Nintendo Switch: The Best Console I Haven’t Bought
I recently wrote about the allure of console gaming and how exclusive titles can often be a big incentive to buy one. However, I’ve been a PC gamer for 25 years now and find that the biggest stumbling block regarding consoles is using the dual thumbsticks on the controller. I can cope with one but having to use two simultaneously is just not something I can do in a coordinated fashion. Hence I won’t be buying a Xbox of Playstation anytime soon. The Nintendo Switch is another matter altogether. This platform is unique in several ways. I like the immediacy of a handheld gaming option and of course Nintendo has the benefit of the Mario franchise. Many of the games for the Switch are more “benign”, lacking the inherent violence and destruction of other platforms' flagship titles. Like Nintendo itself, the Switch exists in its own specific niche.
I recently wrote about the allure of console gaming and how exclusive titles can often be a big incentive to buy one. However, I’ve been a PC gamer for 25 years now and find that the biggest stumbling block regarding consoles is using the dual thumbsticks on the controller. I can cope with one but having to use two simultaneously is just not something I can do in a coordinated fashion. Hence I won’t be buying a Xbox of Playstation anytime soon. The Nintendo Switch is another matter altogether. This platform is unique in several ways. I like the immediacy of a handheld gaming option and of course Nintendo has the benefit of the Mario franchise. Many of the games for the Switch are more “benign”, lacking the inherent violence and destruction of other platforms' flagship titles. Like Nintendo itself, the Switch exists in its own specific niche.
Since writing that post earlier on in the week I have given serious consideration to buying this unique console. I spent some time looking at the various bundles that are on sale and trying to ascertain which retailers were offering the best deal. It would seem that the standard price for the Switch in the UK is £279, which is a reasonable price from my perspective. The latest games on physical media seem to maintain a fixed price but I found plenty of online key sellers that were offering digital download codes at discounted prices. The other major advantage that the Switch offers is that I can play in the lounge if I choose to connect to the TV. This offers a better environment for social gaming, which is again another good selling point for this console. My Granddaughters are at an age where the colourful and friendly games that Nintendo offer are becoming appealing to them.
Sadly, during the course of my research I hit a problem. One that put my plan to purchase a Nintendo Switch on hold, indefinitely. I just can’t find any games that I especially want. That’s not to say that the platform doesn’t have any. Quite the opposite. It has a lot of quirky and interesting games to offer. However, none of them especially appeal to me. I wanted a RPG but the most popular titles appear to be JRPGs and that is a genre I struggle with. I don’t like the aesthetic or propensity for hyperbolic voice acting. I’m also not sure if my love for Mario Kart alone can justify the purchase of a new console. I did toy with the idea of buying Skyrim and Witcher III but as I have those titles on the PC already, it seemed redundant to pay for them a second time. So I decided to postpone this acquisition for the immediate future until a game comes out that grabs my attention. It’s a shame really because the Switch seems to have so many positive things going for it. I guess for the present, it’s the best console I haven’t bought.
LOTRO: Bullroarer Update 28 Preview #1
I spent several hours last night exploring the preview of Update 28: War of the Three Peaks on the Bullroarer test server. I usually take a look at all new content for The Lord of the Rings Online in advance, as it always makes for an interesting blog post. However, this preview has proven a little more controversial than usual, as Update 28 is not going to be free (as all prior updates have been). Standing Stone Games announced recently that it is to be sold as a “mini expansion”, which caused a stir among the LOTRO community. Hence my excursion on the public test server was not just to ascertain the scope of the new zone but to ascertain whether there was sufficient content and value to justify being sold as a “mini expansion”. Sadly, from what I have seen, I do not believe that to be the case.
I spent several hours last night exploring the preview of Update 28: War of the Three Peaks on the Bullroarer test server. I usually take a look at all new content for The Lord of the Rings Online in advance, as it always makes for an interesting blog post. However, this preview has proven a little more controversial than usual, as Update 28 is not going to be free (as all prior updates have been). Standing Stone Games announced recently that it is to be sold as a “mini expansion”, which caused a stir among the LOTRO community. Hence my excursion on the public test server was not just to ascertain the scope of the new zone but to ascertain whether there was sufficient content and value to justify being sold as a “mini expansion”. Sadly, from what I have seen, I do not believe that to be the case.
The new region, Elderslade, is North of Misthallow in the Wells of Langflood. As the road winds further into the hills the trees give way to rocks, grass and shrubs. The flora changes from shades of green to yellow hues. The first main Dwarf encampment is Annak-Khurfu in the South of the zone. It delves into the hillside and is in the same aesthetic idiom as Skarháld. You’ll find Durin and Gloin inside and a wealth of PVE content including the new “Missions”. These are instanced solo or duo, narrative driven quests. Outside of Annak-Khurfu, the stable-master provides access to all the other regional Dwarf camps as well as the War of the Three Peaks zone. This is a separate phase of the entire Elderslade region. Wyrmgraf is a ravine to the East of the zone, filled with worms and drakes. This leads to an instanced network of caves. To the extreme North, at the end of the road lies Car Bronach. Its iron gate blocks further passage. And to the West of the region you find the Gates of Gundabad. Ancient Dwarf ruins infested with Orcs, Goblins and Trolls. There is also an Iron Crown settlement in the centre of the map called Zudramdan. The overall design of the zone is suitably dour and bleak, due to its altitude.
Gates of Gundabad and Zudramdan
Overall, Update 28: War of the Three Peaks seems to be just a standard LOTRO update. It offers a single new map, PVE content and “Missions”, which seem to be a variation of skirmishes. Then there is this separate phase of Elderslade, which may be for PVP. I’ve not found a clear explanation yet but that’s hardly surprising as SSG are poor at communicating and collating information in a single accessible place. As an Update, the forthcoming Elderslade region offers “more of the same” in game terms but I don’t think that this content merits the label “mini expansion”. Apart from creating a new environment, the zone just recycles existing Dawrven, Orcish and Angmarim assets. The fact that the Collectors and Ultimate Fan Editions are to be bolstered by such cosmetic items as the Wild Boar mount indicates that maybe SSG thinks so too. And in the space of just 24 hours, players have already taken umbrage at both the proposed changes to the Guardian and a reduction in disenchanting embers from some existing instances.
I suspect that the recent downtime and the ongoing performance issues that are still blighting the game have hit SSG hard financially. They are probably obliged to hit specific financial targets set by Daybreak Game Company and have failed to do so in recent months. If that is the case then they’ve probably been “instructed” to raise revenue via alternative means and this hasty repackaging of an update into a “mini expansion” is their “get out of jail” card. Or at least on paper. Because I’m not sure if this is going to work. I have not yet renewed my subscription due to the games performance. Why should anyone pay for a game that is plagued by lag and random server disconnects. Bearing this in mind, why would I buy a “mini expansion” that is light on content and potentially just as unplayable as other areas in the game? Although I enjoy LOTRO and still have a soft spot for this MMO, I think this business decision smacks as too much of a “fire sale”. Will core fans yet again indulge SSG or are we reaching a tipping point? Only time will tell.
Star Trek Online: Buying Reputation
It would appear that Standing Stone Games isn’t the only MMORPG developer making controversial business decisions at present. Cryptic announced yesterday that they were introducing a means to purchase reputation tiers in Star Trek Online. A move that was met with much virtual eye rolling over on the games unofficial subreddit and more angry comments on the Massively Overpowered website about “pay to win”. The main issue isn’t the adding of this particular mechanic to the game. STO is no stranger to adding services that allow you to bypass “the grind” by spending money. Monetisation has been built into the game since it went F2P in spring 2012. The primary objection to this rep buyout system is the price which is about £20. Furthermore this only buys reputation up to Tier 5. Tier 6 still has to be earned and it’s a particularly arduous chore. There are also 13 reputation factions to complete.
It would appear that Standing Stone Games isn’t the only MMORPG developer making controversial business decisions at present. Cryptic announced yesterday that they were introducing a means to purchase reputation tiers in Star Trek Online. A move that was met with much virtual eye rolling over on the games unofficial subreddit and more angry comments on the Massively Overpowered website about “pay to win”. The main issue isn’t the adding of this particular mechanic to the game. STO is no stranger to adding services that allow you to bypass “the grind” by spending money. Monetisation has been built into the game since it went F2P in spring 2012. The primary objection to this rep buyout system is the price which is about £20. Furthermore this only buys reputation up to Tier 5. Tier 6 still has to be earned and it’s a particularly arduous chore. There are also 13 reputation factions to complete.
The reputation system in STO becomes available at level 50 (there are currently a level cap of 65 in the game). Players can undertake various repeatable PVE group content and earn reputation marks. These are then used on reputation projects which unlock the various tiers. As each tier is completed the player can then access specific reputation based traits, armour weapons and ship consoles. These sets offer significant statistical improvements over standard gear and some have become part of the current game build meta. Hence unlocking all 13 factional reputations is desirable. If you log into the game daily and earn marks for all factions, it will take about two month or so to complete all. However, such an undertaking requires a lot of dedication and would monopolise a players activity in-game significantly. So it is hardly surprising that Cryptic have decided to “ease” this process for players.
The problem lies in the cost and the fact that STO is becoming more focused upon catering to “whales”. I am a member of the Reddit Alert fleet and it has a large amount of players that invest heavily in the game. The net result is a very clear financial divide in the games community. There are still plenty of free options available to players as long as they’re prepared to grind for them. But all too often you’ll find players from opposite ends of the spectrum when playing PVE group Task Force Operations. Those who have a standard ship with gear dropped from missions or bought from the Exchange. And those with lock box vessels and maxed out gear from the reputation system and colony suppliers. Naturally this causes a disparity in combat performance, which then leads to players not wanting to auto group. And if you can’t group then you can’t easily earn the rep tokens. And so the divide in the community increases further.
The Allure of Console Gaming
The last console that I got genuinely excited about and subsequently purchased was the Sega Dreamcast. That was back in 1999 when it became available for European customers. Prior to this I had owned the NES, SNES and Sega Mega Drive (as the Genesis was known outside of the NA). I upgraded the latter with the SEGA CD and 32X addons. But I never got round to buying a Sony Playstation. However, a good friend of mine had one, so between us we had access to all the latest games across multiple systems. Therefore I can say wholeheartedly that console gaming was my platform of choice throughout the mid eighties up to the late nineties. Furthermore, due to my age (I was born in 1967), I wasn’t a child during my 15 year period of console gaming. I was employed and had an income, so could keep up with the latest releases and indulge in “novelty” peripherals such as the light gun for the SNES or the “maracas” for the Dreamcast.
The last console that I got genuinely excited about and subsequently purchased was the Sega Dreamcast. That was back in 1999 when it became available for European customers. Prior to this I had owned the NES, SNES and Sega Mega Drive (as the Genesis was known outside of the NA). I upgraded the latter with the SEGA CD and 32X addons. But I never got round to buying a Sony Playstation. However, a good friend of mine had one, so between us we had access to all the latest games across multiple systems. Therefore I can say wholeheartedly that console gaming was my platform of choice throughout the mid eighties up to the late nineties. Furthermore, due to my age (I was born in 1967), I wasn’t a child during my 15 year period of console gaming. I was employed and had an income, so could keep up with the latest releases and indulge in “novelty” peripherals such as the light gun for the SNES or the “maracas” for the Dreamcast.
However, in 1994 I got my first PC. A Compaq ProLinea 4/33. The processor was an Intel 486DX running at 33mhz. It was primarily used for producing a fanzine and similar DTP work but it could run Doom after adding a sound card and a CD-ROM drive. A year later, after increasing the memory to 16MB RAM, the PC was running Windows 95 and Quake. By the time 1999 rolled around, I was on my third PC and beginning to move away from console gaming. The two major games that shifted my focus to the PC were Star Trek Academy and the original Unreal Tournament. Although I loved the Dreamcast, especially games such as Sonic Adventure, Crazy Taxi and Virtua Fighter 3tb, there was a decline in available content. Also the internet was now a major factor and had an impact upon my gaming choices. Unreal Tournament could be played online against multiple players. Quake III on the Dreamcast could be played via the integral modem with only 4 other players.
Hence by the start of the new millennium, I moved exclusively to PC gaming. As a result I’ve never owned any iteration of either the Xbox or Playstation. Yet since 2000 there have been several occasions where I have seriously considered buying one of these. Often that decision has been driven by an exclusive title that wasn’t available for the PC. Later the idea of being able to play games and DVDs on one device based in the lounge, rather than on a PC in another room was enticing. However, the later change in media formats, IE HD-DVD and Blu-ray, curtailed such ideas. But the biggest hurdle to returning to console gaming has always been having to use a game controller. It’s an odd situation because in the past I’ve always successfully managed to use gamepads. I think the introduction of thumbsticks has been the main obstacle. When playing a game, I can move in one direction while aiming in another perfectly well when using a keyboard and mouse. However, I find doing the same with two thumbsticks counterintuitive.
As the launch of the next generations of consoles comes ever closer, once again I have perused the press releases, watched the various promotional videos and tried to read between the lines of the various reports from the gaming press. As ever, some of the exclusive game titles are intriguing and have piqued my interest. But my enthusiasm is immediately tempered when I reflect upon the versatility of my current PC along with it’s upgradability, compared to a console. A Playstation or Xbox, however well specified, is still a platform dedicated to one task. Therefore, I cannot really justify purchasing either next generation devices. There may be some “wiggle room” regarding the Nintendo Switch though. It’s portable and offers a somewhat different catalogue of games. Plus I have fond memories of playing Super Mario Kart on the SNES back in the nineties. So I guess I’m in the same boat as fellow blogger Syp over at Bio Break. I have “no dogs in this console contest” as well. For the present, I’ll stick with PC gaming while regarding the latest next generation consoles with a degree of envy, regardless of whether it’s misplaced.
Quickscoping
Developers do like to gate access to the best gear and equipment in video games. Often there will be an achievement or deed required to unlock the object that you desire. Now I have no objection to this concept in principle. It’s just that every now and then, the criteria required to access an item is beyond my abilities. Take Call of Duty Modern Warfare/Warzone. Infinity Ward recently added the Rytec AMR to the game. It is a semi-automatic sniper rifle that can use thermite and explosive rounds. It has a significantly higher rate-of-fire than the HDR and AX-5, and performs better at range than the Dragunov. I’ve been itching to get my hands on this weapon for a while. However, to unlock it, you have to complete the following achievement. "Get 2 quickscope kills using sniper or marksman rifles in 15 different matches". For me this is effectively one of the labours of Hercules.
Developers do like to gate access to the best gear and equipment in video games. Often there will be an achievement or deed required to unlock the object that you desire. Now I have no objection to this concept in principle. It’s just that every now and then, the criteria required to access an item is beyond my abilities. Take Call of Duty Modern Warfare/Warzone. Infinity Ward recently added the Rytec AMR to the game. It is a semi-automatic sniper rifle that can use thermite and explosive rounds. It has a significantly higher rate-of-fire than the HDR and AX-5, and performs better at range than the Dragunov. I’ve been itching to get my hands on this weapon for a while. However, to unlock it, you have to complete the following achievement. "Get 2 quickscope kills using sniper or marksman rifles in 15 different matches". For me this is effectively one of the labours of Hercules.
Quickscoping is a technique used by a player to promptly eliminate an enemy. When confronted with an opponent, you must quickly aim down the sight of your weapon (by pressing the right hand mouse button), instantly fires a shot (by pressing the left mouse button) and then returns to the default view (by releasing the right mouse button). To have a kill counted as a quickscope kill, you'll need to “one-shot” a target within 1- 2 seconds of aiming down sights. You'll require a weapon with a “one shot” capability that can also aim down sight (ADS) as quickly as possible. It also helps to be proficient with sniper and marksman rifles and to have fast reactions. Let it suffice to say, I am not fast enough to easily undertake this task. I played seven matches last night and only managed to achieve 2 quickscope kills in one game. I have to do this another 14 times to unlock the Rytec AMR.
Like many other video games, Call of Duty Modern Warfare/Warzone has an ingame store. One of the things it sells are weapon blueprints. These are plans of bespoke builds, that if purchased instantly provide you with a reciprocal weapon, irrespective of whether you have the base version of the same weapon unlocked. However, this system comes with a minor but significant caveat. I bought the blueprints for a particular version of the Rytec AMR. If I equip this version and use it while playing, I will level the weapon and unlock all the various barrels, sights and other customisations. However, I will not be able to equip any of these items until I unlock the gun itself, which inevitably brings me back to that achievement that I’m currently struggling with. I still have to “get 2 quickscope kills using sniper or marksman rifles in 15 different matches".
I guess if I play enough, I can unlock this achievement by pure attrition. However, it does take the pleasure out of playing to a degree. I am currently using the Kar98k marksman rifle to try and improve my proficiency at quickscoping but it’s a slow process. In the meantime my kill to death ratio has taken a turn for the worse while I use this weapon. I don’t mind a challenge but there’s a fine line between an engaging learning curve and a tedious grind. It would be preferable if developer’s Infinity Ward offered a choice of achievements to unlock weapons, so the player could at least find one that they enjoyed as well as met their skills set. If my attempts to unlock the Rytec AMR fail, I shall have to wait and see if a better set of blueprints for the weapon go on sale, as I would like to experience firsthand the benefits of explosive ammunition.
Is There a Gaming Hierarchy?
Syp wrote a post recently on his blog Bio Break, about the air of disdain with which some video games journalists report on the MMO genre. He cited a post over on VG247 in which the author was surprised that he was currently enjoying SWTOR, despite the fact it was an MMO. It was very much a case of “wow, this game is quite good considering most in this genre are rubbish”. As Syp pointed out, this is often the way the MMORPG is labelled and pigeonholed. However, I think there is more to this than just a dislike of a particular type of game by some writers and gaming commentators. I believe that many of those who have been playing video games since their youth and who are now aged 40 to 50, have very entrenched views and are weighed down by a lot of cultural baggage. I think that some believe that there is a sort of unofficial but very real gaming hierarchy and it is their sacred duty to act as self appointed arbiters and gatekeepers.
Syp wrote a post recently on his blog Bio Break, about the air of disdain with which some video games journalists report on the MMO genre. He cited a post over on VG247 in which the author was surprised that he was currently enjoying SWTOR, despite the fact it was an MMO. It was very much a case of “wow, this game is quite good considering most in this genre are rubbish”. As Syp pointed out, this is often the way the MMORPG is labelled and pigeonholed. However, I think there is more to this than just a dislike of a particular type of game by some writers and gaming commentators. I believe that many of those who have been playing video games since their youth and who are now aged 40 to 50, have very entrenched views and are weighed down by a lot of cultural baggage. I think that some believe that there is a sort of unofficial but very real gaming hierarchy and it is their sacred duty to act as self appointed arbiters and gatekeepers.
We all have our own personal likes and dislikes when it comes to video games. I certainly do. Occasionally I have stepped outside of my comfort zone and tried something new and it has proven a pleasant surprise. Other times my experiments have not gone so well. There are some titles and genres that will never appeal to me and I am content to leave them be permanently. However, I see no reason to hold those games that I do not like in contempt, nor do I deem it necessary to publicly disparage them along with those that do enjoy them. I haven’t the time to waste on such posturing and I’d much rather be playing those titles I do like. Sadly, video games just like music and film fandom, has a strong streak of snobbery running through its associated culture. Furthermore personal taste is often confused with artistic merit and one’s own preferences are erroneously perceived to be an endorsement of quality.
So what is the spurious gaming hierarchy that some cleave to? I suspect that competitive games are at the top, along with all the elitist “git gud” culture. Then there are the single player games with their litany of achievements and unlocks. MMOs are then the poor relation of the single player RPG. Walking simulators, fun games and clickers are deemed as a waste of time or not even being games. And the final circle of gamer hell are mobile games which are viewed with utter contempt. Which is odd when you think about it as this genre of games make the most money out of the entire video games industry. When you consider why such hierarchical notions exist, they appear to be an extension of the pecking order that some gamers apply to themselves. If there is a hierarchy of games, then it logically follows that there must be a similar ranking among gamers themselves.
Humans love an opportunity to segregate themselves. We categorise people according to wealth, class, education, gender and race. Sometimes such labelling and subdividing is benign but in other instances it is divisive and a tool of oppression. Yet it seems to happen regardless of its rectitude. You put a group of people in a room who are broadly similar and they’ll eventually divide themselves between who are left or right handed. So it is sad but inevitable that different types of games will be treated in a similar fashion. However, being aware of this societal trait then allows us to challenge it when encountered. So next time you read a post by a professional game critic that pooh-poohs a specific genre without a valid reason, call them out. Just as you would if they’d made a similar comment that metal is better than country music or that the MCU is superior to the works of Kurosawa.
Gaming News Roundup
I like to keep abreast of what’s happening in the video game industry, along with new releases and community news. So I subscribe to websites like Kotaku, GameIndustry and Massively Overpowered via Feedly. I also watch YouTube channels such as Gameranx and shows such as the Jimquisition. Often these platforms will highlight stories and issues that pique my interest. Sometimes I will feel the need to express an opinion or write a rebuttal but these talking points do not always warrant or require an entire blog article. So once again, I’ve decided to start another recurring blog post where I can highlight several of these news items and then briefly explore them. The Video Games Roundup is not meant to be a comprehensive summary of all current news. Merely items that I’ve found interesting, unusual or controversial. Sadly the latter is all too common these days.
I like to keep abreast of what’s happening in the video game industry, along with new releases and community news. So I subscribe to websites like Kotaku, GameIndustry and Massively Overpowered via Feedly. I also watch YouTube channels such as Gameranx and shows such as the Jimquisition. Often these platforms will highlight stories and issues that pique my interest. Sometimes I will feel the need to express an opinion or write a rebuttal but these talking points do not always warrant or require an entire blog article. So once again, I’ve decided to start another recurring blog post where I can highlight several of these news items and then briefly explore them. The Video Games Roundup is not meant to be a comprehensive summary of all current news. Merely items that I’ve found interesting, unusual or controversial. Sadly the latter is all too common these days.
The Lord of the Rings: Gollum.
This game first appeared on my radar in March 2019 when a press release caused quite a stir among Tolkien fans. Until recently not much has been known about the gameplay apart from the fact that this is an action-adventure game, with a stealth element. Last week developers, Daedalic Entertainment, released a trailer showcasing their visualisation of the iconic character, along with a press release providing further details of the mechanics featured in The Lord of the Rings: Gollum. It would appear there is a focus on a branching narrative and major story choices, The player chooses whether Sméagol or as Gollum is the dominant persona. With regard to gameplay, lead game designer Martin Wilkes stated there are similarities with Prince of Persia. All of which is very intriguing. I’m certainly curious to learn more prior to the 2021 release.
Fall Guy “Grabbers”.
Although you may think that Fall Guys: Ultimate Knockout is just a fun diversion in these dark days, I regret to inform you that it is the centre of a major moral, social and game development controversy. During gameplay, you can run, jump, dive and grab. The grab is designed to allow players to pull themselves up to ledges and over obstacles. It is also used in specific team games, such as the one where you have to grab a foxes tail from other players. However, humans being what they are, the grab function is also used in other more nefarious ways. Some players actively attempt to grab other players as means to prevent them from making progress and qualifying in a game. You’ll often find such players hanging around at the finishing line or loitering around obstacles in courses that are known to be difficult. Now grabbing in this fashion is part of the game and so is officially sanctioned. But it bitterly divides the playerbase. If you require further evidence of this, read the comments on this article about grabbing on Kotaku.
Text to speech “adverts” in live streams.
Many live streamers use text-to speech services to allow viewers to send them a message. Usually the message system is dependent on a donation. I’ve used such facilities before to send a humorous quip to a friend who is streaming. However, recently an advertising agency started using this text-to speech service to spam offers currently available at Burger King. As you can imagine this hasn’t gone down especially well with some streamers who do not like the idea of this messaging system being usurped for corporate advertising. From my own perspective, I don’t care for advertising per se nor the culture associated with it. I find adverts invasive and often intellectually insulting to begin with. The prospect of there being more in live streaming, which is a medium I’m already struggling to come to grips with, is essentially just another reason for me to give up and go elsewhere.
Register “for an opportunity to be one of the first to pre-order your PS5”.
There’s a lot to unpack in this statement. Essentially, Sony is anticipating a great deal of interest in their forthcoming new console but may not be able to satisfy the demand. Questions have been raised as to whether the global pandemic will impact upon manufacture and delivery of the PS5. However, a potential shortage can also provide a cunning marketing ploy if handled correctly. Which has led to Sony inviting US customers to register for the chance to pre-order. Just to clarify, that’s the “chance” to pre-order and not a guarantee of doing so. Yes, this is a campaign couched in hype, elitism and FOMO. All things that bring out the best in a gaming community, courtesy of a big, multimillion dollar corporation. The dynamic that exists between the vendor and the customer is a curious symbiotic relationship. Despite the customer having the upper hand, the opposite is often portrayed. Companies have things that you need, that they sell to you out of the goodness of their heart. Only now you have to apply to buy them. It is truly risible. What makes it sadder is that Sony will probably get away with it.
A Month in Gaming
I’m still somewhat shocked that August has been and gone. Even by 2020 standards it’s been an odd month. Due to illness in the family, my schedule has been turned on its head and subsequently there has not been as much time for gaming as I’ve previously enjoyed. However, I tried to put what time I had to good use. I attempted to return to the MMORPG The Lord of the Rings Online once again, to see if I could continue through the epic story. Sadly, the game has run into further server related issues, just as it did last month. Standing Stone Games community manager Jerry Snook was a little “snippy” in responding to players' concerns and at present there are no details regarding what the problem is and when it will be resolved. If this issue persists I suspect that it is going to do some genuine harm to both the player base and community relations. I hope matters improve for SSG and LOTRO over September.
I’m still somewhat shocked that August has been and gone. Even by 2020 standards it’s been an odd month. Due to illness in the family, my schedule has been turned on its head and subsequently there has not been as much time for gaming as I’ve previously enjoyed. However, I tried to put what time I had to good use. I attempted to return to the MMORPG The Lord of the Rings Online once again, to see if I could continue through the epic story. Sadly, the game has run into further server related issues, just as it did last month. Standing Stone Games community manager Jerry Snook was a little “snippy” in responding to players' concerns and at present there are no details regarding what the problem is and when it will be resolved. If this issue persists I suspect that it is going to do some genuine harm to both the player base and community relations. I hope matters improve for SSG and LOTRO over September.
However, it hasn’t been all doom and gloom. I decided to buy Fall Guys: Ultimate Knockout, partially due to the wealth of positive reviews and feedback surrounding the game. It is great fun and often very amusing but I do seem to have developed a love hate relationship with the gameplay. I’ve failed to qualify for more than four games in a row and hence have not experienced much variety in races and challenges so far. I’m also not a fan of the team games, as I hate losing due to others, rather than my own actions. Hence progressing through the season pass is a grind. However, I occasionally have some good fortune and no matter how poorly you play, there’s always someone worse than yourself. The large number of “Tryhards” in the game are also a drag at times, as are players using the “grab” function in a negative fashion. But then it’s hard to stay pissed off with a game that lets you dress as a Triceratops.
I have made good progress through the Season Five Battle Pass in Call of Duty Modern Warfare/Warzone. As I suspected, players were initially quite happy to swamp the train that’s been added to the game. But a month on, no one seems interested anymore and it is substantially less dangerous to investigate now. The new FiNN Light Machine Gun has proven useful to players like me. I use the XRK LongShot Adverse barrel which provides not only an increase in range but an insane rate of fire. If you’re not especially accurate with your aiming, then these factors are a real boon. There is a degree of recoil to deal with but this can be compensated by firing in rapid bursts, rather than just holding down the trigger and hosing the gun around. Plunder continues to provide the best of both worlds with regard to play styles, so once again CoDMW/WZ has managed to hold my interest for yet another calendar month.
Over the next month, I shall be making a concerted effort to complete The Sinking City. I find that if I get sidetracked with too many other games, it is always the RPG that I’m playing that suffers. This is probably due to the fact that they need a more substantial time investment, so you can absorb the narrative. I have enjoyed this Lovecraft inspired game, despite its foibles and flaws. It certainly nailed the main themes of the Cthulhu Mythos. I think that I shall replace it with yet another RPG, as I like games with open worlds and dense lore that I can lose myself in. So I may purchase GreedFall next. It bears quite a few similarities to Amazon Game Studios forthcoming MMORPG, New World. However, after several beta tests, I have decided that the latter is not to my liking and think that the former will be a more suitable alternative. I hope that September doesn’t prove to be as tumultuous as August and that I can find the time to accommodate a new game.
Can Behavioural Science Create a Better Gaming Experience?
“Nudge theory” has received a lot of attention in recent months due to the global pandemic. The Behavioural Insights Team has played a key part in shaping the UK Government's policy to deal with COVID-19, although its overall success is questionable. Now I’m not going to debate in this post the ethical merits of “nudge theory” as a tool, especially within a political context. Let it suffice to say that such science can be used for both good or ill. However, due to some negative experiences I’ve had recently while gaming, I have been considering whether it is something that should be used more in video games. It’s obviously there already as I often see small, minor examples. In Star Trek Online, if you join a random Task Force Operation you receive greater rewards because you are helping players who under normal circumstances, cannot form a group. So the question is, should there be more “nudging” in video games?
“Nudge theory” has received a lot of attention in recent months due to the global pandemic. The Behavioural Insights Team has played a key part in shaping the UK Government's policy to deal with COVID-19, although its overall success is questionable. Now I’m not going to debate in this post the ethical merits of “nudge theory” as a tool, especially within a political context. Let it suffice to say that such science can be used for both good or ill. However, due to some negative experiences I’ve had recently while gaming, I have been considering whether it is something that should be used more in video games. It’s obviously there already as I often see small, minor examples. In Star Trek Online, if you join a random Task Force Operation you receive greater rewards because you are helping players who under normal circumstances, cannot form a group. So the question is, should there be more “nudging” in video games?
The most obvious and easiest means of “nudging” that can be implemented in video games is to incentivise an activity or process. If for example, you wish to encourage grouping in an MMO, then offer rewards that are superior to that which you would earn if you did the same content solo. Another option is to penalise players who leave a group before the activity is complete or those who go AFK and do not participate in the collective undertaking. Incentives could also be used to encourage top tier players at level cap to revisit lower level content and assist others. Why not offer rewards or accolades to those who “mentor” new players. If there are shortages of low level crafted items in a game, why not offer some sort of subsidy or bonus to encourage players to make more? Canny developers could use the power of nudge to foster a more communal attitude among players. As long as it is always just used to encourage and not coerce, then it should yield results.
Looking to other genres, nudge theory could be beneficial in turning the survival genre into more than just a race to the bottom. At present I find that such games often lapse into being murders simulators and it’s impossible to progress beyond a certain point. Collaboration is the key, as it is in real life. However, there are rules to prevent aberrant behaviour in society but video games seldom have any tangible consequences. In a survival, PVP or roleplay game, if a player becomes increasingly rogue there needs to be mechanics that reflect and offset that. Someone who murders and loots everyone they encounter should be free to do so but face such retribution as having a bounty being placed on them. Or if they need to trade for crafting materials, then the prices need to go up as the vendor becomes more fearful or distrustful of them. Red Dead Redemption 2 has elements of this in its gameplay. It would be interesting to see the benefits of rewarding those who work collaboratively to build a community in-game rather than just adopt the role of predatory lone wolf.
However, behavioural science may not always be applicable to a game. For example, “nudging” in the FPS and competitive genres is more difficult because it may impede valid ways of playing. Some folk don’t care for “camping” and it is still a hotly debated subject. But unless it specifically breaks a games TOS, then it’s a valid play style. Trying to move people away from such an approach is questionable. It comes down to arguments couched in subjective notions of sportsmanship, which are different to clearly more destructive behaviour such as “ganking” that we seem in unbalanced PVP. Another consideration is whether the presence of “nudging” in a game is seen as a coercive or a political tool? Will players balk at what some may describe as “social engineering”. The player base may not want to see policies of this nature implemented and this could potentially have an adverse effect on revenue.
Behavioural science is a means to an end and is in itself neither benign or malevolent. However, it has an “image” problem. People tend to not like “being tricked” or feel they’re being manipulated despite the fact it happens in advertising and marketing continuously (as well as politics). Nudge theory may not necessarily do these things but that’s how some perceive it. Especially once people know that it has been used on them in some way. But I think if we wish to arrest the process of gamer behaviour being driven by the lowest common denominator, then we may well have to make more use of behavioural science. For example, if the grab functionality in Fall Guys: Ultimate Knockout could also be used to offer other players a helping hand, this would offer an alternative mode of behaviour. One that is less predatory and more socially positive and inclusive. It would be interesting to see what player conduct prevailed.
Thoughts on the New World Preview
I, like many of my fellow bloggers, have been afforded an opportunity to try Amazon Game Studios forthcoming MMO New World, three times over the last 18 months. I did so twice, playing the two previous private tests. As a result of these experiences I have opted not to explore the latest public preview. I haven’t said anything prior to today regarding the game due to the NDA but as that has now been lifted I can express my opinions. Simply put, New World is not for me. It is certainly not a bad MMO and the developers have made some radical changes in the game’s design as they’ve responded to player feedback. The initial alpha test showcased an open world PVPcentric game. The second release tempered that with more PVE content. However for me, New World just doesn’t offer the things that I specifically enjoy about the MMORPG genre. I think with continued polish and fine tuning, it will be a solid game upon release and I’m sure it will find its particular niche.
I, like many of my fellow bloggers, have been afforded an opportunity to try Amazon Game Studios forthcoming MMO New World, three times over the last 18 months. I did so twice, playing the two previous private tests. As a result of these experiences I have opted not to explore the latest public preview. I haven’t said anything prior to today regarding the game due to the NDA but as that has now been lifted I can express my opinions. Simply put, New World is not for me. It is certainly not a bad MMO and the developers have made some radical changes in the game’s design as they’ve responded to player feedback. The initial alpha test showcased an open world PVPcentric game. The second release tempered that with more PVE content. However for me, New World just doesn’t offer the things that I specifically enjoy about the MMORPG genre. I think with continued polish and fine tuning, it will be a solid game upon release and I’m sure it will find its particular niche.
As I mentioned in a somewhat cryptic fashion in a prior post, New World sets out its stall quite clearly in the initial cutscenes, offering a standard story about the colonisation of a new island called Aternum. Set in the mid 17th century, the aesthetic of the game is of British America from that era, with a heavy dose of the supernatural and arcane thrown into the mix. During the test that I participated in my character woke up on the shore after a shipwreck; a very traditional MMO trope. The initial levels as I battled across the beach were designed to introduce the new player to the combat system, inventory and skills trees. All of which are very standard and intuitive. The action combat felt very fluid and it was not difficult to understand and implement blocking with a shield, flanking an enemy and then striking with a sword with light or strong attacks. There are then special skills with substantial cooldowns that can then be used tactically. I felt that this was one of the best aspects of the game and is one of the better implementations of action combat that I’ve experienced.
Sadly, I was less enamoured with the meat and potatoes of the rest of the game. The game engine, character realisations and environments are well designed. But there are no classes or specific roles as such. You choose armour and weapons types to suit your own preferences. This flexibility plays into the game’s original sandbox remit, which has now been augmented. The quests are somewhat arbitrary and clearly show how that they’ve been added at a later date to facilitate a change in the game’s direction. These mainly act as a means to send you to different parts of the island and gather resources. There is no complex, overarching narrative that I am aware of. The player gleans information about the island’s lore through exploration and what they find. The NPCs offer only text interactions and there is no voice acting. The game’s economy is driven by players via Trading Posts so you won’t be getting rich by selling trash loot to NPCs. You can salvage loot and repurpose the resources they yield for crafting.
Eventually after earning new gear and familiarising yourself with the games systems, a new player will eventually progress on to one of the major settlements in a region. These are held by varying factions and at this point you get to choose who you wish to ally with. Naturally it is here that the games PVP systems come into play. And it was at this point that I decided that I didn’t wish to play any further as the game had nothing further to offer me. I like complex narratives and storylines that twist and turn. I like voice acting and NPC with personalities, especially when they become recurring characters. I also enjoy the communities that spring up around MMOs. I suspect because New World still heavily leans towards PVP, rather than roleplay and story telling, its community will again not be for me. Beyond this, I can’t really say much more about this MMO. I haven’t played it to any great degree. Just enough to know that it’s not too my liking. But that does not make it a bad game and I look forward to observing how the game progresses and is received at launch.
LOTRO: More Community Management Problems
Not so long ago, MMORPG The Lord of the Rings Online was plagued by server instability and chronic lag. Many of the game worlds had to be closed and there was over a week of downtime. As ever, communication from developer’s Standing Stone Games regarding the nature of the problem and an ETA on a fix were minimal. The issue(s) were eventually mollified but not completely eradicated. However, a recent patch this week led to extended downtime, beyond that which was initially scheduled. Since then the servers have been “unstable”. So it would appear that “the problem” is back. The only difference this time round is that SSG have made a statement sooner, rather than later. Community Manager Cordovan (AKA Jerry Snook) posted the following on the game’s official forums. “The game worlds are experiencing periods of server instability due to external issues outside of our control. We are taking steps to mitigate these environmental and infrastructure challenges, and apologize for any issues you encounter”.
Not so long ago, MMORPG The Lord of the Rings Online was plagued by server instability and chronic lag. Many of the game worlds had to be closed and there was over a week of downtime. As ever, communication from developer’s Standing Stone Games regarding the nature of the problem and an ETA on a fix were minimal. The issue(s) were eventually mollified but not completely eradicated. However, a recent patch this week led to extended downtime, beyond that which was initially scheduled. Since then the servers have been “unstable”. So it would appear that “the problem” is back. The only difference this time round is that SSG have made a statement sooner, rather than later. Community Manager Cordovan (AKA Jerry Snook) posted the following on the game’s official forums. “The game worlds are experiencing periods of server instability due to external issues outside of our control. We are taking steps to mitigate these environmental and infrastructure challenges, and apologize for any issues you encounter”.
The vagueness inherent in this statement is stark and obviously very deliberate. When pressed for further details by LOTRO players on the forum, Cordovan’s reply was less vague and actually quite specific. It’s a clear example of corporate “wagon circling”. “I'm sorry, but even if it were theoretically possible to make that kind of statement, I would advise against it. If that gets me some heat here, so be it; you know where I stand. Besides opening yourself up to all sorts of issues as a business entity, you are then committing to that level of detail every time you have an extended outage. Let's say a technical answer along those lines would throw an employee specifically under the bus, or a valued contractor you intend to do business with long-term. Even if technically accurate, it would be bad precedent to set. Not to mention how it'd be picked apart over the long term. It would not work for us. When I begin to think about what the above would have meant for almost ten years of messaging with this company, my head explodes”.
This is a visual metaphor
I fully appreciate this stance. Naturally it’s not what I and other players want to hear. We’d much prefer something along the lines of “we’re going to recalibrate the flux capacitor and the game will be as good as new. Here’s some free shit”. But SSG is a business and one that is not totally independent. The nature of their relationship with Daybreak Game Company is still shrouded in mystery but most suspect they’re more than just “the publisher”. SSG relies on third party suppliers for many other services. Simply put they are not in a position to reveal anything, even if they wished to. But simply saying “we can’t talk about this for legal reasons, so you’ll have to suck it up and wait things out” doesn’t magically draw a line under the problem. Paying customers at the very least expect someone to do some “ass kissing” in these situations, regardless of whether it’s sincere or not. It’s in the unofficial but very real social contract that exists between the vendor and customer.
And it is in this area that SSG are sadly lacking. Their community relations skills are not exactly nuanced and their tone is seldom conciliatory. Many years ago, when I was running a small IT department, I learned quite quickly that bellowing at staff during a crisis, doesn’t help matters. So instead of me shouting “I can fix this problem a lot quicker if you assholes shut the fuck up”, I hired a member staff who had “good communication skills” and was adept at exuding confidence, placating stakeholders and making them feel that their concerns were important and being addressed. It would greatly improve matters if SSG took a similar approach and those currently involved in community relations were more soothing and understanding in their tone. I’d suggest the following. Make regular statements, even if they have little or no technical substance. Answer a few tweets or comments personally. Praise players patience. Do something like a giveaway or a trivia contest so that people are engaged but in a positive way.
Another visual metaphor
The upside of difficult situations, such as the one which SSG currently faces, is that they present an opportunity to learn. Sadly, SSG and Turbine before them seem to have a blindspot when it comes to reflecting upon their prior community relations disasters and adjusting their corporate behaviour accordingly. And then there’s Jerry Snook’s somewhat defensive statement. “This is not my first rodeo. If people don’t like me, fine”. That is a tacit admission of failure. Yes Jerry, we understand that you will always be damned regardless of what you do, by a percentage of the playerbase. Community relations can at times be like an endless Kobayashi Maru test. But PR is a war and not a battle. You keep trying until you change the needle on the dial. If one approach doesn’t work, you try another. And once again I have to reference the immense goodwill that LOTRO players harbour towards the game. They want a reason to be on SSG’s side. So why not give them one? You lose nothing by trying. But the consequences of not doing so are far more serious.
"Tryhards"
I discovered the term “tryhard” recently after reading a game related blog post. Like many contemporary terms the definition seems somewhat fluid. So the one that I think fits best is “a person who is perceived as putting too much effort into something recreational, such as a game”. Although I think this succinctly distils the essence of the phrase, I do feel a little further qualification and contextualisation is required. I don’t think this term is applicable to legitimate competitive gaming, so it’s not a label I’d apply to someone playing any sort of esport. Nor do I think it is meant for those players that just seek to become well versed in an MMO or similar genre of game. I feel this epithet is the province of those who seek to excel in games where the focus is having fun and not just winning. The post in which I read this term was discussing Fall Guys: Ultimate Knockout and I think that is a perfect example. I have encountered other players that fit this category while playing this game and you’ll find plenty more on twitch.
I discovered the term “tryhard” recently after reading a game related blog post. Like many contemporary terms the definition seems somewhat fluid. So the one that I think fits best is “a person who is perceived as putting too much effort into something recreational, such as a game”. Although I think this succinctly distils the essence of the phrase, I do feel a little further qualification and contextualisation is required. I don’t think this term is applicable to legitimate competitive gaming, so it’s not a label I’d apply to someone playing any sort of esport. Nor do I think it is meant for those players that just seek to become well versed in an MMO or similar genre of game. I feel this epithet is the province of those who seek to excel in games where the focus is having fun and not just winning. The post in which I read this term was discussing Fall Guys: Ultimate Knockout and I think that is a perfect example. I have encountered other players that fit this category while playing this game and you’ll find plenty more on twitch.
So I guess the first question that arises from the label “tryhard”, is what is so bad in trying to be good at something? To which I’d answer, nothing in principle. The point I think people are trying to make when they label someone in such a fashion, is that these players whose sole focus is the pursuit of excellence end up leaching all the pleasure out of the game for others. Furthermore, if a significant percentage of the playerbase falls into the “tryhard” category, it creates a sort of philosophical fun divide and an environment where new and casual players are either squeezed out or at the very least deprived of the fun that the game is predicated upon. If you want an analogy, I’d say it’s like the over competitive parent who has been in training all year long for the Mum or Dad’s race at their child’s school sports day. Something that is supposed to be lighthearted and about the spirit of participation, is usurped by those who are determined to win and make some kind of statement.
However, I’m a contrary bastard at times. Although I’m not especially enamoured with the “tryhard” mindset and will loudly refute the bogus argument that “it’s never just a game”, I don’t like the idea of a self appointed “fun police”. This is why I think it’s important for game developers who make competitive titles, to ensure they have some viable matchmaking system in place, so that players are grouped according to their skill. Surely implementing such mechanics would please all parties? Unless being a “tryhard” isn’t just about the gratification of excelling but just another way of trolling others. The idea being that it’s another facet of the self aggrandising, braggart culture that pervades gaming. An excuse to sneer at those who don’t succeed and a means of controlling a game at the expense of others enjoyment. I wouldn’t say that all “tryhards” are elitists pricks but I’d certainly put money on elitist pricks being “tryhards”.
It seems that a week cannot go by without the video games industry or gaming culture highlighting or manifesting some unpleasant facet of human nature. Friends and colleagues assure me that there isn’t any major cultural shift occurring and that gaming (and life) has always had a degree of “douchebaggery” associated with it. But I’m not so sure. Anecdotally speaking, I’ve consistently found myself coming last in Fall Guys: Ultimate Knockout, while other players leave me in their wake. It does surprise me that some people have become quite so adept, so quickly. I’ve also seen a lot of players loitering at key locations in the game and deliberately impeding and hampering other players. Again, if it doesn’t breach the games TOS, then technically it’s okay to do so but isn’t this supposed to be lighthearted fun? There’s an ongoing debate at present as to whether games are becoming less fun, I’m not so sure. It’s difficult to tell. But we as a community don’t seem to be doing ourselves any favours.
Social Gaming Alone
This post started out as something completely different. I was simply going to write about a popular new game, how it came to my attention and my impressions and thoughts once I had purchased it. But while reflecting on one aspect of the game; the social element that stems from playing with friends, I realised I had more to say about this rather than just writing a review. But such is the nature of writing. In my experience my train of thought is seldom linear. So this post has now morphed into some musings about social gaming and how it is an integral aspect of modern game design. Because playing games with friends is often regarded as a superior experience to playing alone. At least by game developers. I think that the reality is more nuanced and dependent on the game in question. However, I do think that some games are better played with people you know and that playing on your own or in a PUG is less fun. Because that has been my experience of late.
This post started out as something completely different. I was simply going to write about a popular new game, how it came to my attention and my impressions and thoughts once I had purchased it. But while reflecting on one aspect of the game; the social element that stems from playing with friends, I realised I had more to say about this rather than just writing a review. But such is the nature of writing. In my experience my train of thought is seldom linear. So this post has now morphed into some musings about social gaming and how it is an integral aspect of modern game design. Because playing games with friends is often regarded as a superior experience to playing alone. At least by game developers. I think that the reality is more nuanced and dependent on the game in question. However, I do think that some games are better played with people you know and that playing on your own or in a PUG is less fun. Because that has been my experience of late.
Now the “buzz” surrounding Fall Guys: Ultimate Knockout reached my social media timeline a few days after the games release on August 4th. As I already play a Battle Royale game (Call of Duty Warzone) I didn’t feel the need to investigate the new game any further. However, after several YouTube channels that I subscribe to reviewed the game positively, I decided to delve a little deeper. So I watched some live streamers play the game and quickly decided to give Fall Guys: Ultimate Knockout a go. Mainly because everyone I saw playing it was having fun. The game has a cartoon-like aesthetic and the collision physics are endlessly amusing. But what stands out the most from all the video footage of gameplay I’ve seen, is that it engenders a sense of communal fun. That kind of “in the moment”, organic enjoyment that stems from friends being together and sharing an experience.
And that is exactly the opposite experience to what I’ve had. Although Fall Guys: Ultimate Knockout is most definitely fun, playing like a cross between “Takeshi’s Castle” and “It’s a Knockout/Jeux sans frontières”, it does feel like something is missing when you play solo. There’s no one to share the moment with when you fail spectacularly, or run “interference” against other players if you’re having difficulty. Choosing an exotic costume becomes somewhat arbitrary as a single player, compared to the mirth it creates when riffing off friends. Outside of Fall Guys: Ultimate Knockout, there are benefits to be had from playing socially in other games. I enjoy Call of Duty Warzone but when I watch live streams and YouTube videos, you cannot deny that the game can be played far more effectively in co-ordinated groups. You just don’t get that with PUGS, which usually range from adequate to “herding cats” to mental torture.
The summit of my social interaction in video games is when I play MMORPGs. I’ve been in the same kinship in The Lord of the Rings Online since 2009 and still regularly enjoy organised gameplay via Discord. Although this is fun, it is limited to just one game and the nature of MMOs doesn’t really lend itself to a great deal of diverse experiences. I haven’t played any games from other genres with friends and people I know since 2016. The last time was when there was an organised game night via The Newbie Blogger Initiative and a few people got together and played Overwatch. Since then I’ve just used the auto grouping option in the games that I play. It’s not so much an issue of a lack of friends but the fact that no one seems to be playing the same games as me (and vice versa). The fact that not all games support crossplay is another factor.
I also suspect that age may well have a bearing on this. Younger people tend to have larger, active social circles. These decline over time, something I have written about in the past. Now naturally my online friends play and enjoy video games. It’s usually one of the reasons why I follow someone on Twitter. But many of the people I know locally, despite being of a comparable age to me, don’t play video games. They tend to be interested in more traditional leisure activities like football, reading tabloids and casual bigotry. So upon mature reflection, despite there being a focus on social gaming as a source of fun by the industry itself, my reality is not the same. Returning to Fall Guys: Ultimate Knockout for example, my experience is not like those who play in a group. It’s like being at a party where you drink and move around the periphery of events, laughing at jokes you overhear but not actively participating in any meaningful interaction. It’s an odd sort of fun by osmosis, just by dint of being present. Social gaming alone, as it were. And I’m beginning to tire of it.
It’s Not Losing That’s the Problem But How You Lose
The title of this post doesn’t really cover what I’m trying to express but it’s the best I could come up with that wasn’t an essay in itself. Now I’m going to try to be as brief as possible, as I know sometimes I write too much and get bogged down in the minutiae. Hopeful you’ll follow my train of thought. So to begin, some video games have a very specific fail mechanic. If you play Mortal Kombat either against bots or with another player, there can be only one winner. If it’s not you then you have lost. It’s the same in Call of Duty Warzone if you play Battle Royal Mode. Looking to other genres such as MMOs, if you don’t defeat the boss at the end of the raid and your team wipes, then again you’ve lost. But this doesn’t have to be a problem. The player knows in advance exactly what the criteria for winning is. You lose due to the mechanics of the game, the skill of other players or the lack of your own.
The title of this post doesn’t really cover what I’m trying to express but it’s the best I could come up with that wasn’t an essay in itself. Now I’m going to try to be as brief as possible, as I know sometimes I write too much and get bogged down in the minutiae. Hopeful you’ll follow my train of thought. So to begin, some video games have a very specific fail mechanic. If you play Mortal Kombat either against bots or with another player, there can be only one winner. If it’s not you then you have lost. It’s the same in Call of Duty Warzone if you play Battle Royal Mode. Looking to other genres such as MMOs, if you don’t defeat the boss at the end of the raid and your team wipes, then again you’ve lost. But this doesn’t have to be a problem. The player knows in advance exactly what the criteria for winning is. You lose due to the mechanics of the game, the skill of other players or the lack of your own.
As a man of a certain age, I tend not to get too annoyed when I lose playing video games. More often than not what frustrates me is my own incompetence and poor reactions. I am more often than not, the architect of my own demise. And when I play any sort of game in a pick up group, I lower my expectations by default. Sometimes I’ll find myself in a group that plays as a team, follows a strategy and performs well. All of which is done with the minimum of conversation, be it text or voice. On occasions it goes the other way where the selfish behaviour and stupidity of some players actively impede your progress and this is something I find less palatable. A point I shall return to in a moment. Overall failure and losing are an inherent part of video games. Hopefully you learn from your mistakes and “git gud” or something like that. Also, although I’m not exactly enamoured by elitist gaming culture or like over competitive people (they’re so tediously wearing), winning too easily or too often does mitigate the point of certain types of games.
Still with me? Good. I’m nearly at my point. To summarise, losing is an integral part of gaming although you don’t have to like it. It is an important component that contributes to the overall environment from which the fun, enjoyment or whatever else you get from video games derives. It is not malevolent per se. However, there is another kind of losing or fail state that comes via a human agency. It is predatory in nature and happens when you lose because someone decided to mess with you. It’s the gaming equivalent of someone coughing or nudging you when you’re playing darts and about to throw. This manifests itself in PVP and survival games when players predate other new or less knowledgeable players. Or in racing games when one player knows they will not win so willfully causes carnage or tries to block others. I saw such behaviour today while watching someone streaming Fall Guys: Ultimate Knockout. At first glance this looks a very benign game but it would appear that players will wait at the finishing line to try and stop people from crossing. Even in a easygoing, fun environment such as this, there are still people who want to fuck with you.
And therein is the issue. Life is problematic enough because some people just aren’t happy unless they’re doing something to others. Do we really need this in our game space as well? I don’t mind losing, failing or getting beaten in a game by its mechanics or more skilled players. But I don’t want to be inconvenienced because someone just wants to fuck with me for the sake of just doing so. And this is where I trot out my standard argument about how being a paying customer changes the dynamics of gaming. Forget notional ideas about freedom of expression and emergent gameplay. The moment money is paid, I expect rules and parameters to constrain others bullshit shenanigans. The same way when I go swimming at the sports centre and racing competitively, no one is allowed to enter my lane and mess with me.
Irrespective of what genre(s) of game you play, I think we can all make the distinction between losing in an intended fashion IE falling foul of a game’s fail state mechanics and having something done to you by some asshole. It’s paradoxical that developers will always sing from the rooftops about the superiority of playing with and against real people and then subsequently being utterly flabbergasted by the fact that people treat each other abominably. But players will happily indulge in sociopathic behaviour if given an opportunity. Look at the recurring problem with aimbots that plague popular FPS games. As for losing “building character”, that’s a bogus term and a flawed philosophy. But losing in the manner discussed is an object lesson in why so many problems in life are just people problems. As a society, we still await a solution to this, although judicious use of a claw hammer as a correctional tool is a good place to start.
Choo Choo
Adding a train to a Battle Royale game is hardly a new concept. Both Apex Legends and PlayerUnknown’s Battleground have successfully done this. So it was only a matter of time before one was added to Call of Duty Warzone. We were tipped off by the addition of train tracks last season. The launch of Season 5 this week finally made the “choo choo” a reality. I must admit, I’m quite surprised at how adding something as straightforward as a freight train has reinvigorated the game. That and the fact that you can now access the stadium seems to have really enthused the playerbase. Since Tuesday, whenever you play Warzone or one of its variants, a large number of players head straight to the stadium or the station where the armoured freight train starts its journey around the map. As a result of this, new players or those who aren’t so skilled in combat can navigate the outlying areas of Verdansk with a greater degree of freedom and safety. Everyone else is at either of those locations.
Adding a train to a Battle Royale game is hardly a new concept. Both Apex Legends and PlayerUnknown’s Battleground have successfully done this. So it was only a matter of time before one was added to Call of Duty Warzone. We were tipped off by the addition of train tracks last season. The launch of Season 5 this week finally made the “choo choo” a reality. I must admit, I’m quite surprised at how adding something as straightforward as a freight train has reinvigorated the game. That and the fact that you can now access the stadium seems to have really enthused the playerbase. Since Tuesday, whenever you play Warzone or one of its variants, a large number of players head straight to the stadium or the station where the armoured freight train starts its journey around the map. As a result of this, new players or those who aren’t so skilled in combat can navigate the outlying areas of Verdansk with a greater degree of freedom and safety. Everyone else is at either of those locations.
I try and avoid the stadium as it has too many open corridors and because of the rewards that can be found there, too many skilled players. I see no reason to provide an easy target for such individuals. Let them prey on their own. The train however is a more interesting proposition. It again offers the orange supply crates which contain the best weapons and gear. But it also provides a means to navigate the map and potentially flank enemies. It can also offer a degree of cover and I’ve used it as a means of escaping difficult firefights several times. Contrary to popular belief, strategically withdrawing is a sound option in Warzone. Another great aspect of the train is that it provides endless opportunities to mess about with friends. I’ve already seen videos of players parking as many vehicles as possible to try and derail the train. They quickly discovered that it is unstoppable.
Plunder is my game of choice in Warzone and I’ve developed my own short term strategy for the train. I suspect that after a week or two it will no longer be viable as the overall meta strategy of most players will alter. As present, most players head for the train as soon as they parachute into Verdansk and congregate at the station. Hence for the first stretch of its journey, the train is smothered in players. However after about 4 minutes or so, as the train passes the eastern side of the Hospital, it enters a tunnel. This leads to the Great Bridge area where the track follows the perimeter of the International Airport and Maintenance Block. You can wait above the tunnel exit and subsequently ambush any players remaining on the train. Admittedly many have gone by this point but there’s usually two or three. You can then jump down onto the train. If you miss the chance to do so, there’s a quad bike nearby so you can catch up. You can’t outrun the train.
This is a good way to start a game. At the very least it's a way to get some easy kills and collect some gear. If the players you’ve disposed of have already looted the orange supply crates, then you will get some good gear. If they haven’t then you’ll at least get some money and one armour plate. After I’ve collected any loot, I move to the front of the train which has the best cover and then find an appropriate location to get off. There are houses around the perimeter of the airport and these offer a good place to snipe at those fighting around the hangers. I tend not to stay on the train any longer as there are further bridges ahead and sooner or later, someone else will decide to get on. Conversely, if you do not wish to loot the train, then the route I’ve mentioned offers ideal high ground and cover to attack those on it. Both options keep me amused, however I think that players will soon adjust their strategy to counter this. But that’s what I like about Warzone. Both the developers and the players continually find ways to change things and keep the game fluid.
Exclusivity: A Play in One Act
Unscrupulous Video Game Developer: Hey you. Would you like to play an action-adventure video game based on the Marvel’s Avengers franchise?
Mildly Interested Gamer: Sure. Sound’s cool. What platform will it be available on?
Unscrupulous Video Game Developer: All of them!
Mildly Interested Gamer: Great.
Unscrupulous Video Game Developer: It gets better. After the launch, there'll be free DLC of additional playable characters.
Mildly Interested Gamer: No way!
Unscrupulous Video Game Developer: Hey you. Would you like to play an action-adventure video game based on the Marvel’s Avengers franchise?
Mildly Interested Gamer: Sure. Sound’s cool. What platform will it be available on?
Unscrupulous Video Game Developer: All of them!
Mildly Interested Gamer: Great.
Unscrupulous Video Game Developer: It gets better. After the launch, there'll be free DLC of additional playable characters.
Mildly Interested Gamer: No way!
Unscrupulous Video Game Developer: Yes away. First up we got Hawkeye.
Mildly Interested Gamer: Oh okay…
Unscrupulous Video Game Developer: And then we got Spider-Man
Mildly Interested Gamer: Outstanding. I’ll go pre-order my Xbox copy now and get me some of that Spider-Man action.
Unscrupulous Video Game Developer: Oh, sorry. Spider-Man is a Playstation exclusive.
Mildly Interested Gamer: Say what?
Unscrupulous Video Game Developer: Yeah. Spider-Man is only going to be available to owners of the Playstation version of the game.
Mildly Interested Gamer: Well that fucking sucks. How do you justify this shit?
Unscrupulous Video Game Developer: It says here in my “Marketing Guide to Tough Questions” that the standard answer is “that’s capitalism, bitch”. Plus Sony owns the rights to Spider-Man and Marvel were happy to go along with this “arrangement”.
Mildly Interested Gamer: But that’s so unfair. It’s like you’re punishing gamers that didn’t buy a Playstation.
Unscrupulous Video Game Developer: Not at all. We’re offering exclusivity and creating value. Admittedly we’re doing this by devaluing the product on competing platforms but we’re pretty sure we can get away with this. We’re even hoping that some gamers will buy a second console just so they can play as Spider-Man.
Mildly Interested Gamer: What makes you think that will happen?
Unscrupulous Video Game Developer: Because gamers such as you have a track record of being what we call in the business “fucking gullible”. You buy into all our “promises”, give us your money upfront before we’ve even finished a game and then you happily keep paying for baubles and trinkets while we pretend to fix the problems we created.
Mildly Interested Gamer: You sonofabitch…
Unscrupulous Video Game Developer: And for all your posturing and complaining, you keep coming back like a Golden Retriever that’s desperate to please its owner after shitting on the carpet.
Mildly Interested Gamer: Fuck you. Not this time.
Unscrupulous Video Game Developer: Oh you will. You always do. It never ceases to amaze us as we sit around at night in our volcano lair, counting all our money, that the only reason we get away with so much is because you let us. You pathetic fools.
Mildly Interested Gamer: That’s it, I’m done.I’m quitting games. I’m going to keep bees.
Unscrupulous Video Game Developer: Really? Would you like to pre-order a Marvel themed virtual hive?
A Month in Gaming
As I mentioned in the last instalment of “A Month in Gaming”, I was toying with the idea of buying Ghost Recon Breakpoint. However, I have decided against that. Yes the game may well be a third person, co-operative shooter but ultimately it’s yet more explosions and military hardware fetishism, which isn’t anything new. I have more than enough of that at present with Call of Duty Modern Warfare/Warzone. I also don’t feel disposed towards giving Ubisoft any of my money at the moment, until they get their house in order. I am so tired of continuously reading about how shitty the video game industry is to work in. It’s difficult to protest in a meaningful way but I guess for the present not buying a product is as good a way as any. So rather than purchasing any further games, I decided in July to play at least one of the many titles I’ve got in my existing library.
As I mentioned in the last instalment of “A Month in Gaming”, I was toying with the idea of buying Ghost Recon Breakpoint. However, I have decided against that. Yes the game may well be a third person, co-operative shooter but ultimately it’s yet more explosions and military hardware fetishism, which isn’t anything new. I have more than enough of that at present with Call of Duty Modern Warfare/Warzone. I also don’t feel disposed towards giving Ubisoft any of my money at the moment, until they get their house in order. I am so tired of continuously reading about how shitty the video game industry is to work in. It’s difficult to protest in a meaningful way but I guess for the present not buying a product is as good a way as any. So rather than purchasing any further games, I decided in July to play at least one of the many titles I’ve got in my existing library.
After perusing my existing catalogue of games, I decided to install The Sinking City. I’ve enjoyed Frogware’s Sherlock Holmes games and this title includes many of the systems and mechanics from that franchise. It’s a Lovecraftian themed investigation game, set in a semi-open world environment. The emphasis is on dialogue trees, finding clues and then making the correct deductions via the “Mind Palace” system. There is much to like about the game and the plot, visuals and general ambience is steeped in the Cthulhu Mythos. However, despite the city being large, a lot of assets are repeated, traversing the streets is difficult as many are submerged and you can only interact with about a quarter of the NPCs that you meet. Combat is also very clunky as you cannot rapidly fire any of the guns. Yet despite these issues, the game has a charm about it. The developers may have over reached in some respects but they totally nail the essence of Lovecraft’s work.
Ironically, I decided to return to The Lord of the Rings Online in late July and catch up with some of the outstanding content I’ve yet to complete. I thought it best to try and get The Great Wedding out of the way, something I’m not especially interested in, so I could then continue with the Wells of Langflood. However, the server outage that plagued the game for nearly a fortnight put pay to that plan. It was a timely reminder of how Standing Stone Games seem to flounder when it comes to communication and customer relations. The situation also led to me visiting both the official and unofficial LOTRO forums for news. Despite me not being active on either of these platforms for several years, nothing appears to have really changed with either communities. Both seem to exhibit the exactly the same “problems” that they’ve always had with “overzealous” fans and fandom.
As to my plans for August, I may catch up with some of the new Klingon themed content that has recently been added to Star Trek Online. The yearly summer festival starts shortly, offering a Risian Weather Control Vessel as the prize. It’s a Tier 6 Escort Class but I’ve reached the point in the game where I don’t really feel the need to grind for another ship. Season 5 of Call of Duty Warzone is also imminent and I still haven’t decided whether or not I shall buy the new Battle Pass. I’ve played the game constantly for 4 months and I’m not certain if I can sustain my interest. However, Infinity Ward are well versed at altering the game map, adding new play modes and weapons, so I may be able to stay engaged. I suspect that I may once again look towards my existing game library for further entertainment in the weeks ahead. I have so many titles that remain untouched.
Never the Twain Shall Meet?
Video games can offer a great opportunity for personal growth. If you are the sort of player who likes to prove themselves and continuously test one’s mettle, then some titles can provide the challenge required to be the best of the best. Hence many games are competitive, have league tables and other formal structures for measuring success. It is one of the reasons why esports have become so popular. But this desire to excel and master a particular play style extends beyond competitive games. For some players part of a games allure is understanding the numbers and stats that drive the game mechanics. Because these are often the key to optimising your build and maximising DPS output. Hence you will find skilled and learned players in a variety of games across multiple genres. Although they are often motivated for different reasons, they all strive to be elite players.
Video games can offer a great opportunity for personal growth. If you are the sort of player who likes to prove themselves and continuously test one’s mettle, then some titles can provide the challenge required to be the best of the best. Hence many games are competitive, have league tables and other formal structures for measuring success. It is one of the reasons why esports have become so popular. But this desire to excel and master a particular play style extends beyond competitive games. For some players part of a games allure is understanding the numbers and stats that drive the game mechanics. Because these are often the key to optimising your build and maximising DPS output. Hence you will find skilled and learned players in a variety of games across multiple genres. Although they are often motivated for different reasons, they all strive to be elite players.
I have been playing video games in some shape or form since the coin-op days of the eighties. But I have never been anything more than an average player. Plus I am motivated primarily by having fun and have never seen any game as some sort of personal trial or path to spiritual enlightenment. That’s not to say that I don’t try and attempt to improve. I just know that I won’t progress beyond a certain level of ability because the fun to work ratio will no longer be to my liking. And I’m not alone in this and have written before about how I believe the majority of gamers are “average” with regard to skill. Which brings me to my point. If you look at the skilled, top tier gamers and the average players in terms of a venn diagram, then there’s not a lot of overlap. Depending on the genre of game, I think that overlap reduces even further.
I joined a kinship (guild) in The Lord of the Rings Online in 2009 and I’m still in it. It has some extremely knowledgeable players who are skilled at multiple classes. Occasionally we will do group content and these players will “coach” (or even carry) the less able players. They are often already familiar with the dungeon or raid in question because they’ve completed it numerous time’s with their skilled peers. They spend the majority of their time with players of comparable abilities. When they do help out with what I shall politely call “The B Team”, I often become acutely aware of the disparity in skill and DPS. Hence the Ralph Wiggum meme at the top of this post. And once the group content is done they politely withdraw and go back to “swimming at the deep end of the pool”. The social panel in LOTRO tells players where their friends and colleagues are and whether they’re in a group. These folk are always busy doing the “hard stuff”.
At least in the MMO genre, you may occasionally encounter top tier players. I find that in other genres such as FPS games, there is clear segregation based on skill. When I play Call of Duty Modern Warfare Multiplayer, I will frequently play game styles and specific maps that do much to level the playing field. The small confined space of the “Shipment” map means that there’s scope to get by on luck and sporting a loadout that allows you to fire from the hip. Although I do encounter good players who are well versed in tactics and have good reactions, there is a chance to counter them. But I find that the players I encounter in Battle Royale and Plunder mode are broadly comparable to myself. Let it suffice to say that the quality of players I see in the various YouTube clip shows that I watch, have never crossed my path. Not that I’m complaining. Players should be grouped with those of similar skill.
Now I’m not advocating that this naturally occurring segregation of gamers based upon skill is a bad thing. Skilled players mainly prefer the company of their peers. Average players do not like being “target practise” and “cannon fodder” for the elite. And both groups are paying customers and as such should be afforded an experience that they enjoy. But it is curious how gaming is often spoken of as a shared experience and something that a wide variety of people have in common, when the reality is far more compartmentalised. Most MMO players have never participated in a raid. Many of those who enjoy the Battle Royale genre have yet to win a game. The reality is that a lot of video game content is never played, exotic weapons remain locked and achievements, accolades and deeds are left incomplete. Although we are united by the fact that we all play video games, that is where the common ground both starts and ends.
LOTRO: Over a Week of Downtime
The MMORPG The Lord of the Rings Online has been plagued by technical problems for over a week now, resulting in multiple servers being offline. The game’s official forums have also been intermittently affected by these ongoing issues, as has Standing Stone Games other MMO, Dungeon and Dragons Online. The problems initially started on Wednesday the 15th of July with severe lag, rubberbanding and random client disconnections. LOTRO has had ongoing issues with all of these problems in the past and developers SSG have attempted to address them numerous times. It was hoped that the release of a 64 bit client last summer would improve matters and initially there were indications of performance improvements. However, the specific poor server performance that was identified last week has allegedly “cascaded” throughout SSG’s infrastructure.
The MMORPG The Lord of the Rings Online has been plagued by technical problems for over a week now, resulting in multiple servers being offline. The game’s official forums have also been intermittently affected by these ongoing issues, as has Standing Stone Games other MMO, Dungeon and Dragons Online. The problems initially started on Wednesday the 15th of July with severe lag, rubberbanding and random client disconnections. LOTRO has had ongoing issues with all of these problems in the past and developers SSG have attempted to address them numerous times. It was hoped that the release of a 64 bit client last summer would improve matters and initially there were indications of performance improvements. However, the specific poor server performance that was identified last week has allegedly “cascaded” throughout SSG’s infrastructure.
At present the specific nature of the “problem” remains unknown and somewhat nebulous. Furthermore it is likely to remain that way as SSG and prior to them Turbine, have never felt the need to provide details of technical outages. Now that is not exactly an unusual position to take as most companies do not feel the need to discuss infrastructure failings with their customer base. The matter may well be complicated by SLAs with 3rd party vendors etc. Businesses also have to deal with a great deal or internal politics and legal obligations. In this case SSG may well be constrained by policies set by their publishers (and pay masters) Daybreak Games. However, what is customary in such situations is for the “problem” to be handled by whatever internal departments handle communications and community management. Difficult situations like this become a “PR opportunity”.
The “problem” has come back…
Sadly, community management, interacting with the player base and providing reassurance is not SSGs strong point. In the past nine days there have been a litany of Twitter and Facebook posts about servers going on and offline. There have also been a few short messages apologising for the inconvenience. This is certainly civil but it really does seem like the bare minimum. The LOTRO player community is both seasoned and loyal. They are also extremely forgiving of these sorts of technical issues because they endured them before on more than one occasion. To use an old British colloquialism SSG and Turbine before them, have “form”. But it is a mistake for the game’s developers to rely too heavily on players' good will. 2020 has not been a “good year” so far and gamers per se may not be as “affable” as they usually are. At this point a little more transparency and frankly credible customer relations would be useful.
Are players asking for rash promises regarding technical solutions? No. Are they asking SSG to breach rules regarding disclosure and confidentiality? No. They’re looking for a simple, concise explanation as to the broad nature of the “problem”. They’re also looking for a reason to get behind the technical staff who I’m sure are working extremely hard under pressured circumstances. We appreciate that a bullet proof ETA on a solution is not practical. But regular, sincere updates on progress would be very reassuring. Everyone knows what’s at stake. We know that downtime means no one is playing and if no one is playing, then no one is paying. A drop in revenues is not good for any MMO. But SSG need to realise that the immense goodwill of their players that they have benefitted from for the last decade is not an infinite commodity. They need to communicate and keep everyone onboard, rather than push players away due to perceived indifference.
I have often reiterated the point that the LOTRO community should not overlook that they are consumers, as well as ardent fans. They may not immediately see both DDO and LOTRO as services but ultimately they are, the same as gas, electricity or your cell phone. So its is reasonable to have consumer expectations. Another point to consider is that good will needs to be maintained on both sides. A loss of revenue seldom pleases those who control the purse strings but if community relations are good, then the bean counters may well feel positive about the community returning and spending. If community relations sour, then a gap in the balance sheet and concerns over players not investing in the game, could contribute to more detrimental decisions being made. I therefore hope that SSG improves its PR and that LOTRO players keep their heads. The downtime is a frustration for all. I wish SSG staff well with the “problem”. But sometimes it’s not just about solving a problem but also how you handle it.
Busy Doing Nothing
As I mentioned recently in my monthly gaming roundup, I’ve currently stopped playing the three MMORPGs that are my usual gaming mainstay. Namely The Lord of the Rings Online, The Elder Scrolls Online and Star Trek Online. It’s something that I do from time to time when I’m tired of the repetition this genre offers. At present none of these titles has anything on offer that motivates me to play them enthusiastically. Especially LOTRO. I find weddings tedious and self indulgent in real life, so I’m hardly going to get “excited” about a virtual one set in Middle-earth. However, that’s not to say that I’ve lost interest in the MMO genre. I’m merely temporarily burned out at present. I find that after a few months or so, either new content is released that lures me back to these games or I tire of what I’ve been playing in their stead. It’s a cyclical process that I go through from time to time and nothing to worry about.
If you’ve figured out this tenuous movie reference then give yourself a pat on the back
As I mentioned recently in my monthly gaming roundup, I’ve currently stopped playing the three MMORPGs that are my usual gaming mainstay. Namely The Lord of the Rings Online, The Elder Scrolls Online and Star Trek Online. It’s something that I do from time to time when I’m tired of the repetition this genre offers. At present none of these titles has anything on offer that motivates me to play them enthusiastically. Especially LOTRO. I find weddings tedious and self indulgent in real life, so I’m hardly going to get “excited” about a virtual one set in Middle-earth. However, that’s not to say that I’ve lost interest in the MMO genre. I’m merely temporarily burned out at present. I find that after a few months or so, either new content is released that lures me back to these games or I tire of what I’ve been playing in their stead. It’s a cyclical process that I go through from time to time and nothing to worry about.
However, despite the fact I’m not actively playing these games, it’s surprising how they still manage to keep me busy. How do they keep me busy, I hear you ask? Have I not deleted them from my hard drive? Of course not, that’s crazy talk. Before I move on to the various tasks involved in not playing a game, let me first address this ludicrous assumption that if you’re not playing a game you can delete it from your hard drive and reinstall it later. Because we all have fast internet connections nowadays? Well for starters let me list the current installation size of these three MMOs. LOTRO 30.1GB, ESO 71.7GB and STO 35.5GB respectively. Those are not “small beer” and irrespective of your internet connection speed, if you wish to install these games from scratch you’re at the mercy of three separate game clients and three sets of patching servers. All of which are painfully slow and temperamental. So unless you desperately need to reclaim the space on your SSD or HDD, never delete a game just co’s you’re not playing it at present. Don’t even get me started on customisations and addons.
Moving on, these unplayed MMOs need constant tending. There’s constant patching, especially for ESO who seem to release new content based on two criteria; when it’s raining and when it’s not. Rather than be inconvenienced when I finally decide to return to these games by finding a ton of updates to download, it’s best to keep the client current just in case. And then there’s the login presents and rewards. Both LOTRO and ESO giveaway daily incentives or “free shit” as it’s called in marketing parlance, to encourage consumer loyalty. I may not be playing at present but FOMO is a real thing. I’d hate to pass up on a one off opportunity to claim the “Sword of Kagnazax” or a cosmetic Humboldt Squid pet. I’m also a member of at least one guild that regularly kicks players if they don’t log into the game after a set period of time. So I have to show a face, so to speak, at least once a week or I’ll be given my “marching orders”.
Blogging about these games also adds to the every growing list of chores. Just because I’m not actively playing through current content doesn’t mean that I have nothing to say on the state of any of these three titles or regarding any breaking story or development associated with them. Which leads me to my next point, I often find myself without a suitable screen capture that I can use to illustrate a post. So I have to quickly log into the game in question and grab a few images. And of course you don’t get to just “log on and then log off”. There’s invariably someone online who spots you and decides to engage you in lengthy conversation regarding your health, what you’ve been up to and that wretched bird on Mrs Coltart’s roof (yet again). So as you can see, it can be quite exhausting not playing games. Talk about busy doing nothing. It’s amazing I find time for the games I actually am engaged with at present.