The Alts We Do Not Level

View fullsize

There are many factors that can add to an MMORPGs replayability. Multiple races, classes and factions can all potentially offer a new experience to the player. Some games even have unique stories associated with different types of characters, ensuring that rolling a new alt means that the player doesn’t repeat material they’ve already completed. Many gamers enjoy this aspect of the genre and will experiment with different builds, resulting in a character selection screen filled with numerous alts in various states of progress. However, irrespective of whether you get to experience a new story or if you indeed like the new character you’ve created, there comes a point when you look at your new alts progression and reflect upon the long, long journey to level cap. It is at this point that many alts fall by the wayside. The aforementioned character selection screen is often populated with unfulfilled potential.

Some MMOs make levelling a new alt a relatively easy experience. Star Trek Online is very generous with experience points and a player can level a new character to level cap (65) over a weekend if they’re diligent. The Elder Scrolls Online similarly does not make levelling an alt to 50 a chore. Dolmen farming in the Alik’r Desert is an expedient alternative to playing through story content. The Lord of the Rings Online is a horse of a different colour and even though much of the early content in the game has been streamlined for fast levelling, progression can slow down once the player arrives in Rohan. At present the biggest levelling bottleneck is Mordor, which has a massive change in difficulty compared to previous content. However, MMOs are not just about the journey to level cap. As and when you arrive there is the issue of obtaining appropriate gear. Depending on the game this may mean working your way through various reputation progressions to get your hands on what you need or spending a fortune on the auction house. Further reasons why so many alts never arrive at cap.

View fullsize

However, many game developers have a “solution” to these levelling issues. Rather than seeing a mid level alt, languishing in the doldrums as an indictment of their game design, they prefer to interpret it as a business opportunity to sell the player a boost to level cap. Needless to say, such “services” divide the player base. Some see this as a convenience and a way to quickly get a new alt to level cap without the grind. Others see it as a game breaking anathema and a personal slight against their entire life and value system. And then there are those who don’t really give a shit either way. More often than not, if an alt has been abandoned then there are usually good reasons for it. It’s play style may not be to our taste or it may have failed to meet our expectations. Perhaps we didn’t like the associated story. Whatever the reason, once sidelined, abandoned alts are seldom returned to.

View fullsize

So what of my superfluous alts? Well I tend not to have that many. Once I find a class in an MMO that I like, I tend to go all in and focus on it. However, I do from time to time experiment. Currently in ESO I have an Argonian Necromancer, who is just kicking his heels in Shadowfen. I decided to create a new Dragonkinght and take them through the game’s entire story in narrative order. Hence the Necromancer got sidelined. In LOTRO my Dwarf Hunter is loitering around the crafting hall in Bree. Crafting eventually became too complex and so he remains a fixture next to the forge, doomed to stay at level 105. However, things are more fortunate for my new Gorn Captain in STO. He is permanently stationed in the Vlugta Asteroid Field, mining and refining Dilithium ore. It may not be the most glorious of destinies but it beats not being used at all. Such is the fate of the alts we do not level. What do you do with yours?

LOTRO: Password Reset for Dormant Accounts

View fullsize

“Is it secret? Is it safe?”

Here’s a nugget of information that passed under the radar, or at least it passed under mine. The following post appeared on the official LOTRO forums last week regarding resetting password on dormant player accounts. “As part of our effort to keep people's game accounts secure we have reset the passwords for all game accounts that have not been logged into in more than two years. Your game account and all of its data remains intact! In order to log in, you will need to reset your password through the Forgot My Password? reset procedure. To further help protect your account, we also recommend that you regularly update your password details, and never share your password with anyone. If you need further assistance, please contact Account Support”. Cordovan (Community Manager).

I am not directly affected by this situation as I regularly log in to The Lord of the Rings Online, regardless of whether I am actively playing or not. I do so to take screen captures for posts, check on new content added to the game or to see if there have been any messages left by kinship members. However, I know lots of people who have not logged into the game for 24 months but do not consider themselves “done” with the game. From a players perspective, two years may not seem like an especially long period of time to be absent from LOTRO. Real world events may mean that they can’t play at present or they may be awaiting a specific expansion or some new content. However, from a game developer’s point of view, an account that has been inactive for two years is not only not playing the game but not spending money. Such data must be very telling and certainly must give SSG food for thought.

View fullsize

Dormant, not Dormouse…

I understand why SSG has decided to reset the passwords on such accounts from a security perspective. But I also think that this situation presents a golden opportunity to do some proactive public relations work and marketing. In the past Cryptic, developers of the MMORPG Star Trek Online, would email players with dormant accounts and offer them incentives to return to the game. This would sometimes be a rare ship that wasn't available elsewhere. I’m not sure how effective this approach was but you would  see these unique ships in-game and know that it belonged to a returning player. Would it really be too much to ask for SSG to adopt a similar approach and to offer an incentive to those players who have drifted away from LOTRO to return? Alternatively, if targeting lapsed players is too controversial (as there would naturally be complaints from some current players), why not run a welcome back event with benefits available to all? As ever with LOTRO and SSG, such obvious ideas remain conspicuously absent.

LOTRO to End Support for Windows XP

View fullsize

"The Lord of the Rings Online will be deprecating support for Windows XP and earlier operating systems as of June 8th, 2021. All of your characters and progress will remain, and you can continue to play the game by running LOTRO on a Windows 7 or newer operating system. Players who need to can contact Account Support at help.standingstonegames.com. Thank you" Cordovan. If my time working in IT has taught me anything, it’s that once someone has found a computer setup that works for them and that they’re comfortable with, they’ll move heaven and earth to keep it. Not everyone is an early adopter. Not everyone upgrades just because an upgrade is available. Money is also a major factor. £100 may be a trivial amount to one person but a month’s wages to another. Bearing all this in mind, it is fair to say that not everyone upgrades their hardware or software willy-nilly. Hence it is not unusual to find PC’s running Windows XP in peoples homes.

However, Microsoft officially ended support for Windows XP on April 8th, 2014. So I am quite surprised that Standing Stone Games has still been supporting LOTRO on this operating system for so long after it was formally retired by the manufacturer. Considering there have been four further iterations of Windows since XP, SSG are certainly justified in their decision to draw a line under this particular version. Certainly, if the game is to evolve and have the graphical upgrade that has been suggested, along with a port to the current generation of consoles, it cannot be restricted by a requirement to run on older hardware and software. I doubt if they’ll do it but I would be very interested to know exactly what percentage of LOTRO players are still running the game on this operating system. I suspect it may be more than what many people think.

View fullsize

This raises the question as to what players affected by this change will do. A license key for Windows 10 can cost anything from £35 to £140. There are deals to be had from grey market vendors if you search online. However, if you have a PC that came with Windows XP installed, it will be between 12 and 20 years old. Are the hardware specifications of such systems going to cope with the latest iteration of Windows 10? If so, the need to upgrade an operating system could end up as a need to buy a new PC. Will people do that just to play LOTRO? Linux enthusiasts will happily inform anyone with a pulse that it will run on an abacus and that it also supports LOTRO. But not everyone wants to go down such an alternative route. In the meantime, I’ll be keeping an eye on the LOTRO forums to see what sort of feedback this announcement generates and how supportive SSG are of those affected by this imminent change.

LOTRO: Five Things I Do Not Use Anymore

View fullsize

I logged into The Lord of the Rings Online today and started sorting through my inventory and vault on my primary character, which is a level cap Lore-master. After 14 years and a great deal of change, it’s hardly surprising that an MMO such as LOTRO generates so much bric-a-brac and superfluous items. Much of which is obsolete or only of use for a very short period of time while levelling. Much of this junk is linked to wider systems and mechanics in the game that are no longer relevant or at the least are no longer as important to the game as it has grown and expanded. In fact, off the top of my head, here are five aspects of LOTRO that were a big deal at one point during the games lifecycle (indeed some were major selling points) but now are not essential as you progress through the game. Certainly they don’t necessarily have any major bearing upon the average LOTRO player (follow the link for a discussion about this particular definition) with an alt at level cap. 

Mounted Combat, War-steed and War Wolf. I can remember when the Riders of Rohan expansion was being touted by then developer Turbine and the concept of mounted combat was referenced as being the alleged Holy Grail among players. All I could think of at the time was that I hadn't asked for it. When it finally arrived it was clunky, with steering your War-steed especially difficult with heavier mounts. For some classes, being on horseback was utterly absurd and far from fun. But what cannot be cured must be endured, so many players just got on with it. However once the expansion was completed I and others never touched this mechanic ever again. Hence I have never bought any further cosmetic items for my War-steed because why would I do that for something I don’t use? My only regret is that I didn’t get much use out of the War Wolf companion that the Lore-master gets through traiting in a specific fashion.

Cosmetic Items. I’ve said it before and I will say it again and again. Cosmetic outfit options for the Lore-master class in LOTRO are very limited. You can either look like Ming the Merciless or Rick Wakeman during his cape fetish era from when he was in Yes. Neither look appeals to me. Despite the fact that the developers added the ability to wear non-class related items cosmetically, a long time ago, there is precious little that looks sartorially appropriate for the Lore-master. So after finding about three outfits that I can live with, I don’t believe I’ve altered my primary alts appearance for over half a decade.

View fullsize

Landscape Soldier. Due to power creep and finally having obtained some good quality gear, I no longer use my Landscape Soldier any more in LOTRO, unless there is a unique situation that requires it. PVE content is manageable (to say the least) and introducing a third party after my pet is unnecessary as far as I can see. Plus, due to their chaotic AI and poor handling, Landscape Soldiers are an extremely blunt tool. Considering how useful (and fun) companions are in Star WarsThe Old Republic as well as your away team in Star Trek Online, it’s a shame that LOTRO got saddled with such a less versatile equivalent.

Food, potions and other consumables. For most PVE content in LOTRO, my current stats are sufficient to see me through. Occasionally an instance may require a boost of some kind. If that is the case, the consumables that come from Hobbit Presents will do the job. Older iterations of food, potions and such like become obsolete rather quickly due to the speed of levelling and it is easy to clutter your bag with items you don’t need. For me and the manner in which I play LOTRO at, these items are not required. Raids are a different matter but again, is that really an issue for the average LOTRO player?

View fullsize

Crafting. Most of the people that I know who craft regularly in LOTRO, do so for pleasure. They enjoy the process as a relaxing experience. Crafting used to be quite a lucrative activity as well. Sadly, the crafting system in the game today is bloated, so those who have kept up to date and reached the required level of competence can just about stay on top of it and create gear for themselves. You simply don’t see much low level crafted gear on the auction house anymore. I will craft during the early levels of the game as it can provide a good additional source of XP. But sooner or later, it becomes too much of an unwieldy mechanic to maintain. Again, for a player such as I, avoiding crafting at the endgame is not in any way an impediment. Good gear is available elsewhere in her game.

Now I fully expect many people reading this to disagree and extol a contrary opinion. That’s fine with me if that is the case. In some respects it means that you’re getting more value out of this ageing MMORPG than I am. However, I’m sure I am not unique in my outlook. Perhaps the longevity of LOTRO is indeed part of the problem, along with a development team that always has more work than staff. Hence, older reputation faction currencies are left to languish in player’s barter wallets, effectively worthless beyond their designated level. The enjoyment of fishing becomes somewhat strained by level cap and the other hobbies touted to be added to the game remain conspicuously absent. I live in hope that Standing Stone Games will address these issues but I suspect that as time goes by yet more items will be added to the list of “things I do not use anymore”.

LOTRO: EG7 Community Update

View fullsize

Last December EG7 announced that it had purchased Daybreak Game Company and its portfolio. It subsequently became apparent that DGC was not just the publisher for Standing Stone Games but in fact their owner. Something that many players had suspected for a while. After an investor briefing was published, it became clear that EG7 were not just another corporate body out to asset strip and make a fast buck but were in fact genuinely interested in growing and improving the games that they now owned. For players of the MMORPG The Lord of the Rings Online, a wave of cautious optimism spread throughout the community. Hints at a graphical overhaul for the game and a potential console conversion were well received. Further news and specific details have been eagerly anticipated.

Yesterday, EG7 published a press release as well as a YouTube video, in which CEO Robin Flodin discusses what the company has been doing for the last 4 month in relation to its current portfolio of games. The written statement is somewhat broad in its scope and conciliatory in its tone. Robin Flodin uses a lot of management speak. That is not necessarily a bad thing. We all use the terminology of the industry that we work in. However, it is far from vague and does indicate how EG7 see their role and what their future remit is. “Many of these games, while successful and continually supported, have had their unique challenges. Many of these challenges are long standing and important, but due to their scope or other situations, haven’t been feasible to address. All of us want this to change”. He then further states “I want to assure you that this effort is a priority for me, EG7, and Daybreak. We have been listening to the community feedback and to all of your questions and concerns. This is an ongoing effort and as we make progress, the goal is to develop specific plans to create an even better game experience for all of our players”.

View fullsize

The video is a little more specific and proves illuminating as to the company’s policy and approach. Here Robin Flodin makes some direct comments about the company's intent. “We’re trying to make these companies better. We’re trying to help them improve in areas where we think we can create value”. He admits where they feel DGC has gone wrong which is a candid and unexpected statement of fact. He references mistakes made with the handling of H1Z1 and Planetside 2 and it would appear that the code for H1Z1 is currently being audited to see what can be done with it. Possibilities range from revamping the game and rolling it back to the iteration players liked best or to repurpose the code into another title. This is an interesting development because it shows that EG7 are not just going to arbitrarily dismiss and close games that they own. It would appear that they have a far more long term business mindset than DGC.

So what does this mean for LOTRO? Well both these statements, although not specific to the game, do inspire a degree of hope. It seems to me that EG7 see themselves as troubleshooters and facilitators who wish to invest, encourage and empower the various companies that develop their portfolio of games. The idea seems to be to foster improvement and growth, based on consumer feedback. If we are to take such policies at face value, the I think the most practical thing to do is to give EG7 a year and see if there are any noticeable changes. With regard to LOTRO let us see if they can encourage Standing Stone Games to be more innovative. I don't expect to see any major change in content design immediately but it is not unreasonable to expect a wider discussion about future development and an improvement in community relations from SSG. 

View fullsize

EG7 doesn't strike me as corporate pirates. They seem to want to improve the titles they own and keep both customers and their investors happy. However, their position is very much one of enabling and supporting the existing developers. This approach is fine if the only previous problems a developer has experienced were a lack of funding and confidence from their owners. What concerns me with regard to encouraging and enabling SSG, is that they don’t strike me as being the most imaginative thinkers at senior level and appear to be somewhat entrenched in their views. Therefore there is still potential that they may steer LOTRO off a cliff if left unchecked. Perhaps what SSG requires is an injection of fresh talent and for LOTRO to be put in the hands of those who have a more aspirational view of its future potential. As ever, only time will tell but it is pleasant to have some hope in the interim.

A Month in Gaming

View fullsize

I usually write this recurring post at the beginning of each month, reflecting upon my gaming activities over the previous thirty odd days. I refrained from writing an instalment at the beginning of April as I really didn’t feel I had much to say. However, now that a further month has elapsed, I believe sufficient has happened for me to continue. I do worry that these posts get repetitive and simply writing “ I played MMO A or B” is not sufficiently engaging. Luckily, I do feel that I have more to say this time round as I’ve broadened my gaming horizons recently and feel that I’ve done more, compared to other months. So let me begin with my return to console gaming. Something I haven’t done since 1999 when I purchased a Sega Dreamcast. After some procrastination, I’ve finally bought a Nintendo Switch and it has proven quite a hit not only with me but my grandchildren.

At present, I have three games for the Switch. Mario Kart 8 Deluxe, Yono And The Celestial Elephants and Assassin's Creed: The Rebel Collection. Essentially, any Mario based game is a joy to play and Mario Kart is an exemplar for the Nintendo brand’s virtues. It offers both fun and a challenge but it’s warm friendly graphics and inherent charm mollify the competitive elements that come with such a driving game. Yono is a A Legend of Zelda-esque adventure/puzzle game starring an elephant. Despite its child friendly aesthetic and design, there is a degree of depth to the gameplay. Due to it’s linear world design and narrative, it lends itself to short bursts of gameplay. Assassin’s Creed offers a different type of challenge, mainly because it requires mastering an action RPG using a controller, rather than keyboard and mouse. This is a very good port and I must admit I am impressed that the Switch can handle an open world environment so well.

View fullsize

I returned briefly to Call of Duty: Warzone recently, mainly to see the new map of Verdansk. When the game launched in early 2020 the story associated with Warzone was linked to events tied to the 2019 soft reboot of Modern Warfare. But because CoD is a yearly franchise, a new iteration was released in September and story elements began being integrated into Warzone. The only problem being that Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War is set in 1984 thus requiring the most tortuous and convoluted plot devices to square the ongoing narrative circle. From my perspective, bringing weapons from an older period into a game set in the present was problematic to say the least, causing balance issues. Furthermore the inclusion of Black Ops content brought zombies into the game. Hence Warzone is now a sprawling mess of differing types of gameplay. A recent nuclear blast has “conveniently” destroyed the contemporary iteration of Verdansk and replaced it with a version of the zone from 1984. Simply put I just don’t like the cumulative changes that have come to the game, so once again I’m taking a break from it.

Sadly, I have spent precious little time playing The Lord of the Rings Online, returning briefly to check out the latest content update which proved to be very disappointing. I do worry that this game is just treading water with regard to its growth and that developer’s Standing Stone Games are limited in the scope of their vision. The anniversary festival is currently live in the game but it really isn’t doing anything new. Yes, the various events can be fun if you are playing them for the first time but the various trinkets and baubles that you can obtain are purely cosmetic. If you are not enamoured with collectibles there is a substantial amount of content currently available that is of no interest or use to you. Furthermore, at present I own all the content available in LOTRO. Hence if there’s very little reason for me to subscribe to the game. I find it odd that SSG don’t seem to be offering any broader incentives to become a VIP.

View fullsize

Star Trek Online, which has some similarities to LOTRO with regard to its age and the fact that it’s based on a popular intellectual property, seems to perpetually have events and goals for players to pursue. I created a new Klingon alt in late January due to the then recruitment event. By the end of March I had brought the character to level cap and had gotten as far as level 5 with all reputation factions. I also bought a Legendary D7 ship and have spent time trying to equip it with the best gear that I can. One of the best aspects of STO is that there’s always something to do. Since January the game has had the Klingon Recruitment event with the storyline revamped, it’s celebrated First Contact Day and there have been two Red Alert events which are great for earning reputation marks. The game is currently running a revised version of the Delta Recruitment event, so if you’re thinking of playing STO, I’d urge you to roll a new character before May 13th. I now have three new alts making a total of nine altogether. Most unusual for me.

There are a few other games I’ve been intermittently playing over the last two months. Fall Guys: Ultimate Knockout is something I regularly return to and is fun in small doses. As I’ve mentioned before, I keep The Elder Scrolls Online up to date as I will more than likely return to the game once the next expansion launches. As for immediate gaming goals I have none of any significance at present. Naturally I’ll continue with STO and keep a weather eye on LOTRO. I want to come to grips with Assassin's Creed: The Rebel Collection and finally complete a game from this franchise (I’ve started Black Flag). The convenience of the Switch is a big selling point and I seem to evenly spend my time (at least for the meantime) using it as a handheld device as well as docked to the TV. It certainly has reinvigorated my attitude towards gaming which had become increasingly indifferent of late. I hope that this positive outlook continues over May and beyond.

LOTRO: The Further Adventures of Bilbo Baggins

View fullsize

I was hoping that 2021 would be a good year for the MMORPG, The Lord of the Rings Online. New owners, along with hints at a revised community relations policy and a recent roadmap for future content have all been positively received by the game’s stoic community. Furthermore, the recent demise of the LOTR based MMO by Amazon Game Studios has eliminated any immediate competition. Sadly, two things have occurred recently indicating that developer’s Standing Stone Games are still tone deaf to the player feedback and lacking in any tangible long term vision for the game. The first was a statement made by Executive Producer, Rob “Severlin” Ciccolini, regarding Legendary Items in the game and the subject of grind. The second was the new “Further Adventures” quest arcs, as described in February’s Executive Producer’s Letter, which uses the “missions” system that was added to the game in Update 28.

According to Mr. Ciccolini you cannot remove Legendary Items from LOTRO for the following reasons. “We want players to have things to do while they are leveling. I know that some players are ‘Oh, this is too grindy and sometimes we overdo it,’ but ‘grindy’ doesn’t scare me as much as ‘I don’t have enough to do.’ ‘I don’t have enough to do’ is worse because players want to play the game but they don’t really have goals to pursue. [If the LI system is removed], a couple things happen: One, players become much more reliant on weapon drops and if they don’t get the weapon drop they want, their DPS will lag […], and two, a weapon drop is one-and-done; we want to make sure that when [players] get a weapon they can then develop it”. (This quote was taken from Q&A with Severlin live stream on Friday April 16th)

View fullsize

There’s a lot to unpack in that statement and none of it is good. LOTRO players can be very innovative with regards to finding things to do in the game. Levelling alts, crafting, role playing, completing deeds, trading on the auction house, furnishing their homes, min-maxing, exploring the world, enjoying the festivals and hanging out with friends are but a few I can think of. So claiming that without grind there would be no “goals to pursue” is spurious to say the least or alternatively a statement of unparalleled ignorance of one’s own game. However, even if we accept this statement, offering grind instead or real content is hardly laudable. Plus as fellow blogger Wilhelm Arcturus said in comments left on the YouTube Q&A video, if SSG pursue a course of action justified by this erroneous supposition, it simply proves that they’re “committed to bad game design”.

Frankly, I often get the impression that SSG simply does not understand what attracts people to the MMO genre per se. They seem to see their own games as far more of a live service rather than an example of a massively multiplayer online game, in the classic sense. I also feel that the major decision makers over at SSG are somewhat behind the curve with regards to modern developments and changes in the MMO genre and are possibly very entrenched in their ways. Their attitude toward community relations certainly seems archaic. It may also be a case that the ebb and flow of staff over the years has left them with serious skills gaps. All the new content that is added to the game has a tendency to be very formulaic and simply variations on existing themes. I don’t think that the staff actually know how to create certain content anymore and integrate it into the game. 

View fullsize

Which sadly leads me to “The Further Adventures of Bilbo Baggins”. This is the first of a series of self-contained, episodic story arcs that use the “missions” system. Launched yesterday and currently available free using the redeem code SAVEBILBO, this new content is simply underwhelming and lacklustre. It is entirely built upon existing game assets and offers nothing new other than the very simple narrative. Each instalment requires the player to port to an instanced section of the existing game world and kill a few waves of standard mobs. It is not especially difficult or fun to be honest. It’s all somewhat disappointing and mundane. I find it most concerning that SSG intends to charge for this content after the promotional period ends and have more material of this kind in development. Overall this is a very inauspicious content update and does not bode well for the remainder of the year. Let us hope that the imminent 14th anniversary celebrations are more creative.

LOTRO: A Golden Opportunity

View fullsize

Back in Summer 2019, Amazon Game Studios announced it was co-developing a new free-to-play MMO set in Middle-earth, along with Athlon Games. The latter was at the time a subsidiary of Chinese publisher Leyou Technologies. However, in December 2020, Tencent bought Leyou Technologies which led to a series of contract renegotiations and reviews of ongoing projects. According to Bloomberg these negotiations did not go well and as a result, the new MMO has been cancelled. A spokesperson for Amazon recently stated that “we have been unable to secure terms to proceed with this title at this time. We love the Lord of the Rings IP, and are disappointed that we won't be bringing this game to customers”. Hence, Amazon will not have a complimentary game for their upcoming $1bn Lord of the Rings television series. At this point, possibly the only people who are happy with this outcome are Standing Stone Games, the developers of The Lord of the Rings Online.

LOTRO still exists today, 14 years after its launch, for several reasons but a major factor is that it is the only Tolkien based MMO in existence at present. Players endure the game’s numerous rough edges and age because of their dedication as fans and the simple fact that there's nowhere else to go. I, as well as many other LOTRO players, were curious to see what sort of game Amazon Game Studios could produce. If it had provided certain key elements of game play, along with a good artistic interpretation of Middle-earth, then I would have definitely considered playing it. But that is no longer an option. LOTRO remains the only MMO of its kind for the present and as a result I’m sure the current player base will remain loyal. However, I don’t think that SSG should be too complacent. The current situation is a bit like living in a small town which only has one mall to hang out at and one night club to go to. No matter how poor or inadequate they are, they'll get a degree of patronage purely by default. Hardly an edifying business model.

View fullsize

If you’re familiar with my gaming history, you’ll know I enjoy LOTRO but I clearly recognise it is far from perfect. It's age is one reason as the game was conceived and designed to serve the needs of the MMO genre of 2007. Over the years it has been revised and augmented. It has reached a point in its life cycle where it has an established player base and sufficient revenue to continue producing content. However, possibly due to staff changes and a reticence to tinker with fundamental aspects of the game, we have reached a point where nothing radically new is being added to LOTRO. To invoke a food based analogy, if the MMO genre is comparable to the fast food industry, then LOTRO is a sandwich shop. Its sandwiches are different to its competitors but beyond that, all it can offer its customers are different fillings. If you want a tea cake, forget it.

View fullsize

With the immediate competition out of the picture for the present and new owners EG7 genuinely interested in developing and supporting LOTRO, SSG appear to have a golden opportunity to refine and improve LOTRO. By developing some of the features that have been put on hold over the years and removing those that have proven unpopular, arcane and unwieldy, much could be done to increase the game’s longevity. Furthermore, a renaissance in their communication strategy could be instrumental in rebuilding community bridges and getting the player base onboard with a long term plan. Yet my past experiences with LOTRO leads me to believe that such an opportunity is likely to be squandered. I have seen no evidence thus far that SSG have a plan and even if they do, their continuing Johnny Tightlips routine is counterproductive. If Amazon’s new MMO hadn’t been cancelled, I wonder if things would be any different?

Star Trek Online: Delta Recruitment Event

View fullsize

Consider any MMORPG that has been around for a few years or more and you'll often find a game that is weighted towards the endgame and the players at level cap. New content often overlooks or even excludes players just starting out or those at intermediate levels. Furthermore, players that have drifted away from a game are often faced with the dilemma of returning to a character that they have forgotten how to play. The most practical solution to this is to simply create a new alt and start from scratch. However for a lot of players this is not a particularly inviting option. Repeating old content can be dull and singularly unrewarding. And for the new player, starting out and trying to catch up with the rest of the community or their friends who are at level cap, can frequently feel like an uphill struggle. It can be very frustrating when friends, colleagues and guild mates are playing the latest missions and you’re still mixing it down in the starter zones. 

Cryptic have come up with an interesting solution to this conundrum with their Delta Recruitment event for Star Trek Online. This is the third time they have run this incentive scheme. The Delta Recruitment event is a promotion by which players creating new 2409 Starfleet, Klingon Defense Force or Romulan Republic characters and replaying through existing content are offered a variety of rewards and bonuses. These include enhanced XP, a bespoke Delta Recruit Trait and the ability to earn additional Dilithium Ore with each NPC defeated. There are also account wide benefits to be had. Each time a Delta Recruit completes a particular task an Account-Wide Reward is unlocked, which is claimable once by every other character on that account. There are many other positive benefits associated with the event, which can be found on the Arc Games website. The Delta Recruitment event runs from April 15th on PC and May 13th. Any character created during the Event will remain a Delta Recruit indefinitely, allowing players to progress through objectives at their own pace.

View fullsize

Star Trek Online has come a long way over the past eleven years and the game has been continuously streamlined and refined. The story missions are very well conceived and certainly capture the essence of all the various Trek shows. It is also one of the few MMORPG with an equitable business model. Hence,The Delta Recruitment presents a perfect opportunity to start playing Star Trek Online or to return to the game if you’ve played in the past. This isn't just a case of offering a few superfluous baubles and trinkets. It is a comprehensive scheme to engage with players and offer them an enhanced experience as they journey to level cap. Furthermore, the influx of new players makes playing socially and grouping very accessible. There are plenty of friendly Fleets (guilds) that are happy to welcome new players. Alternatively, you may wish to create one of your own and establish a starbase and other resources with your friends. 

View fullsize

The Star Trek franchise is booming at present, with further seasons of Picard and Discovery on the way and Strange New Worlds currently in development. I have always had a soft spot for Star Trek Online, not only because of my love of the IP but because of the way it continuously reinvents itself and refines its game systems. Cryptic make blunders from time to time as many games developers do but they seem to have a genuine philosophy of self improvement. Plus so many MMORPGs are set in a generic sword and sorcery environment. Star Trek Online is founded upon an IP that has a track record of providing good quality, intelligent and challenging narratives. Not many games have such a distinguished pedigree. Therefore if you are considering returning to STO or playing for the first time, now is a great time to do so. The Delta Recruitment event runs from April 15th until May 13th.

Same Meat, Different Gravy

View fullsize

This is in fact Yorkshire Pudding with gravy, rather than meat but the analogy still stands…

Seeing Raph Koster back in the gaming news headlines has proven a timely reminder that no matter how things change, they remain the same. The video games industry has moved on in many ways with regard to technology and now enjoys mainstream appeal. However there are also areas where virtually no progress has been made. Hence Mr Koster’s protestations that the MMO genre has not yet reached its full potential. I started blogging about MMOs and other games around 15 years ago. I have an archive of my previous posts and spent some time recently looking at material I wrote back in 2007 and 2008. The subjects ranged from bad game launches, broken mechanics, staff redundancies, questionable business models, poor community relations and that perennial favourite, toxic communities. Many of which were written from the perspective of someone who was very invested in the genre and who had a degree of optimism for the future. Silly me to quote Paul Chuckle.

If you peruse any of the major video game news websites today, you’ll find that there’s still plenty of issues with bad game launches, broken mechanics, staff redundancies, questionable business models, poor community relations and asshole gamers. In fact the growth of social media has in some ways magnified these problems, bringing them to a wider audience’s attention, therefore intensifying any argument that may stem from them. The bottom line is its 2021 and nothing much appears to have changed. Magic Legends has had a broken soft launch. Outriders has had server issues. Dare I mention Cyberpunk 2077? Warzone continuously has to patch content that the previous patch has broken. Activision-Blizzard just made 190 staff redundant while their CEO got a $200 million bonus. Standing Stone Games have to be put in a virtual half nelson to talk to their customers. And just like a rat, you’re never more than six feet away from a douchebag gamer.

View fullsize

“Boo”…

So why haven’t some things changed? Why are the usual suspects still pulling the same old shit? Why haven’t we reached the gaming “promised land”? Well there are numerous contributory factors that have led to the current outcome but perhaps the two biggest of these are the way capitalism functions and how consumers respond to this. Contrary to what some may believe, capitalism isn’t about giving consumers what they want but maintaining a financial status quo. The video game industry’s raison d'être is to make money for the shareholders and executive staff. The creation of a video game that is fit for purpose is a secondary consideration. And a large percentage of consumers continuously enable the worst practises of the big publishers. Buying into damaging business practises such as pre-order culture, early access, soft launches, road maps and live services. Like Joseph de Maistre’s quote about getting the government we deserve, the same can be said about triple A games.

View fullsize

“Yay” etc.

Logically, it is not all doom and gloom. There are smaller game developers who have business relationships with less predatory publishers and between them good quality games are produced and sold. But not everyone has exposure to such products and companies. All too often it’s the wealthiest companies that have the biggest reach and thus dominate the market, despite selling flawed, broken and incomplete products. I may no longer be buying such games but I’m just one person. Sales data in the public domain shows that lots of other people are. Therefore, despite a growing degree of consumer pushback, I don’t think a critical mass is anywhere near being yet reached, which is why I don’t expect an industry wide sea change anytime soon. Hence I wouldn’t be at all surprised to find Mr. Koster is still evangelising the same ideas and concepts, a decade from now and that the MMO genre still hasn’t met its full potential. The only thing I am certain about is that Bobby Kotick will still be raking it in.

Do We Really Need "Living Worlds"?

View fullsize

There is a cogent argument to be had that the MMORPG genre has never really hit its full potential. Too many of them do the same thing and there is a long list of features that are conspicuously absent, that players habitually complain about. The debate is further “complicated” (like so many pop culture “debates” are) by one’s own relationship with the genre and what is best described as “personal baggage. Some players will eulogise about older games such as Ultima Online and EverQuest, extolling their lack of features and grindy nature as some sort of character building form of gaming self flagellation. Players with a more contemporary experience of MMOs are subsequently ambivalent towards social interaction and content gating. Hence if you ask a broad spectrum of MMO gamers what features they’d like to see in a new game, you’ll get a commensurate broad spectrum of answers. After 15 years of playing MMOs I’m not sure that I can adequately articulate my own thoughts on improving the genre. We all seem to want some sort of change but beyond that it all gets rather vague.

Furthermore, it’s not just a question of what players desire. Let us not forget that the video game industry has its pioneers, grandees and sacred cows who still have plenty to say on the state of the genre and the lofty heights it has still not reached. Such luminaries as Raph Koster and Richard Garriott. Although their contributions to the genre cannot be denied, are they really as relevant nowadays as they were a quarter of a century ago? (Wilhelm Arcturus explores this very subject in more depth in a recent post). Whenever I read an interview with such individuals, although they will broadly allude to notions of a future MMO being a truly “living world”, they are always somewhat light on detail. Plus it often comes across that there is an element of age based and institutionalized bias against current trends. I am reminded of old rock stars decrying the state of contemporary music or Martin Scorsese being nonplussed by the popularity of superhero films.

View fullsize

Therefore, as per usual with most matters of debate, it’s not all black and white. However, let us for the sake of argument focus on a common mantra (and one that Mr Koster still evangelises about), the notion of an MMO that is a “living world”. A virtual world in which player actions have a tangible impact. Communities would have to be built from scratch and maintained. Players would be free to pursue any career path they wished. The environment would be seasonal and subject to the caprices of nature. Its ecosystem would have to be managed. The game would develop an economy and a degree of self governance. A living microcosm of our own world that could be accessed from a desktop PC, a console or mobile device. It all sounds both exciting and alluring. Initially. And then when one takes the time to ponder how all of this would pan out, it quickly begins to fall apart. Because some people when free from the restraints of social convention and consequence go native. Hence an unfettered “living world” would possibly soon become a “living hell”.

The sad reality is that any proposed “living world” would have to be heavily regulated and moderated if it wanted to survive in any viable way. More rules would lead to more constraints and so the dream diminishes exponentially as the regulations grow. Furthermore, I’m not sure if providing a complex, virtual alternative to reality is actually a healthy thing for society to begin with. If real life is too bleak, crushing and depressing to cope with, that vast swathes of the population seek to escape from it, then it is indicative that our system of government has failed outright. It may be somewhat melodramatic but a faux world that presents itself as an escape could well end up being a gilded cage. And if we step back for a moment from the theoretical, the Holy Grail of a “living world” is predicated on the fact that people reject what is currently on offer from the MMO genre. Oddly, enough the numbers and revenue generated from existing games seem to fly in the face of such a supposition. Therefore, perhaps the best place to start with improving the MMO genre is to add some desirable yet practical new functionality, rather than jumping off at the deep end and trying to create a virtual Shangri-la. And even if such an environment could be created, do any of us have the time to invest in such a world? I think not.

Choosing a New Game

View fullsize

I want to talk about how we choose a new game from the countless titles that are currently available. I am going to be candid about how I do this as well as my own personal biases and prejudices. Because I am not open to playing any type of game. Like so many other aspects of life, I have very clear likes and dislikes that can only be tempered so far with logic and rational thinking. Video games as far as I’m concerned are supposed to be engaging, entertaining and inherently enjoyable. I don’t mind a degree of challenge and I’ll grind to achieve a specific goal, if I feel the reward to effort ratio is acceptable. I will on occasions attempt to step tentatively out of my comfort zone. However, there are some things that I simply don’t like, so they will not be considered. I think the best analogy for this is food. There are certain meals that I have tried (sometimes several times) and disliked, so they won’t ever be eaten again. Then there are other meals that contain ingredients I dislike or that are cooked in a style that I don’t enjoy. These are also off the proverbial table (no pun intended). 

So what games do I like? Well both the NES and SNES have had an impact upon my tastes. I consider the Mario Kart franchise to be nearly perfect. It is accessible and yet challenging. It also makes competitive gaming far more palatable as it is not bombastic or bellicose in either defeat or victory. I also enjoy a well balanced FPS and will certainly recommend CoD Warzone as the epitome of encapsulating that genre well. But my heart belongs to narrative driven RPGs and MMORPGs. I like involving and challenging stories, set in detailed worlds. I also like to have access to games based around major franchises that I revere, which is why I enjoy Star Trek Online and the Lord of the Rings Online so much. I’ve also dabbled with the strategy genre on occasions, along with deck-building games and point and click adventures. I even have a few simulator games in my extensive game selection. However, it should be noted that possibly 80% of said collection remains unplayed.

View fullsize

I can be just as specific about the game genres that I don’t like as I am about the ones I do. I am not a fan of PVP. Although I enjoy the FPS genre as this can be a far more balanced PVP environment. However, too often PVP is predatory and an uphill struggle for new players. I pay money to game developers to be entertained and not to be served up as canon fodder for established players. I don’t care for the mindset and elitist culture that also goes hand in hand with PVP and many other competitive games. Games that are couched in self aggrandisement and vanity are often breeding grounds for the most toxic aspects of gaming culture. I also eschew certain games on aesthetic grounds. The human experience is driven greatly by visual data and the way we interpret the world by how we see it. So to deny that we make decisions about games based upon how they look and the way they’re visually presented is crass. Hence I don’t like the isometric style. Nor do I like the anime visual aesthetic found in many games. I broadly prefer realistic graphics over cartoons, although stylisations can be very appropriate at times.

Therefore, when trawling through YouTube videos advertising forthcoming game releases, it is quite easy for me to quickly and efficiently assess what is and isn’t of interest to me. Plus its important to add that all the above rules are open to occasional contradictions. Hand of Fate and its sequel drew me into a genre that normally I wouldn’t have considered. More interestingly, sometimes there will be a new game that is broadly outside of what I like but it is getting a lot of traction among my peer group. So despite being a mature and grounded 53 year old, I am not immune to FOMO and a lot of other curious psychological phenomena. Naturally, there is an allure to joining your friends and being part of the current “in thing”. I recently succumbed to this and bought Cyberpunk 2077 and the reality of the game quickly shattered the hype and mystique that had prevailed up until launch. I have also written before about how odd it is to have missed the entire World of Warcraft “boat” over the years.

View fullsize

Earlier on I used a food based analogy to describe my likes and dislikes and equate this to video games. Once I have established that I don’t like something it is added to a prescribed list. However, most analogies don’t hold up to close scrutiny and although the part about my process for establishing a preference is accurate, I am far more willing to try new foods than I am video games. Upon mature reflection we all have our own bespoke assessment of what we want and don’t want from a video game because we all have a subjective definition of what actually equates to a game per se. I broadly agree with the notion that it is good to challenge yourself and step outside of one’s personal comfort zone. But you don’t have to do this habitually or else you’ll end up playing more games you dislike than like. I think it’s important to be self aware of one’s tastes and to be realistic about them. Yet the vast amount of free of heavily discounted games available do allow for greater experimentation. As ever there is a middle ground for each of us to find that offers us the best path forward.

Need or Greed?

View fullsize

In the dim and distant past when the world was young and the MMORPG genre still focused on the social element of multiplayer online gaming, there was a curious social etiquette associated with the acquisition of loot, enforced by the “need or greed” rule. This rule works as follows. When an item of loot drops after an enemy mob is killed, all members of the group that killed it have the option to claim the item. Upon doing so, they are presented with a choice of “need or greed”. If one or more persons in a group selects "need", they roll a virtual dice and the person with the highest roll gets the loot. If you choose "greed" when the majority of other players have chosen “need” you are effectively forfeiting any claim upon the loot item. If everyone selects "greed" then again, then there is a virtual dice roll and the player with the highest score receives the item. This system is intended to encourage players not to roll on items that they didn’t need (IE a ranged weapon for a melee character) and to foster an atmosphere of fair play and equanimity.

However, over the years, the social aspect of MMOs has diminished and the validity of the “need or greed” rule is now in question. Gaming has become a lot more transactional and simply put, many players will expect something shiny as a reward after completing group content. Quid pro quo and all that. Hence it is nowadays common practice to roll “need” by default in all looting situations. If an item is not specifically relevant to you but can be sold to a vendor for in-game currency then that is a big incentive. Logically, any opportunity that increases your in-game wealth is desirable, especially in light of how hard it can be to obtain “gold” in some MMORPGs. Furthermore, with the proliferation of auto grouping in games, there is little or no personal connection to the other players. This results in a reduced sense of social obligation as you are not potentially denying a fellow guild mate but just competing against a random stranger.

View fullsize

Therefore, all things considered, isn’t it time that this particular game mechanic was sidelined and replaced with something more functional and socially appropriate?  Perhaps the simplest solution (at least with regard to low level loot drops) is to allow them to be claimed by all parties. In the same way that some game developers have now made “ore nodes” and other environmental resources “shared” and non-competitive. Perhaps it may even be time to reconsider the entire game mechanic of “trash loot” within the MMO genre. In the meantime, continuously having to roll on loot in group content is simply a tedious reality that has to be endured. Especially in games that don’t support addons that can discreetly automate the process. However, we live in hope that sooner or later, the MMORPG will finally join the rest of gaming in the 21st century and that “need or greed” will be consigned to the history books.

LOTRO: Day, Night and Weather Cycle

View fullsize

I don’t know about you guys but whenever I log into The Lord of the Rings Online, it’s usually night in the game. This is a curious anomaly that can be somewhat frustrating if it’s the test server and I want to take some screenshots of new content. I put this down to the fact that I usually log in to LOTRO in the evening, here in the UK and I am unfortunately in sync with the Laurelin server night time phase. Sadly, there are no third party addons that can track the in-game time and server reboots always reset the game’s internal clock. However, I do like the fact that the game has a clear day and night cycle, which adds greatly to the overall ambience of LOTRO. Both of these phases have subcategories, all of which persist for specific times. Here is the cycle as it stands at present in the game.

Day Time lasts 1 hour 42 minutes 20 seconds

Dawn = 9 minutes 32 seconds 

Morning = 28 minutes 42 seconds

Noon = 17 minutes 47 seconds

Afternoon = 27 minutes 58 seconds

Dusk = 18 minutes 21 seconds

Night Time lasts 1 hour 23 minutes 40 seconds

Gloaming = 9 minutes 30 seconds

Evening = 27 minutes 59 seconds

Midnight = 8 minutes 59 seconds

Late Watches = 19 minutes 1 second

Foredawn = 18 minutes 11 seconds

Apart from giving the virtual Middle-earth a greater sense of realism, could this game mechanic be used for quests? Well initially it was. In an earlier iteration of LOTRO (circa 2007 - 2008) there were several quests that were night time specific. The ghost in Bree was nocturnal and one story arc had you meeting a Brigand infiltrator, again only at night. However, despite this time mechanic adding ambience to the proceedings, it was a nuisance if you received such quests at the wrong time of day. You could find yourself having to wait 90 minutes which is not a lot of fun in an MMO. Unlike single player games that use this mechanic, you cannot advance time in a shared world. Hence these quests were altered to allow access all of the time. It is also why we don’t see NPC and vendors keeping working hours and returning to their homes at night. So sadly, the day and night cycle is purely cosmetic in LOTRO as it now stands.

View fullsize

There are also random weather changes in LOTRO although there is nothing that can be clearly defined as a cycle. Sometimes I’ll log into a zone and it will be raining or overcast but broadly speaking the weather in a place such as Bree is predominantly temperate. Some zones have differing weather for geographical reasons. Naturally, the Misty Mountains are snow covered and the snow fall becomes heavier the higher you climb along the cliff top paths. Other parts of Middle-earth have bespoke weather for thematic reasons. Angmar has a sickly green coloured, overcast sky, reflecting the evil that blights the region. Allegedly the darkened sky is to accommodate the passage of Orcs, who have an aversion to daylight.  Again, it would be nice in principle to have some weather themed or dependent quests but gating content behind a mechanic you may have to wait on,  is not going to be well received.

View fullsize

The MMORPG genre is filled with game systems and mechanics that have been tentatively introduced and then left unfinished by the developers. Often because of the complexity inherent in such systems or because the idea being “tested” was not liked by all players. Weather cycles and the passage of time are such examples. Both of these could play a more active role if the developers of games such as LOTRO felt so inclined. I would be happy to see the return of quests that were time dependent. It would be nice to have some aesthetic details that only happened at certain times or dates. Such as Elves camping out beneath the stars. Or NPCs that come and go in towns such as Bree. Perhaps even animals that graze in fields by day and are then rounded up and taken to barn at night. Such things would add a lot to a game. But at this point in LOTRO’s lifecycle it is unlikely that resources would be used to develop such content.

LOTRO: Executive Producer’s Letter February 2021

View fullsize

Rob Ciccolini, posted an Executive Producer’s Letter for the MMORPG The Lord of the Rings Online, yesterday. This road map for 2021 pretty much confirms much of the content he broadly referenced in his recent live stream Q&A session. The letter doesn’t contain any major surprises but it is useful to have a more comprehensive time table for what is coming to the game this year. As ever, he thanked players for their ongoing support for LOTRO and Standing Stone Games endeavours. It is too early to determine whether SSG has successfully improved their communications policy but the letter has been fairly well received on the official forums.

The most immediate content release coming to LOTRO is Update 29: Wildwood which was previewed on the Bullroarer test server last month. As this is an addition to an existing area in the game, this update will be free. This content update, coming this month, will be followed by the Spring Festival, which will feature new seasonal instances featuring Grimbeorn. I tried one of these, again on the test server, and it was suitably droll and whimsical. It involves escorting Grimbeorn’s “Big Bees” around the meadows of Lossarnach so they can pollinate the flowers, while you fend off hordes of Goats!

View fullsize

Next up on the road map, Standing Stone Games are planning to release the first of what they are calling “Further Adventures”. These are quest arcs that make use of the existing Mission system that will feature new stories involving major and minor characters in Middle-earth. The first of which involves Bilbo Baggins. If it is well received by LOTRO players SSG will produce more. They’re also keen for player feedback regarding other characters that could feature in such content.

Summer will see the release of Update 30: Update 30: The Blood of Azog. The next installment of the War of Three Peaks. According to SSG “Durin Stonehelmson prepares to lead the Gabil'akkâ beyond the frozen gates of Mount Gundabad. At the urging of Glóin, Prince Durin sends word to the Lonely Mountain to muster even more Dwarves to Elderslade before the reclamation begins. As you aid in this effort, you'll discover the tale of Hermáth Stormhammer, a hero of the Battle of Azanulbizar. You'll experience important moments in the history of Durin's Folk firsthand, such as the taking of the Oakenshield, the death of Azog, the ever-present danger of Durin's Bane, and more! Update 30 will feature a new Interlude, new Quests, new Missions, and a new Raid in a Quest Pack that is free to VIPs!”

View fullsize

The next major expansion will be launched in Autumn. Specific details are lacking at present but Update 31: Gundabad concludes the story of The Legacy of Durin and the Trials of the Dwarves. Whether the new Brawler class is included in this release remains to be seen The River Hobbit race is conspicuously absent and judging by previous comments made by Rob Ciccolini, will more than likely not be available until 2022. The tailend of this year will see the Legendary Servers, Ithil and Arnor, updated to feature the Mordor expansion. There is ongoing PVMP development, focusing on class balancing and SSG are also tinkering with the Legendary Item system, although it seems to be more of a case of streamlining, rather than a major overhaul.

I, like many other LOTRO players, welcome any news about the games development in its 14th year. An expansion and two content updates is not in any way unsubstantial. However, it has been a while since LOTRO has seen the addition of a wholly new system or game mechanic. Missions, which were added with Update 28, are essentially a variation on an existing theme. Namely solo instances. They do not supply a great deal of narrative content and they are not especially challenging in their present form. LOTRO is at present locked into a cycle of supplying “more of the same”. New content simply see’s new reputation factions, new gear, essences and collectibles added to the game. Familiarity and providing a “set menu” does have its appeal, especially within the MMO genre. A clearly defined progression path with known parameters offers stability to the playerbase.

View fullsize

However if LOTRO truly wants to stay relevant and continue offering players an engaging virtual Middle-earth experience, isn’t it time to focus resources on creating something completely new for the game? Sadly, I cannot see resources being used to develop such a thing. Converting existing content so it can be accessed by console players is a sound business decision opening up a substantial new market. The success of The Elder Scrolls Online and Star Trek Online on Xbox and Playstation prove this. So I assume that this sort of work will take priority over the creation of new mechanics, systems, classes and races. Perhaps there are long term plans for such future development and SSG are focusing on the most immediate needs of the game. I still have a degree of optimism that the acquisition by EG7 may drive some substantial changes. As ever, it’s a question of watching and waiting.

A Month in Gaming

View fullsize

Here we are again. Yet another month has gone by and I find myself writing another instalment of “a month in gaming”. And to be honest, I have very little to say in this particular roundup of my gaming activities. I played Star Trek Online throughout February and created a new Klingon character to take advantage of the ongoing Klingon recruitment event. I have managed to upgrade a Tier 5 D7 and kit it out in such a way that it is fairly robust. And I also created a new Jem’Hadar alt, as they start at level 60 and you are provided with a fully equipped vessel and crew. Nothing fancy but it allows you to get into the endgame content a lot quicker. I may write a more detailed blog post about this at some point. I also played a lot more Fall Guys: Ultimate Knockout as my granddaughters came to stay for a week. I have already expressed my thoughts about the mechanics of that game in a prior post.

I briefly dabbled some more with Spiritfarer and Toren. Both are enigmatic and charismatic games which deserve a far more in depth blog post. Sadly due to time restrictions I have not played enough of these two titles to write a proper analysis. What I will say is that they are both intriguing and I wish to return to them as soon as I can. So in default of writing further about what I have been playing, I thought it would be interesting to talk about what I have not played. Because throughout February several titles have appeared regularly in my social media timeline, indicating that many of my friends and peers are playing them. However, due to the genre and type of games they are, I am not. Sometimes, not being part of a shared gaming experience that everyone appears to be enjoying, grants a very interesting perspective. I’ve expressed similar thoughts before regarding World of Warcraft.

View fullsize

Valheim seems to be having a great deal of success at present. This game only appeared on my radar when many of my fellow bloggers started writing about their experiences. At first I thought it was an MMO but as soon as I realised it was a survival and crafting driven title, I quickly decided it was not for me. However, it was pleasant to see it inspiring so many blog posts. These were not only very enlightening but a timely reminder that my fellow bloggers have diverse tastes and we don’t all enjoy the same thing. The other game that has come up a lot is Outriders. The playable demo has attracted a lot of attention and many are surmising that with the demise of Anthem, this title may well find a gap in the market at exactly the right time. Again, this new game is not for me, as I don’t think it offers a shred of originality. I also think my six month stint playing Call of Duty Warzone has fully scratched my “pew pew” itch.

If I had a close group of friends that I regularly played co-op games with, then Outriders may well be a more exciting prospect. I would be far more forgiving of the generic nature and aesthetics of the title. But I haven’t really had access to that sort of online social gaming network for a decade or more and I suspect I don’t have the time to play that way anymore. Valheim has aspects that interest me but I just cannot muster any enthusiasm about resource management in games. I just don’t find that sort of thing exciting. As for tracking game related data via a spreadsheet, well that’s Kryptonite to me. However, I have happily embraced the concept that some games aren’t for everyone. You can’t like everything or play everything. It’s fine not to be part of the latest “thing”. In fact getting that particular monkey off your back is especially liberating.

View fullsize

So what have I got scheduled for March, gaming wise, I hear you say. Well the idea of buying a Nintendo Switch is back on the table. My granddaughters are going to be six in July and they like simple, brightly coloured and “fun” games. Well Nintendo has all that in spades so I may buy a Switch for reasons of suitability and inclusion. They like to watch me play The Elder Scrolls Online but I have reservations about its appropriateness after one of them asked about the “lady with the burnt face and big boobies”. A regime of Mario and Pokemon may be a better idea at present. I also remembered recently that I have the game of the year version of Horizon Zero Dawn. Perhaps I should make time for that in March as I haven’t played a RPG for a while. I suspect that Standing Stone Games will release the next update for The Lord of the Rings Online soon, so it will be nice to return to Middle-earth and touch base with my kin mates. Let’s see what happens in the next 31 days.

LOTRO: Producer Q&A 2021

View fullsize

Executive Producer Rob Ciccolini (AKA Severlin) made a surprise appearance on the latest The Lord of the Rings Online livestream this week and conducted an impromptu Q&A with those viewing. As ever it did not contain any major revelation regarding the long term plans for the game but it did include some interesting nuggets of information. The fact that he engaged with players is a talking point in itself. Communication has been a major complaint from LOTRO players for several years now. Perhaps the negative PR from last year regarding the server outages and the so called “mini expansion” have finally appeared on senior staff’s radar. The fact that LOTRO has a new owner may also have contributed to this “revised” approach to community relations. Here is a breakdown of what Rob Ciccolini had to say, courtesy of Massively Overpowered:

There are plans for LOTRO continuing for a decade and more: “We want it to go on forever.”

A spotted leak of a “landscape difficulty NPC” is part of a project to let players increase the challenge level while questing, but that’s still in the works for all servers.

The Wildwood content update is cool because it fills out content in the mid-levels but has missions for endgame players.

“The more we round out the map in development, the more it feels real.”

Again, Gundabad expansion is confirmed for later this year with a continuation of the main storyline.

The Guardian class update and tank class balance changes are “ongoing.” But a lot of the attention from the class team is focused on the Brawler right now.

No teasing on the Brawler just yet. It’ll probably be part of the pre-order for Gundabad. “Doing a new class is a big deal!”

The studio would love to do more racial housing, but nothing immediate. Definitely not before the expansion.

There will be Update 30 in the summer before Gundabad. It will be an endgame patch that includes a smaller raid. It’ll be handled as a normal quest pack.

There is no release date for Wildwood yet. It’ll be a regular quest pack that’ll be free for VIPs.

He feels communication is “improved,” which is why he’s doing these Q&As.

There will be more talk about “modest changes” for PvMP coming in the producer’s letter.

Producer’s letter is almost ready and will be here within the month.

LOTRO market gifting is coming in the near future, but there is no ETA for it yet.

Scrolls of Empowerment controversy: The team wants players to stay at their level of content rather than going back to farm easier spots.

Apologized for the delay on legendary item revamp, as it’s gotten delayed twice now for different reasons. They are excited to do it, want to do it, but it’s slow in coming because of how much engineering resources it’ll take.

Look for the legendary item revamp “later this year” that will include UI changes. The time frame for this depends on what engineering says when they get in there. They just want one system from level 50 onward that’ll make for leveling alts better.

Transferring from closed game worlds will be happening in “the near future.”

River-hobbits are confirmed to be an upcoming race, but don’t expect to see it until 2022.

They are aware of attack speed and animation issues, but they have to deal with this carefully and delicately since it affects so much.

There are possible plans to create a level 130 Valar boost, but this is not confirmed yet.

No further plans to expand LUA support.

The anniversary event is indeed coming.

The team wants to put more resources into crafting, possibly after Gundabad.

There is more work being done to reduce server lag, especially during raids. New chat server hardware is being worked on.

Kinship revamps are on the list, not at the highest priority but it’s there.

SSG has no plans for Europe-based servers as it doesn’t have the resources to support both.

The studio “learned a lot of lessons” from the War of the Three Peaks “mini-expansion” debacle such as giving VIP players more value from these (“We’re not trying to squeeze them,” he said of charging VIP players) and making the more expensive bundles better.

The team wants to give players more ways to get good gear, including essences.

No new instruments are being announced, but it’s definitely something the team loves to do.

The team has discussed a stat squish, but it’s a “big deal” that requires an entire game rebalance. It would also invalidate every single class guide if this happens. Not saying yes, not saying no.

SSG’s goal is to have something fun for players to do “every 13 weeks,” something cool and interesting as 13 weeks seems to be the point when players start to fall away without further stimulation. It’s why the team wants to get out the as-of-yet-unseen Unfinished Tales quests.

There’s a lot of discussion about investing into the engine and graphics of the game. This comes from EG7’s excitement about improving that.

There are more character customization options in the works, perhaps prior to the expansion.

SSG knows that 4K support is heavily requested, but it requires specialists to do it right. They’re looking into the viability of doing that.

SSG has a number of positions open as it is expanding the team.

Scaling UI is something the team wants to do.

The team looks at the player engagement data from patches to help figure out what should be developed in the future.

The legendary servers should be going to level 105 in the next few months.

GMs are getting more tools to help players better and more quickly.

SSG wants to revamp its website, it knows that it is old.

There are plans for more of these AMAs!

View fullsize

There are a few points that I would like to pick up on. Firstly Mr. Ciccolini’s claim that communication has improved strikes me as a little premature. I think we should give this a year to decide if things have gotten better. But at least he has shown up and engaged with the community so it’s a start. Secondly, I am cautiously optimistic about the proposed Legendary Item changes. If the developers can rationalize the mechanics and make the overall system less arcane, then they’ll impress the hell out of me. I still like the idea of a weapon that levels and grows with you as you progress through the game but I don’t want the process to be an insufferable grind. I also don’t want it to be a means to strong arm me into paying unnecessarily. It is unethical and frankly insulting to artificially create a grind and then monetise the very means to escape it. Thirdly, I am definitely interested in a level 130 Valar boost. I have several alts I want to progress but don’t wish to drag through Mordor.

However some of the other issues discussed are a little more nebulous and I suspect will be difficult to address without a lot of financial investment and the employment of specialist staff. Tinkering with graphics and upgrading the game engine are major undertakings. However, if LOTRO is to remain competitive with other MMOs, a more contemporary visual style along with support for 4K, as well as a scaling UI, would be beneficial. However, let us not forget that some people do not like change. Alterations to the Hobbit run animation along with the last character model upgrade resulted in a small but vocal group of players brandishing flaming torches and marching on the Winter Palace. If changes are made, will SSG be able to offer an option for a “classic” game aesthetic?

View fullsize

I am hoping that Standing Stone Games will be more transparent with regard to their actions in the months to come. I don’t expect to see the details of the corporate balance sheet but I would like to know what’s being planned and how things are going. If problems occur I’d like to be treated as an adult and told that there is an issue. It’s only a small percentage of players that tend to lose their shit when there are delays and frankly they’re best ignored. The rest of us tend to have a positive view of the game and want to get behind and support its ongoing development. Hence I hope we see more of Mr Ciccolini in 2021 and we get a clear road map for the next 12 month soon. Hopefully SSG will be a little more sensitive to player sensibilities and feedback. The whole Scrolls of Empowerment debacle is still present in many player’s minds. I still balk not only at the level locking of scrolls but the fact they put a cap on how many you can stockpile at once. SSG needs to get a lot of things right this year if they want to genuinely repair community relations. Let us hope that process has now officially started.

LOTRO: Bullroarer Update 29 Wildwood Preview #1

View fullsize

When I heard that Update 29 for The Lord of the Rings Online would be an area between Evendim and The North Downs, I assumed there would be a new zone somewhere above Fornost. Well it pays to remember never assume anything. I logged on to the Bullroarer test server tonight and found that Wildwood (as the new area is called) is actually located in North West Bree-Land. Standing Stone Games have developed what was previously an inaccessible part of the Bree-Land and created an interesting new region. It maintains the existing idiom of the overall zone with regard to aesthetics and mobs but from what I have seen the PVE content available is pitched at level 45 or thereabouts. It would appear that there is an NPC based at the Trestlebridge Gate who offers level cap Missions that take place in the new area.

Before I discuss this specific quest arrangement, I would like to talk briefly about Wildwood. If you ride North along the Greenway towards Trestbridge, there is a turning to the left of the road once you get just beyond the Orc camp where Rob Thornley is held hostage. This road bears West above the Cirith Nur Orc camp and then the terrain opens out into a wooded and grassland region that is Wildwood. Like most of Bree-Land, the area is blighted by Ruffians and Poachers. Due to its close proximity to Evendim, there are also Tomb Robbers along the banks of the Brandywine. You will find Orcs occupying the old Dunedain ruins of Norwarden and Overwine Hall. Wargs congregate around the aptly named Gnawbone Pit. There is also a village that has been overrun by bandits called Cotfast. There are two mines in the new area called West and East-delf, both of which are occupied by bandits. In the depths there is the cavernous area of Writhenset, complete with spiders and a maze of web tangled tunnels.

View fullsize

An old Watch Tower, Sutwarden that overlooks lake Starmere. The lake flows out into the Brandywine through the Brandy Hills. There is another Dunedain ruin called The Old Bluff-house. Again this is rife with Wildwood Assailants. Tucked away in the farthest top left hand corner of Wildwood is a rickety rope bridge, Marl’s Crossing, that straddles the river that separates this new zone from the North Downs. It is held by Half Orcs and at present cannot be crossed. Even if it could it would lead to a part of Evendim that is currently inaccessible anyway. In many ways this highlights the unusual nature of Wildwood. It is surrounded by older areas which are designed to be level 20 to 30. For example the Brandy Hill Ruins and the home of Svalfang The Stone Giant abut closely to the Wildwood. So players with low level alts will have to tread carefully when in the area, less they stray into mobs with a higher level.

The main quest hub for the new area appears to be Trader’s Wharf which is on the Eastern banks of the Brandywine river. A group of adventurers and traders are attempting to reclaim the Wildwood from the various bandits and poachers. There’s a reputation quartermaster and other traders, along with the obligatory weeping NPC, who in this case is a Hobbit. According to the notes on the official forum, it is here that the quest to explore the Wildwood can be started. The new zone can also be approached from Trestlebridge which now has a Western entrance and a road that runs out into the new area. It is at Trestlebridge Gate House that you can find the NPC that bestows content for players at level cap. It would appear that these are specifically Missions and therefore are designed for solo or duo players. I tried several of these and found them to be broadly similar to those found in War of Three Peaks.

View fullsize

Wildland is not a huge new area but I must admit, I like the fact that SSG have opted to develop an unused area of an existing and much beloved zone. Bree-Land is one of the oldest regions in LOTRO and it is nice to see a new area that maintains the existing idiom. There are a few oddities at present which may be placeholder content. It is somewhat incongruous to find a Moose in such an area. I am also intrigued by the Wandering Jorthkyn that I encountered. Naturally I will complete the PVE content when it is formally released, although being level 45 it will offer no tangible benefits apart from the story. And I must say I am far from thrilled that the only level cap content on offer are Missions, which I am not especially enamoured with. Overall the scope of this update, which is apparently going to be free, is somewhat reduced compared to previous releases. I suspect the pandemic is to blame for this. It will be interesting to see how the community receives Wildwood and whether Missions are popular or not.

NB. The Bree-Land Map been updated to reflect the new area of Wildwood. SSG have also revised the maps for The Shire and Ered Luin.

MMO Tropes: The Hero

View fullsize

If I may quote myself “The MMO genre is rife with its own set of tropes; recurring themes and motifs that have become established and ubiquitous. All of which are ideal material for a hastily produced, lazily conceived, recurring blog post”. This time round, I would like to discuss the following. The Hero, the Chosen One, the Übermensch. As that is the role that we so often are assigned in this genre. Developers broadly assume that most players want a power fantasy and precious little else is on offer. Hence we find ourselves in a  story in which we are destined to do great deeds in a virtual world, whether we wish to or not. I can see the superficial appeal of such a conceit. Most of us are not such overachievers in real life. So a game in which we get to do stuff to the world, instead of the world doing stuff to us has an inherent allure. But like most MMO tropes, unless it is implemented with some panache and creativity, it quickly becomes a tiresome cliche.

In The Lord of the Rings Online, upon creating a new character and entering Middle-earth, you soon find that even the most humble and parochial of Hobbits is destined for an epic adventure of the utmost importance. Due to the nature of the lore you cannot be an active member of The Fellowship of the Ring but your paths frequently cross. And you are revered as you progress through the game, as your fame and renown proceeds you. It’s hardly a low key affair. In Star Trek Online, your Federation character rapidly rises through the ranks of Starfleet, after you are forced to take charge in a crisis during your maiden voyage. The Klingon storyline takes an alternative approach with your avatar challenging the ship’s Captain to single combat after you discover their treachery. And in The Elder Scrolls Online, if you elect to follow the original primary storyline, you become the Vestige, empowered with unique abilities as a result of the temporary loss of your soul. Get you.

View fullsize

Although these examples all work within the internal logic of their respective games, they are all rather formulaic. After a while, if you’ve played several MMOs, then the archetype of the predestined hero becomes rather dull and at times actively annoying. But it is easy to understand why this narrative construct prevails in gaming. Because it is already the default setting of so much fantasy literature, film and television. Power fantasies per se are a mainstay of our popular culture, providing both the moral and ethical rectitude that is so sadly lacking in real life. In an MMO the bad guy will be dealt with and justice will be served, where in reality they tend to die in their own beds, rich and content while their victims scream into the abyss. Furthermore, power fantasies tend to be driven by robust archetypes who wield power justly. Hence it is John McClane the cop who defeats the terrorist by using force and cunning in Die Hard, rather than Colin McTavish, the junior photocopy clerk, who works in the administrative department of a small company making stilts for Dachshunds.

However, not every player wants to be a dashing hero or is comfortable with a never ending litany of quests and missions that are predicated upon mass murder and destruction. MMO players often revel in the low key fun of crafting, farming resources and trading on the auction house. In fact some will argue cogently that they desire a game where they can progress just by pursuing benign and benevolent activities such as being a jeweller or armorsmith. Every now and then, I am delighted when I read about a gamer who has managed to play through an MMOs by crafting or some other non-stabby and murderous means of progression. Sadly, this is not always possible or if it is, the player hobbles themself by missing out on vital drops or skills points that are gated behind story content. It’s a shame that game developers have not been more proactive in catering to players that desire a non heroic role. Some gamers are perfectly content with the prospect of just being an average citizen in a virtual world, as they are in real life.

View fullsize

I think one of the measures of a good MMO is how much choice it offers its players. The more the better. Given the complexity of branching narratives that contemporary games can support, it would be intriguing to see an MMO built upon such a system. I like the idea of being a foot soldier who can participate in battles but your personal actions directly affect career progression. If you just hold your position and fight the enemy then you’ve done your job. If you seek out additional tasks and risk, then you increase further in rank and responsibilities. This way you can seek to be a hero or choose to remain less assuming. And why not let players be a chef, a farmer or a quantity surveyor? There is scope for inventive gameplay within such disciplines. Instead of seeking the Sword of Kagnazax your goal could be the Mixing Bowl of Sha Ka Ree or the Trowl of House Harkonnen.

At present, the hero character is the default setting of the MMO genre and as such it must be endured by the player. And like most tropes common to the MMO genre, it is more of a means to an end, rather than something to be over analysed and dissected. Because if you do the latter, the logic of it all somewhat falls apart. It makes for an awkward situation when you swagger into a tavern, expecting to live large on your reputation as the bane of the foul Marmidons and vanquisher of the Nibble-Pibblies, only to find that everyone else present has done exactly the same. Too many cooks and all that. Plus who really wants to live in a virtual world, filled with nothing but heroes and over achievers? Nothing mundane or normal would ever get done. Who is going to deal with the blocked drains in the Lion’s Arch or treat Ultan Foebane’s haemorrhoids?

Star Trek Online: Budget D7

View fullsize

The current Klingon Recruitment Event in Star Trek Online is a great opportunity for new and returning players. The revamped Klingon storyline really hits the mark, offering an adventure that is packed to the gunwales with lore appropriate themes and homages. Basically you get to shout Qapla' a lot and while dispatching your enemies with the business end of your bat'leth. You even get to fight alongside Kahless the Unforgettable himself. Cryptic certainly know how to use their license effectively, offering not only a fanservice but a genuinely well conceived narrative. So let it suffice to say, I created a new Klingon alt (choosing a Discovery era Klingon this time round) and have powered through the four story arcs. K’Olin has now reached level 53 and the rank of Lieutenant General. I have benefited greatly by reclaiming gear and equipment that has been account unlocked by other alts.

So far I have played through the game using a Tier 6 Qib Intel Battlecruiser that is part of the Delta Rising: Operations Pack. It scales to level and has proven most useful. However, like many STO players, I hanker after the iconic D7. There are currently three Tier 6 variants of the D7 in the game but they are only available from Infinity Promotion Research & Development Packs, Duty Officer Packs and Infinity Lock Boxes. The odds of finding one when opening any of these are low. Alternatively you can buy one from another player via the in game exchange but the prices are impractical. Hence I am not likely to be getting a Tier 6 D7. However, there is a compromise available. It may not satisfy players who like to pursue maximum DPS but for the average STO player, this is a viable solution. Why not purchase the Fleet K't'inga Battlecruiser Retrofit, which is Tier 5 and then upgrade it?

View fullsize

To purchase the Fleet K't'inga Battlecruiser Retrofit, you will need 4 Fleet Modules (which cost 500 Zen each), 20,000 Fleet Credits and access to a Fleet. Your character has to be level 50 or above. Make sure you buy the Fleet version of the ship and not the regular version which is NOT upgradeable. Next you will need a Starship Upgrade Requisition (cost 700 Zen) which will make your ship Tier 5-U. This will increase the hull, add an extra console seat and access to Starship Mastery passive trait system. And then if you apply an Experimental Ship Upgrade Token (cost 1000 Zen) you will add a further ship device slot, universal console slot and the ability to use an extra starship trait. You will now have a D7 with 12 console slots and 4 device slots for the cost of 3,700 Zen. All this will cost about £32 but it’s ultimately a lot cheaper than buying dozens of lock box keys and hoping to luck.

View fullsize

As you’ve probably surmised, I chose this option. For those with much deeper pockets you can always search the internet for third party sellers and buy a Tier 6 D7 for cash. But it will set you back about $190 or so. Frankly, I think the upgraded Fleet K't'inga Battlecruiser Retrofit is the best option for players who want the iconic vessel but aren’t looking for the best stats. This hybrid solution offers a ship with an acceptable hull and if you equip the right consoles and weapons you won’t be underpowered. It will definitely have no difficulty dealing with PVE content. This version of the D7 unlocks 4 skin variants and offers a degree of customisation, so you should be able to get the look you are striving for. So if like me you really want to sport that classic Klingon look then consider this budget option. Don’t let any petaQ tell you otherwise.