Experimenting With AI
For the last few months I have being using Google Gemini. I subscribed so I could access a wider spectrum of services and evaluate it effectively. I also wanted to dispel some of the hysteria that accompanies any conversation about Large Language Models and Artificial Intelligence. The results were initially interesting and Google Gemini proved useful when researching material for blog posts. It is good at providing summaries about well documented subjects. I wrote a post about food banks recently and it distilled a lot of data into a manageable amount, which was ideal for my article. Google Gemini has also produced some visual basic scripting and simple batch files that have allowed me to automate processes on my PC. Such as changing the default monitor, or screen resolution at the click of an icon. However, I found this AI struggled with in-depth software troubleshooting and that its ability to create images varies greatly depending on the subject.
For the last few months I have being using Google Gemini. I subscribed so I could access a wider spectrum of services and evaluate it effectively. I also wanted to dispel some of the hysteria that accompanies any conversation about Large Language Models and Artificial Intelligence. The results were initially interesting and Google Gemini proved useful when researching material for blog posts. It is good at providing summaries about well documented subjects. I wrote a post about food banks recently and it distilled a lot of data into a manageable amount, which was ideal for my article. Google Gemini has also produced some visual basic scripting and simple batch files that have allowed me to automate processes on my PC. Such as changing the default monitor, or screen resolution at the click of an icon. However, I found this AI struggled with in-depth software troubleshooting and that its ability to create images varies greatly depending on the subject.
The first major adjustment I had to make while using Google Gemini is that I needed to be very specific in how I phrased my question. Google Gemini is not intuitive and doesn’t always proactively ask you for additional data. It will take the prompt provided and doggedly work within its confines. You then realise that it needs more information and thus end up micromanaging the process, as it attempts to solve your problem. It would get to the right solution eventually but the amount of time and effort I would have to make with my continuous interventions and data updates, some what took the shine off the end results. This became very apparent when I tried to finally solve a long term problem regarding intermittent connectivity issues between my PC and Fire HD10 tablet, when using a USB cable. Appraising me of the failings of Microsoft Media Transfer Protocol without giving any useful suggestions within the parameters I’ve asked isn’t helpful.
A rather generic fantasy image depicting Ecthelion Versus Gothog, created via Google Gemini
Another issue that quickly became noticeable was that of image generation and the disparity in quality between specific types. On one occasion I asked Google Gemini to create an image specifically for a blog post, because I couldn’t find a comparable one online. I wanted a picture of a group of demonstrators outside parliament talking to a news reporter and crew. I eventually gave a detailed prompt and found this replication of a common place event to be satisfactory. However, when I gave detailed instructions for a fantasy based image, I found the results to be somewhat formulaic and lacklustre. Google Gemini seems to work best when drawing from established data and images. When called upon to do something inherently creative it doesn’t fare so well. Furthermore, if you draw attention to any mistake or confusion arising from your interactions with Google Gemini, the AI becomes excessively apologetic to the point of obsequiousness.
It was ultimately this lack of intuition and proactivity that made me cancel my subscription to Google Gemini. Using it was too labour intensive and required me to constantly oversee the proceedings. For me that mitigated some of the benefits inherent in using such a tool. Hence I moved on to ChatGPT and decided to proactively determine if it had the same failings as it competitor. I asked it whether it felt it was intuitive and likely to seek clarification on its own accord rather than just colour “within the lines”. It confidently stated that it was a more intuitive by default and immediately proved so when I set it the same problem that Google Gemini had laboured over to no avail. ChatGPT not only solved the problem with my tablet but gave me multiple solutions. It also displays its thinking process as it works through a problem, which is both useful and intriguing. Its creative artwork is superior, or has at least proven so for the present.
A map of Númenor created via ChatGPT
AI in various shapes and forms is a reality that is no going to go away. That being said, I do not think it is the universal solution that many think that it is at present and I suspect that there will be several high profile failures in the months to come that will do much to reset both business and the public’s expectations. Sadly, I also think there will have to be an adjustment around the wider issue of those who directly affected by the use of AI. If I ever have to commission any further design work for my website or the branding associated with it, I will always hire a professional. However, for minor work, AI will suffice. For example I wanted a detailed, high resolution map of Númenor and gave the task to ChatGPT. The results were fine. However, this never was a paying job to begin with. A few years ago, before AI became commonly available, I would have just gone without or drawn it myself. The fact that a tool now exists to do it for me, means I will use it.
Thoughts on Blogging Part 25
On Friday 26th June, I had another random spike in internet traffic to Contains Moderate Peril. The statistical package that comes with my Squarespace account recorded over 13k visits in less than 24 hours, which is not typical (although I wish it was). However, all of these visits to my blog arrived via the default homepage and spent between 1 and 2 minutes there. Hence, it was obvious that this was not human traffic, as there was no evidence of any searches being made of content that is available on my site, nor of the “visitors” clicking on any of the links on the top menu and viewing other posts. This was undoubtedly AI traffic arriving at the designated homepage and simply parsing the site. I had a similar spate of this sort of web traffic last November. The only difference on that occasion is that the traffic all came from China. This time round it hailed from the US. I suspect that this is something that will happen more often as companies set their AI loose on the net for what is effectively training.
On Friday 26th June, I had another random spike in internet traffic to Contains Moderate Peril. The statistical package that comes with my Squarespace account recorded over 13k visits in less than 24 hours, which is not typical (although I wish it was). However, all of these visits to my blog arrived via the default homepage and spent between 1 and 2 minutes there. Hence, it was obvious that this was not human traffic, as there was no evidence of any searches being made of content that is available on my site, nor of the “visitors” clicking on any of the links on the top menu and viewing other posts. This was undoubtedly AI traffic arriving at the designated homepage and simply parsing the site. I had a similar spate of this sort of web traffic last November. The only difference on that occasion is that the traffic all came from China. This time round it hailed from the US. I suspect that this is something that will happen more often as companies set their AI loose on the net for what is effectively training.
Generative AI summaries became available via most major search engines in spring 2024, after a year or so of testing. They have been well received by the public and have now become a common place tool. You ask a question and instead of a list of links with posts featuring a possible answer, you instead get a summary of the relevant data from all those sites. It is a quick and convenient system where the AI does much of the heavy lifting. However such services have consequences. A study by Pew Research Center found that those using generative AI summaries are 50% less likely to click on any of the search results offered, preferring to end their enquiry once the summary has been provided. This has obviously had a significant impact on web traffic to the source websites that provide the data for the AI summary. For some it’s an inconvenience. For others it can ruin their business model, especially if they rely upon advertising.
There are further considerations beyond the financial. All too often, the AI in question scrape websites and blogs written and maintained by members of the public, rather than business entities. Fan created content produced by enthusiasts and non-professional writers such as myself. I have run Contains Moderate Peril since 2010 and fall squarely into this category. Although it has been satisfying to be part of a writing community and to interact with readers, my online writing has not brought any commercial success or benefits and over the previous 16 years has incurred an ever increasing operating cost. Until recently that has been an acceptable arrangement because I have grown an audience, which for me is one of the key reasons to write. However, AI summaries are eroding that audience and becoming a “middleman” that although beneficial for the end user, does me no favours at all. AI summaries have become information brokers and sadly, I am not the customer but a resource.
This situation was brought home to me last year when I was asking an AI a specific question about the MMORPG, Star Trek Online, that I couldn’t remember. Yes, I to use these services. The generative AI summary scraped an answer from one of my own blog posts, presented it to me with a link back to the original article I had written. Initially I thought this to be ironically funny but then it dawned upon me that from hence forward, my writing would no longer be primarily for a human audience. Instead my work would be parsed by AI to provide it with the answer they require for a third party enquiry. Yes, I may well be contributing to answering someone’s question, which in itself is a valuable thing to do but any tangible, positive benefits derived from this process would be directed at the AI service, rather than me. Essentially, my time, effort and money will be benefitting big business rather than me. To which my response is unequivocally “fuck that shit”.
Which leads me to a very important question from my perspective. Do I want to keep maintaining a blog under such circumstances? Generative AI summaries will become ubiquitous information brokers, separating writers from their audiences. Yes I’m sure established blogs with substantive, loyal audiences, will still attract direct traffic to their respective sites but Contains Moderate Peril doesn’t fall into that category. This websites halcyon days were between 2010 and 2014. 66% of my traffic nowadays comes from Google searches. Someone wants to find out about some niche market film, “Googles” it and then finds my review. Hence such posts have a good shelf life and can over time yield a constant feed of traffic. AI summaries effectively negate this process. Furthermore, simply becoming a regular Reddit contributor allows me to reach far more people than my blog ever does. There’s also far more interaction to be had between writer and reader.
The yearly Blaugust: Festival of Blogging is fast approaching. I usually undertake this event in a mentor role and try my best to write everyday for a calendar month. By doing so I showcase the merits and pleasures of writing online. If you are writing primarily for your own enjoyment, then that can certainly still be achieved. If you see writing as a means to build a community and reach an audience that you can interact with, then generative AI summaries are an impediment to that process. Because you are no longer the public face of the information being provided. The AI is now the assimilating that role. This issue is part of a wider sea change that is happening across the internet in the way we seek out and interact with content and those that create it. Am I happy with all the consequences of this change? Patently not, as this blog post indicates. Hence it is time for me to reflect and consider my options. I don’t enjoy spitting in the wind.
Learning via AI
In 1990 I was working at the DWP (Department for Work and Pensions). I had just taken the role of Computer Support Officer where I administered user access to the mainframe and provided first line support to staff using the terminals. That summer the office moved to a PC based network and the project was undertaken by the newly formed Siemens Nixdorf company. To cut a long story short I befriended one of the contract engineers and over the next 9 months he became an unofficial mentor to me. Technically he was only supposed to train me in the most basic of fashions but he liked the fact that I was always asking questions and effectively ended up schooling me in PC and server architecture, network administration and the associated protocols. For me this was the best way to learn. It was not a case of coming to grips with theory in a classroom environment. It was learning by doing and having direct and exclusive access to a source of knowledge and experience.
In 1990 I was working at the DWP (Department for Work and Pensions). I had just taken the role of Computer Support Officer where I administered user access to the mainframe and provided first line support to staff using the terminals. That summer the office moved to a PC based network and the project was undertaken by the newly formed Siemens Nixdorf company. To cut a long story short I befriended one of the contract engineers and over the next 9 months he became an unofficial mentor to me. Technically he was only supposed to train me in the most basic of fashions but he liked the fact that I was always asking questions and effectively ended up schooling me in PC and server architecture, network administration and the associated protocols. For me this was the best way to learn. It was not a case of coming to grips with theory in a classroom environment. It was learning by doing and having direct and exclusive access to a source of knowledge and experience.
Throughout my career in IT which ran until 2016, I always enjoyed the fact that there were always professional colleagues available who were happy to share knowledge. We would all call each other if something came up that required additional information. There would be a few engineers who were cagey but they were soon sidelined from our shared, informal ad hoc pooling of knowledge. One of the aspects that I liked so much about my career was the opportunity to continuously learn and challenge my assumptions. A lot of the time in IT, you would work alone so your successes were yours. However, having access to a network of like-minded friends and colleagues was an invaluable resource. One that I now miss. Not only because it was a great means to learn something new or solve a problem but because there was a social component to this network. We would often meet up for drinks after work and swap stories and news.
I have embarked on several technical projects recently and it’s extremely frustrating when I grind to a halt due to gaps in my knowledge. Having been out of my line of work for over a decade, I no longer have access to people “who know”. So I have started using AI as an alternative. As my questions have become increasingly complex, I’ve started subscribing to Google Gemini so that I don’t run into any kind of cap or restrictions. The results have proven broadly positive although there has been issues along the way. Overall, I haven’t changed my position on AI. It is a tool and like all tools can be used efficiently and effectively or it can be misused. I don’t use it for writing and only generate images for my own amusement. As far as providing technical support it is very useful, especially with simple coding issues or troubleshooting software. However, it does have its own foibles, or at least Google Gemini does, which have to be worked around.
Simply put Google Gemini is a pedant. If you ask a broad question you can and often will get a broad answer. Hence you have to be very specific and detailed in your questioning. It takes a while to find the right level of information you need to provide and the learning curve can be frustrating. I asked multiple questions about setting up the live streaming software OBS. I wanted the stream to be in 2K resolution and there were all sorts of configuration settings, many of which were linked to which make and model of graphics card you have. Google Gemini would often reference setting by names that were not present in the version I had installed, so all my subsequent questions had to reference the software version number to ensure relevance. As Google Gemini’s “knowledge” is drawn from the websites that it parses, there is often a bias towards whatever has been written about the most. Hence its answers although correct, may not be the most recent.
Hence AI’s need to be addressed in a very specific manner. Often you feel that your not only asking questions but you’re also like a sheep dog; trying to steer the entire undertaking in the right direction. Google Gemini now has the capacity to retain your previous questions to try and get a better overall understanding of what you’re working towards. Obviously this is a privacy issue and comes down to personal choice but I have allowed it for the present as none of my questions are about me personally. They are simply technical enquiries relating to minor tasks I’m undertaking. I do not use AI to do such things as write letters, compose emails as I am more than capable of doing such things for myself. Hence for the present, Google Gemini is not accessing vast swathes of personal information about me. Unless asking lots of questions about specific video games and their respective mechanics provides any insight.
The one thing that AI cannot provide is the social aspect that comes with shared problem solving with a network of professional colleagues. Often exchanging information with colleagues is done after work over drinks or a meal. The social component often leads to wider friendships. That aspect is not present when you’re learning via an AI. Mind you, the latter can be a lot cheaper, as you don’t have to buy it a pint either or make small talk with it. Joking aside, both methods of sharing knowledge and learning have their respective merits. My recent experience using Google Gemini has been a very interesting experience. The quality of answers the AI gives increase in the quality once you start subscribing and accessing a more advanced version. However, while writing this post and reflecting upon the network of colleagues that I use to have, has made me realise how much I miss both their expertise and company.
NVIDIA DLSS 5
Earlier this week, Nvidia posted a video featuring their latest iteration of DLSS technology (Deep learning super sampling). DLSS 5 is an AI-powered “real-time neural rendering” process and unlike previous versions that focused on improving frame rates through upscaling or frame generation, DLSS 5 uses generative AI to “infuse” frames with photorealistic lighting and material details that the game engine never actually calculated. Let us pause for a moment and consider these words. Material detail that the game engine never actually calculated. Therein lies the rub. If you watch the aforementioned video or peruse the images posted here, it is abundantly clear what the technology does.
Earlier this week, Nvidia posted a video featuring their latest iteration of DLSS technology (Deep learning super sampling). DLSS 5 is an AI-powered “real-time neural rendering” process and unlike previous versions that focused on improving frame rates through upscaling or frame generation, DLSS 5 uses generative AI to “infuse” frames with photorealistic lighting and material details that the game engine never actually calculated. Let us pause for a moment and consider these words. Material detail that the game engine never actually calculated. Therein lies the rub. If you watch the aforementioned video or peruse the images posted here, it is abundantly clear what the technology does.
The technology used in DLSS 5 is interesting. It uses a model trained to understand “scene semantics”. Assets such as human skin, hair, and fabric can be augmented to add realistic effects like subsurface scattering (how light glows through skin). It enhances surface textures in real time, making materials like weathered leather or brushed aluminium appear photorealistic. DLSS 5 come with a suite of developer for studios to flag specific areas and aspects of games for AI enhancement, while also protecting areas so they maintain their original art style. DLSS 5 is expected to launch in Autumn 2026 and will probably be linked to the upcoming release of the GeForce RTX 50 Series of graphics cards.
However, setting aside the technology used, it is hardly surprising that Nvidia’s promotional video has been poorly received (the reveal video receiving an 84% dislike ratio on YouTube). There are several major concerns that arise from this technology. Many gamers and developers worry that GPUs will essentially be adding details that don’t exist, rather than accurately representing the game and its art design. Some feel this shifts gaming away from a human-crafted experience toward an AI generated one. At present such technology requires a dual-RTX 5090 graphic card setup. No doubt the next generation of GPUs designed specifically to run DLSS 5 will be exceedingly expensive, driving up the cost of gaming. There are also concerns that Nvidia’s claims that artists will maintain “full control” will prove spurious.
However, perhaps the biggest point of contention stemming from the use of DLSS 5“ is the so-called Yassification” of games. “Yassification” is an internet slang term referring to the process of heavily editing an image, typically a face, using AI-powered beauty filters to make the subject look more glamorous, polished, or generically attractive. Critics argue the AI acts as an intrusive “beauty filter” that significantly alters character faces and designs. For example, in a DLSS 5 demo for Resident Evil Requiem, the character Grace Ashcroft appeared with botoxed lips and modified hair, leading to accusations of “AI slop” that bypasses the original artist's intent. Many gamers think that DLSS 5 technology is effectively a “yassification machine”. There are concerns that such technology could be used by some gamers to modify games in bespoke ways, such as changing race or gender to effectively “de-woke” them.
Although I do see the possibility for this technology to be used in the culture wars in a politicised manner, I think the most immediate problems will be those pertaining to copyright and the overall legality of augmenting games in this manner. There is a risk that AI tools of this nature could alter trademarked IP within a game such as a brand logo or copyrighted image without direct developer involvement. This could potentially invalidate the licensing agreement that the developer's may have with third party organisations. There have also been legal questions raised over the data scraping that Nvidia has used to train its AI for DLSS 5.
It is also worth noting the belligerent and tone deaf response by Nvidia's CEO Jensen Huang to gamer pushback, which he called “completely wrong”. His semantically driven argument was essentially focused on the tools that come with DLSS 5 being the means to ensure against any malfeasance. Clearly he is unaware of public opinion regarding the reliability and moral rectitude of corporate promises. I suspect that the arguments will continue from both sides over the months ahead. The real test will be whether the new generation of Nvidia GPUs that support DLSS 5 sell well. Many gamers are notorious hypocrites. However, with RAM and other hardware prices increasing at present, it may be a case that the cost will be the main problem that slows the uptake of DLSS 5.
A Year in Technology
Looking back at my various posts regarding “technology” this year, a recurring theme has been my ongoing attempts to replace certain mainstream products with alternatives that do the job in-hand better, don’t require constant updates, aren’t bloated by superfluous functionality and are more cost effective or even ethical. Needless to say, this has proven quite hard. Hence I was unable to find a suitable replacement email client for Microsoft Outlook and end my subscription to Microsoft 365 Personal. The main problem is that most alternative software won’t support my email archive due to differences in the mailbox format. One possible work around is to install an older and therefore, non-subscription version of Outlook but this raises support and compatibility issues. It would be a lot easier to divest myself of a lot of mainstream software if I was starting from scratch.
Looking back at my various posts regarding “technology” this year, a recurring theme has been my ongoing attempts to replace certain mainstream products with alternatives that do the job in-hand better, don’t require constant updates, aren’t bloated by superfluous functionality and are more cost effective or even ethical. Needless to say, this has proven quite hard. Hence I was unable to find a suitable replacement email client for Microsoft Outlook and end my subscription to Microsoft 365 Personal. The main problem is that most alternative software won’t support my email archive due to differences in the mailbox format. One possible work around is to install an older and therefore, non-subscription version of Outlook but this raises support and compatibility issues. It would be a lot easier to divest myself of a lot of mainstream software if I was starting from scratch.
AI is currently everywhere and seems to be the biggest talking point of the year. I have mixed feelings on the subject as I feel that it can be a useful tool in some specific circumstances. I like AI tools that can be used to fix photos, as I am currently cataloguing my parents’ prodigious collection. Some of the pictures are from the start of the last century and have a lot of damage. I occasionally use AI for collating basic data. The sort of information that is not disputed or subject to political misrepresentation. However, I don’t agree with AI being used to bypass paid creativity and sadly that appears to be at the vanguard of its use. I’m sure Disney’s $1 Billion investment in OpenAI will end with negative consequences for the existing animators, voice artists and other creative employees. I look forward to an EU law that mandates that the use of AI has to be declared when buying a product or service.
Another notable aspect of 2025 has been the ongoing war between ad blockers and their respective corporate opponents. YouTube has pushed back hard against such apps and browser extensions. Although advertisements can still be blocked, there are notable delays, sometimes commensurate with the blocked adverts running time, before the desired video will actually play. Advertising has become more pervasive and invasive, even finding a foothold on my Windows 11 lockscreen and desktop. Fortunately such features can be removed. Advertising on social media also became problematic and is harder to remove or bypass. All of which indicates an advertising market that is declining, or at least fragmented, hence corporations are pursuing “their piece of the cake” more aggressively. Again, shareware, freeware and companies offering a one time payment, rather than a subscription become more appealing.
A short break at the end of October served as a timely reminder of the ubiquitous nature of the internet in our life and our reliance upon it for both work and leisure alike. I found myself in an environment (a static caravan) that did not have internet access by default and I briefly lost connectivity. It certainly gave me pause for thought about how I live my life. In the meantime while grappling with this philosophical crisis, I resolved the immediate problem by internet tethering to my phone. Another recent change is how I fill “dead time”. Over this year I have pivoted from reading while waiting for a bus, train or travelling, to relying on my phone to entertain me. This is mainly via the internet, with games such as Roblox. It’s not something I’m particularly proud of and I shall try and address this in the New Year. Using the internet for leisure is fun but everything in moderation.
I bought a little new technology this year, mainly out of necessity. My phone needed replacing due to battery bulge and my ageing monitors were becoming difficult for me to see clearly. So I bought a new handset and a pair of 2K monitors. I hope that I can future proof my current desktop PC for another 24 months. Looking forward to 2026, my next technology based endeavour is to see if I can ditch Windows as an operating system for everyday use. Perhaps set up a dual boot PC with a bare bones install of Windows for running games and some variation of Linux, such as Zorin OS, for everything else. I also need to continue with locking down my phone and making web browsing via that device as good an experience as using my PC. Overall technology is losing its appeal. Too often causes just as many problems as it solves. It also tends to serve the manufacturers needs more than the customers.
Thinking Out Loud
Simply put, I got fed up with my ongoing diet last week, so I came off the wagon. There were a few glasses of wine too many and a couple of meals that were larger than the new prescribed portion size. As a result, my weight has remained the same as last week’s. On mature reflection, I am glad it didn’t gain weight as that would be very counterproductive. Weight loss and trying to change your diet are difficult tasks and somewhat joyless. Mainly because you are denying yourself pleasure. However, I don’t like what I see when I look in the mirror, so if I wish to regain my former status as a minor deity and sexual Tyrannosaurus (in my mind), then I need to get back on track.
This is yet another post where I write a series of random thoughts, gathered under the title “Thinking Out Loud”. The fourth, if we’re counting, which we’re not. I tend to do this on Mondays but that’s not legally binding.
The Diet (Again)
Simply put, I got fed up with my ongoing diet last week, so I came off the wagon. There were a few glasses of wine too many and a couple of meals that were larger than the new prescribed portion size. As a result, my weight has remained the same as last week’s. On mature reflection, I am glad it didn’t gain weight as that would be very counterproductive. Weight loss and trying to change your diet are difficult tasks and somewhat joyless. Mainly because you are denying yourself pleasure. However, I don’t like what I see when I look in the mirror, so if I wish to regain my former status as a minor deity and sexual Tyrannosaurus (in my mind), then I need to get back on track.
Digital Terrestrial Television
I seldom watch live television these days, although it is something I did all the time as a child. However, there was no other option at the time until the advent of the VCR. Nowadays I use on demand, streaming services most of the time. Especially those paid services without any advertising and on screen graphics. However, because I am a “belt and braces” sort of person, I recently bought a USB digital terrestrial TV tuner for my PC, in case the internet ever goes down. We still have a roof antenna (although it is in the loft) and there’s an outlet in the spare room that I use as an office. Hence, it was no effort to run a cable from the socket, to the USB device and then to my PC.
I don’t know how bad digital terrestrial TV is in your country but it is pretty poor here in the UK. I’m not talking about the prestige channels such as BBC or Channel 4. I mean the cheap, filler stations that fill the extremities of the TV guide. Most of these channels are in standard definition, with poor digital compression and colour grading. There are far too many adverts, so you sometimes only get 9 minutes of actual content before the next commercial break. As for the actual programs, they tend to be low grade reality shows such as “cooking with ghosts”, or cheap cosy crime dramas about a barista who solves murders by night. If these channels broadcast old classic shows, they’re often edited for content so they can be shown at any time of day. Such is the reality of so-called “free” content. If you’re not paying, this is what you get.
Cleaning the Wheelie Bins
Upon adulthood, regardless of whether you cohabitate or live alone, you quickly discover that there are chores that need to be done. Clothes don’t miraculously wash themselves. You have to go grocery shopping to some degree. If you don’t clean your home, it will become verminous. Hence, we usually get into a routine of dealing with these tasks. How effective this is comes down to you as a person. However, not all chores are immediately apparent or even expected. We have 4 wheelie bins provided by the local council, to handle our rubbish and recycling requirements. Due to the hot weather we’ve had of late, these have all needed cleaning because they contained more maggots than a Lucio Fulci movie. Needless to say this chore fell to me.
Armed with a garden hose, an old mop and a couple litres of disinfectant, I set about keeping this sinister plague at bay. It certainly wasn’t a glamorous job. Nor was it something I ever envisaged doing when younger. Along with unblocking toilets, cleaning up fox shit, removing all spiders from the house, clearing leaves from the guttering and expressing the cat’s anal glands when they’re blocked. No wonder kids don’t want to grow up these days. Due to the internet, they know that adulthood isn’t half as good as it’s cracked up to be.
The Ubiquity of AI
I built a new PC in January which meant a fresh install of Windows 10. My policy regarding this operating system is comparable to one I have regarding my own body. Namely, I don’t install anything that isn’t necessary (I’m not sure if that analogy quite works). Hence I tend to check the various updates that Microsoft regularly shunts out, to ensure that I’m only installing essential patches, rather than superfluous new features. Sadly, this is not a process you can 100% control. Which explains how I found Microsoft Copilot installed on my PC, after an alleged minor update,
Now I am not at present pathologically against AI. Artificial intelligence is a tool and like any tool, it is the manner in which it is used which foremost dictates how it is perceived. Currently, AI seems to be running rampant like a schoolyard craze among kids. The world and his wife is trying to crowbar such services into their business model. All too often the results are not good and are subsequently withdrawn. Take courier company DPD for example and its customer service chatbot. AI is also saturating other markets. Take the freelance marketplace Fiverr. A lot of the design work on offer is now AI generated and frankly shit. YouTube is awash with AI generated content which is generic, simplistic and utterly bland. As for AI voiceovers, they are excruciatingly stilted.
I make it my business now to opt out of any potential AI scraping of material that I produce. Today, I went into my Twitter/X settings to ensure that the Grok AI couldn’t parse my tweets for training purposes. I have done the same with my Squarespace website. Again, I want to keep a level head about AI but suspect that senior management in a lot of major businesses see it as a means of bypassing services that previously they’d have to pay for. It’s not so much AI per se that’s the problem but AI in the hands of unreconstructed capitalism.
The Importance of Bots
The inclusion of AI bots in any multiplayer game is always an added bonus. Playing against bots is a great way of learning the basics of a game and practising your strategy. It also provides a welcome break from the human element of any game, which can become wearisome at times. It’s also a good insurance policy for the future, when a games popularity may have waned and finding an online game may prove difficult. Therefore, I am pleased to see this facility present in titles such as Call of Duty: Black Ops franchise, Overwatch, For Honor, and Friday the 13th: The Game. Bots are also present within the MMO genre. For example, these include your skirmish soldier in LOTRO or your away team in STO. When I played SWTOR I found that some companions were invaluable due to their role as a healer. And let us not forget combat pets. They may well be fluffy and cute or have large pointy teeth, but they’re bots no less.
The inclusion of AI bots in any multiplayer game is always an added bonus. Playing against bots is a great way of learning the basics of a game and practising your strategy. It also provides a welcome break from the human element of any game, which can become wearisome at times. It’s also a good insurance policy for the future, when a games popularity may have waned and finding an online game may prove difficult. Therefore, I am pleased to see this facility present in titles such as Call of Duty: Black Ops franchise, Overwatch, For Honor, and Friday the 13th: The Game. Bots are also present within the MMO genre. For example, these include your skirmish soldier in LOTRO or your away team in STO. When I played SWTOR I found that some companions were invaluable due to their role as a healer. And let us not forget combat pets. They may well be fluffy and cute or have large pointy teeth, but they’re bots no less.
As an advocate of bots, I would like to see them present in a lot more games. One of the main reasons for this, is that I see them as a solution to player toxicity. At least half of all the games I experience in Friday the 13th: The Game are unsatisfactory due to my fellow players fooling around, trolling or simply trying to pursue their own agenda. I stopped playing Overwatch because too many players have become self-appointed arbiters of how to do things “correctly”. And I ceased playing For Honor online due to the proliferation of “lag switch” cheating. Bots resolve all these issues and conspicuously lack a propensity for continuous garrulous inanities. Obviously, if you are a top tier player you may find bots an unsatisfactory opponent. Plus, there’s little fun to be had crowing or taunting a defeated AI opponent. But for the average player, bots can offer an entertaining and enjoyable experience free from stupidity and annoyance.
I would also like to see a greater presence of bots in the MMO genre. Often due to the culture of racing to level cap, if you’re absent from a game for a while, you’ll find yourself in a level appropriate region devoid of other players. If you’re part of a big enough and helpful guild, you’ll may find others to help you through instances and dungeons. But that isn’t always the case and personally, I don’t want to have to be dependent on the good will of other players. I would like to have access to multiple AI companions from different classes that would allow me to tackle what is usually group content. Now some players would consider this an anathema, stating that it mitigates the point of an MMO. However, the Achilles Heel of the genre is the very inter-dependency upon other players. Irrespective of ideological arguments, from a business perspective it is not wise to inconvenience your player base. If I cannot progress, then I will go find something else to do.
I believe that bots may well become more common place in gaming because they ultimately fit into the “live services” mindset that is currently on the rise within the industry. Bots offer convenience and convenience is a marketable commodity. Unlocking a bot healer, DPS class or tank that would allow me to clear content in MMOs that I currently cannot currently do or more to the point, clear more quickly, is something I would pay for. AI technology is also something that is constantly improving, so may be existing prejudice against it will diminish over time. Certainly, the inclusion of AI bots in a game increases its longevity and that therefore impacts positively upon its financial lifecycle. And if we’ve learned anything from the games industry in recent years is that fiscal imperatives drive the market. So, don’t be surprised if the next big thing is the proliferation of bots. I for one will welcome it.