bunch of views, opinions and expectations shaped by the decades I’ve lived (and played) through. Simply put, my head is at a different place to those who are ten, twenty or thirty years my junior. Games have evolved, just like popular music, TV and movies. The associated culture around video games has also been subject to change. You may well think I’ve just stated the “bleedin’ obvious”, but in my experience it doesn’t hurt to re-iterate this point when addressing a new trend or craze that on first inspection seems somewhat abstract to us.
I started playing video games in the eighties, mainly coin-op arcade machines. By the time the nineties console boom began, I was out of school, working and therefore bought several generations of home entertainment systems. By the late nineties I moved over to the PC and subsequently got access to a wider variety of games. I came relatively late to the MMO boom, although I had played other types of multiplayer internet-based games. Thirty-five or so years later, I find myself a mature player of games (I do not identify as a gamer per se but that’s another blog post entirely) with a bunch of views, opinions and expectations shaped by the decades I’ve lived (and played) through. Simply put, my head is at a different place to those who are ten, twenty or thirty years my junior. Games have evolved, just like popular music, TV and movies. The associated culture around video games has also been subject to change. You may well think I’ve just stated the “bleedin’ obvious”, but in my experience it doesn’t hurt to re-iterate this point when addressing a new trend or craze that on first inspection seems somewhat abstract to us.
The cue for this post came from Wolfy over at Through Wolfy’s Eyes. He stumbled across a video from a young Fortnite player and then wrote about his general bemusement of the Battle Royale scene and its associated popularity with younger gamers. I broadly agree with his sentiments about this particular genre. Battle Royale games have become ubiquitous and are now the de facto style for most forms of multiplayer PVP. They are also frequently egregiously monetised. Because they are founded upon competitive play, bragging rights and bellicose self-pride are an integral part of the associated culture. Like many other game genres, this too has developed its own a lexicon of slang and associated tropes and memes. If you are not part of this “world”, it can look quite alien and bewildering. What is the appeal of Battle Royale? Why has Fortnite found such a fanbase among the under twenty-fives? Why are “kids” (like the one Wolfy references) writing songs and posting them on You Tube. However, if you take a step back and reflect less on the game and more on the culture, it does start to fall into place. Wolfy reached his own conclusion, and I would like to expand upon it further.
Fortnite Battle Royale was in the right place at the right time. PUBG initially whet competitive gamers appetite with a simple innovative new spin on PVP. Fortnite simply refined that formula further with a game that looks more appealing, colourful and dynamic. Hence it found its home with the youth audience and because of its chosen visual style, it doesn’t at first glance look problematic to the passing parental glance. The fact that the game is also accessible across multiple platform is another reason why it’s taken hold. It also has a degree of cross platform support. And let us not forget that it’s a free-to-play product, so the initial barriers to entry are low. All things considered it’s hardly a surprise that it found success with its current demographic. Developers Epic Games have subsequently ensured that the game has regular tie-ins with other franchises that match its customer base. Thus, the game has keeps growing and making money. Lots of money.
Humans are social creatures and our teenage years are a time where we seek to establish our own identities and affiliate with some social group to find a sense of belonging. Fortnite, although boasting players of all ages, has most certainly been claimed by the youth market. It is a fast and frenetic game that requires quick reflexes, both physically and mentally. Such gameplay favours the young. And like anything else that the youth market claims as it own, a bespoke culture has quickly grown around it. And that culture is by exclusionary by design. Teens want to have things that are their own. Unlike the adult world that they inhabit, here is something that they can control. They broadly remain gatekeepers to this sub-culture. Frankly they want adults to be bamboozled and sceptical of it because the last thing they want is to share it. Cast you mind back to when you were young. The quickest way to kill your interest in a band would be for one of your parents to claim to like them.
So it’s hardly surprising that videos such as the Fortnite Anthem Rap Song spring up on You Tube. Although it is obvious that the kid in the video has had a lot of assistance from others older than him, this is simply just a contemporary example of fan culture. It’s about bragging rights, cultural ownership and it’s also a clear snub to those who are not part of the “in crowd”. Far from being something alien it is in fact utterly and even re-assuredly normal. It wouldn’t be difficult to write 500 words as to why this phenomenon is just a question of “same meat, different gravy”. However, I could also write a comparable amount about why this sort of fandom can also segue way into less desirable territory. Fortnite can bring people together and offer them fun, as well as a sense of belonging. But this video reflects elements of the associated hubris that can come with competitive play. Ego, winning at all costs and smack talk are only a stone’s throw away from tribalism, bullying and prejudice. Some schools are at a loss as to how to deal with things like the “floss dancing” and insults couched in Fortnite terminology. Perhaps some are over reacting, but any popular craze can always be used as a means of exclusion and oppression. Children can also be notoriously cruel.
So, I broadly understand these new manifestations of gaming culture. Whether I like them or not is a separate issue and not really relevant. However, I don’t see them as unfathomable because they’ve happened before, and they’ll happen again. Battle Royale games are enjoying their moment in the sun, just as MMOs did and traditional FPS titles like Call of Duty. Gaming despite pushback from certain quarters, has grown from a niche market pastime to a mainstream leisure industry. It is now an extremely broad church which simply reflects the diversity of society. If I were 15 years old now, I no doubt would be playing Fortnite and being a little shit about it. But as I’m 35 years older than that, I am content to let this game pass me by, as I clearly see it’s not targeted at me. The games selling points are focused elsewhere. But paradoxically, if you analyse a fan’s rap song about Fortnite and then do the same with a two-hour documentary about the works of Ennio Morricone, that I’d really enjoy, you’ll find that they’re not that different. Although we wouldn’t want any reciprocal enjoyment of each other’s work.