The Conspiracy (2012)
Filmmakers Aaron (Aaron Poole) and Jim (James Gilbert) decide to make a documentary about online conspiracy theories Terrance G (Alan Peterson), mainly due to the amount of attention he attracts online. Terrance explains in detail how many global events all appear to be linked to an NGO called the Tarsus Club. Jim remains sceptical of such theories, but Aaron is more willing to accept them. During an interview, Terrance becomes agitated and points out a man whom he believes to be following him. A few days later Terrance vanishes. Aaron searches through various newspaper clippings left in Terrance’s apartment and finds a reference to a Time magazine article about the Tarsus Club written by Mark Tucker (Bruce Clayton). As the pair of journalists search for Tucker, they see the same man that was following Terrance. They are also menaced by a Black SUV that parks outside Jim’s house at night. Finally, Tucker contacts them online and it becomes clear that he has more to reveal about the Tarsus Club. Aaron suggests that they try to infiltrate the next meeting, but Jim is reluctant to do so, due to the possible danger.
Filmmakers Aaron (Aaron Poole) and Jim (James Gilbert) decide to make a documentary about online conspiracy theories Terrance G (Alan Peterson), mainly due to the amount of attention he attracts online. Terrance explains in detail how many global events all appear to be linked to an NGO called the Tarsus Club. Jim remains sceptical of such theories, but Aaron is more willing to accept them. During an interview, Terrance becomes agitated and points out a man whom he believes to be following him. A few days later Terrance vanishes. Aaron searches through various newspaper clippings left in Terrance’s apartment and finds a reference to a Time magazine article about the Tarsus Club written by Mark Tucker (Bruce Clayton). As the pair of journalists search for Tucker, they see the same man that was following Terrance. They are also menaced by a Black SUV that parks outside Jim’s house at night. Finally, Tucker contacts them online and it becomes clear that he has more to reveal about the Tarsus Club. Aaron suggests that they try to infiltrate the next meeting, but Jim is reluctant to do so, due to the possible danger.
The Conspiracy is very much a film of two halves. The first forty-five minutes sets up the story well as the two documentary filmmakers immerse themselves in the world of conspiracy theorists. We meet various personalities known within the conspiracy theory community, there are clips from their YouTube channels and we see online meetings via virtual chat rooms. Terrance G. is very plausible (and by far the most interesting character) who is cleverly offset and contrasted by occasional sound bites from an academic. His disappearance and the subsequent investigation by Aaron and Jim is suitably intriguing. Events begin to escalate as the journalists are followed by a black SUV and Aaron’s home is broken into. These events put a strain upon Jim and Aaron’s working relationship. When they meet Mark Tucker and he alludes to more powerful and sinister forces, the plot maintains a sense of credibility within its own internal logic. The Tarsus Club, initially represented as a political lobbying body and international business cartel, is not an inherently implausible plot device. So far, so good.
However, director and writer Christopher MacBride, takes the plot in a different direction during the second half of The Conspiracy. The faux documentary, through a plot conceit, switches to the use of hidden camera footage for most of the climax. Hence, we have a distinct change of tone as the film slips awkwardly into the found footage/horror genre as Aaron finds himself in jeopardy. Sadly, this transition doesn’t really work and negates the innovation of the first half. The main characters work adequately as documentary filmmakers because they are conduits for an exploration of conspiracy theories. Once they become protagonists in jeopardy, rather than just spectators, they’re too insubstantial to support such a plot twist. The ending, which implies a cover up, tries to reconcile the two different halves of this film but it struggles to do so in an acceptable fashion. It’s a shame because The Conspiracy begins with a lot of promise. Overall, it ends up being very average.
As Above, So Below (2014)
The found footage genre is predicated on the concept that the material the audience watches is supposed to be filmed from real life. This therefore presents a challenge for actors as their performances have to appear like everyday social interactions. Most people are not great orators with extensive vocabularies, in real life. Watch any wedding video or vox pop on a news broadcast and you’ll quickly become aware of the gulf between how people express themselves in reality and the stylised, contrived manner in which actors deliver dialogue. Hence, during the first act of As Above, So Below I became aware that the cast were “acting”. They were using dramatic techniques commonly used in conventional film but which stands out far more in this genre. This changed as the film progressed and the story became more deliberately chaotic. But it was noticeable during the initial set up to the story. It’s not something I’ve noticed before with other found footage movies. But in many ways, As Above, So Below is quite different compared to other genre examples
The found footage genre is predicated on the concept that the material the audience watches is supposed to be filmed from real life. This therefore presents a challenge for actors as their performances have to appear like everyday social interactions. Most people are not great orators with extensive vocabularies, in real life. Watch any wedding video or vox pop on a news broadcast and you’ll quickly become aware of the gulf between how people express themselves in reality and the stylised, contrived manner in which actors deliver dialogue. Hence, during the first act of As Above, So Below I became aware that the cast were “acting”. They were using dramatic techniques commonly used in conventional film but which stands out far more in this genre. This changed as the film progressed and the story became more deliberately chaotic. But it was noticeable during the initial set up to the story. It’s not something I’ve noticed before with other found footage movies. But in many ways, As Above, So Below is quite different compared to other genre examples
Archaeologist Scarlett Marlowe (Perdita Weeks) is obsessed with finding Nicholas Flamel's alchemical Philosopher's Stone. After finding an inscription in a cave in Iran, written in Aramaic, she travels to Paris along with her documentary cameraman Benji (Edwin Hodge). She meets with her former boyfriend George (Ben Feldman) who is an expert in ancient languages. After deciphering the inscription and using it to find hidden information on the back of Nicholas Flamel's gravestone, they discover that the Philosopher's Stone is located in the Parisian Catacombs. The team then finds a group of unofficial guides, Papillon, Siouxie and Zed, who are experienced exploring the parts of the Catacombs not open to the public. They enter the subterranean necropolis and when a tunnel collapses, are forced to take a route that has previously not been explored. Papillon is nervous as a close friend of his La Taupe vanished here, despite his knowledge. As the group travel further they become aware that all is not as it seems and that they’re all being haunted by their own past.
Once the cast are trapped in the Parisian Catacombs the plot draws heavily from Dante's Inferno. Given the scope of the story and the nature of themes therein, I would argue that maybe it would have been preferable to have made As Above, So Below a standard horror film, rather than in the found footage format. However, writers Paco Plaza, Luis A. Berdejo and Jaume Balagueró certainly are innovative with regards to pushing the boundaries of this genre. There are several noticeable scenes which have a palpable sense of claustrophobia that I’ve only seen previously in The Borderlands (2013) and The Descent (2005). The characters are at times somewhat annoying with their bickering and squabbling but that is a reflection of their personalities. There is a tipping point in the story where events veer from the strange into the pure eldritch. Stone faces appear in the walls and attack people, hooded figures charge at the unwary and the narrow corridors of the necropolis fill with blood. By this point the viewer either goes with the proceedings or emotionally checks out.
Most found footage films do not hold up to close scrutiny. The most common criticism is that there often comes a point in the story where most people would stop filming and run. And this argument can certainly be levelled at As Above, So Below. However, because the story is so ambitious with its use of nonlinear time, visions of hell and exploration of alchemy, it seems pedantic to focus on minor contradictions of the format and the film’s own internal logic. There’s also an off kilter ambience to the proceedings. Simple things like finding a piano amid the dust and confines of the tunnel are disquieting. Papillon coming across one of his own graffiti tags which he claims he hasn’t done is similarly bothersome. Plus the Parisian Catacombs themselves are just plain sinister. I suspect there may be no middle ground with As Above, So Below. You’ll either embrace its ambition and enjoy it or dismiss it out right. I chose the former.
The McPherson Tape (1989)
In many ways the story behind The McPherson Tape is a lot more interesting than the film itself. This early found footage movie from 1989, was shot on home video on a virtually non-existent budget. The director Dean Alioto eventually found a distributor but on the eve of the movie’s home video release, the warehouse burned down and allegedly destroyed the master tape and all the promotional artwork. Yet this was not the end of the story. It was common practice in the eighties for small distributors to send advance copies to local independent video stores. Hence The McPherson Tape found its way into the pirate video ecosystem. It then migrated to the UFO community where it was circulated as being a video of a legitimate alien abduction. Dean found himself in the unusual position of having to debunk his own work. Three decades later due to the intriguing tale associated with The McPherson Tape, it has been remastered from the newly rediscovered 3/4" tape and re-released.
In many ways the story behind The McPherson Tape is a lot more interesting than the film itself. This early found footage movie from 1989, was shot on home video on a virtually non-existent budget. The director Dean Alioto eventually found a distributor but on the eve of the movie’s home video release, the warehouse burned down and allegedly destroyed the master tape and all the promotional artwork. Yet this was not the end of the story. It was common practice in the eighties for small distributors to send advance copies to local independent video stores. Hence The McPherson Tape found its way into the pirate video ecosystem. It then migrated to the UFO community where it was circulated as being a video of a legitimate alien abduction. Dean found himself in the unusual position of having to debunk his own work. Three decades later due to the intriguing tale associated with The McPherson Tape, it has been remastered from the newly rediscovered 3/4" tape and re-released.
On the evening of October 8, 1983, the Van Heese family gather in the Connecticut mountains to celebrate the birthday of 5-year-old Michelle. The family consists of Ma Van Heese (Shirly McCalla), her three sons Eric (Tommy Giavocchini), Jason (Patrick Kelley), and Michael (Dean Alioto), Eric’s wife Jamie (Christine Staples), his daughter Michelle (Laura Tomas) and Jason’s girlfriend Renee (Stacey Shulman). Michael uses his hand-held camera to record the night’s events, much to the amusement and irritation of his family. They chat and argue as families do as the evening progresses. However when a circuit breaker trips the brothers go outside to restore power. An unusual red light overhead arouses their curiosity so they walk to a neighbouring property, only to find a spacecraft has landed. They flee back to their own house when they are noticed by the extraterrestrial occupants. Armed with shotguns they nervously await pursuit. When something tries to enter via a window, Eric shoots it and brings the body into the house as “evidence”. Is this the end of the siege or do further perils await them?
There is the germ of a good idea in The McPherson Tape and first time writer and director Dean Alioto should be applauded for trying to do something so unusual and ambitious like this back in 1989, when this genre was still in its infancy. But the film struggles to sustain its relatively short hour running time. Despite all the logical concessions that you can make to both the production and cast, this is a ponderous undertaking and a tough watch. It genuinely does at times come across as exactly watching someone’s home videos. Despite restoration, the picture quality is poor however that does work in the films favour to a degree. The characters act in a relatively plausible fashion, arguing among themselves and generally acting impulsively and without any critical thinking. But events take too long to go anywhere and by the time we reach a point where things start to get “interesting” the film ends because it has achieved its purpose.
Hence, I cannot recommend The McPherson Tape to the casual viewer, as it doesn’t really meet mainstream entertainment standards. This is most definitely a niche market product that will best suit the genre completist and aficionado. The editing is minimal and cleverly disguised making The McPherson Tape look very much like a continuous piece of footage. The camera at times is out of focus or points at a plate or the floor. Keeping things simple in scope certainly helps the proceedings and therefore we only see a small amount of the UFO and the aliens themselves. The commentary track on the new Blu-ray release is by far the biggest selling point and it is fascinating to learn how a small budget film ended up fuelling alien abduction conspiracy theories. The director later went on to remake the film with a larger budget and studio backing in 1998, under the title Alien Abduction: Incident in Lake County.
Host (2020)
In his review in the New York Times Kyle Turner states that the new horror movie Host “seems to speak to a collective id” and serves as “an analogy for mourning the recent past”. I’ve read several other critiques of this nature that both praise the film and make similar philosophical musings upon its nature. As a long standing horror aficionado I am always a little sceptical when a new movie quickly gains a lot of traction and a critical consensus swiftly forms. Especially when a genre product suddenly gains the attention of the mainstream media who subsequently stray into hyperbole and hype. This happened last year with Midsommar which was hailed as a groundbreaking horror movie and indicative of a renaissance in the genre. Although an intelligent and disturbing film, Midsommar is not without flaws and is far from universally accessible. It is also frustrating the way the mainstream media is oblivious to the ongoing financial and critical success of the horror genre that has existed since the inception of cinema.
In his review in the New York Times Kyle Turner states that the new horror movie Host “seems to speak to a collective id” and serves as “an analogy for mourning the recent past”. I’ve read several other critiques of this nature that both praise the film and make similar philosophical musings upon its nature. As a long standing horror aficionado I am always a little sceptical when a new movie quickly gains a lot of traction and a critical consensus swiftly forms. Especially when a genre product suddenly gains the attention of the mainstream media who subsequently stray into hyperbole and hype. This happened last year with Midsommar which was hailed as a groundbreaking horror movie and indicative of a renaissance in the genre. Although an intelligent and disturbing film, Midsommar is not without flaws and is far from universally accessible. It is also frustrating the way the mainstream media is oblivious to the ongoing financial and critical success of the horror genre that has existed since the inception of cinema.
However, my ambivalence notwithstanding, in the past few days positive comments about Host have constantly appeared in my social media timelines, many of which come from grass roots sources that I trust (such as the Evolution of Horror podcast). Hence I signed up to a seven day free trial of the streaming service Shudder and watched Host under optimal conditions. IE knowing as little about the plot as possible and in a darkened room, late at night. Having had time to reflect upon my viewing and go through my notes, I believe that the popular consensus surrounding Host is certainly justified. The film is a finely honed 59 minutes, that is an intelligent reinvention of many classic horror tropes. Cleverly crafted, dovetailing modern fears and social angst with the traditional, it provides an array of scares while maintaining a tense atmosphere in that allegedly benign environment; the modern home. Is it a genre defining milestone? Not necessarily so but what it does do is tap into a lot of the psychological concerns prevalent in the current climate and integrate those into the established fear of the supernatural. Host is certainly very pertinent and “of the moment”.
Six friends, Haley, Jemma, Emma, Radina, Caroline and Teddy meet online via a Zoom video conference call. All are at home or living with partners during the ongoing lockdown. Rather than playing games or having a quiz Haley has hired a spiritual medium to hold a seance. Emma, Radina and Caroline are a little scared by the prospect of such a thing but Eddy and Jemma are both sceptical and prone to mocking it. Medium Seylan reminds the group to be respectful of the spirits and briefs them on managing their thoughts and most importantly how to correctly leave the “circle” if they become uncomfortable with the situation. As the seance progresses, Jemma screams when something touches her neck and she finds herself thinking of a friend from school called Jack who hung himself. Seylan is then disconnected from the call and one by one, each of the friends experience supernatural occurrences in their homes. Rather than contacting a benevolent spirit it becomes clear that they’ve enabled a far more malign force. Can they close the seance circle and dismiss the spectral guest?
One of the film’s greatest assets is the medium in which it is filmed. Buy using Zoom and phones on selfie sticks, there is a great sense of immediacy and the common place tech makes events more accessible. The narrative touches upon the frustrations and alien nature of the current lock down, something that is perhaps more keenly felt among the young. The characters are broadly likeable as well as plausible and the cast perform well. They’re behaviour is also in line with how people react in unknown situations. Some cope well, others go to pieces. As this is a UK production and there is a healthy dose of British colloquialisms and profanities. Where Host excels is in the effective use of its running time. The plot set up, introduction of the characters and dissent from normality into panic is perfectly paced. The idea of having the film last the length of a free Zoom call is sublime.
When supernatural events start to occur, they are initially small in scale and well implemented. Chairs move, a glass shatters and noises are heard off camera. There’s also an innovative use of the filters that come with contemporary phones and video conferencing software. In one scene the filter is triggered by the presence of the spirit and it is a genuinely scary and original sequence. Host handles the building tension well and has plenty of robust and jolting scares. If you are a long standing horror fan who has watched a prodigious amount of genre material, then you well may be able to predict some but not all. The creepy music box is an obviously telegraphed example but others will wrong foot you. The denouement is in some respects inevitable but that does not diminish its power. By the time it comes round you are so invested and engrossed in the proceedings that you still hope that things may work out.
Host is well made, inventive and exceedingly timely. It meets viewers expectations and delivers a white knuckle experience in spades. It’s also a textbook example of how the genre re-invents itself by taking its essential tropes and themes and interpreting in a way that is relevant for a modern audience. Host will especially resonate with the youth market but is still totally accessible to older horror fans who will recognise much that is traditional and de rigueur. I’m not sure if there is a universally accepted term for such movies as Host yet. Wikipedia classifies such productions as “computer screen films” and a subset of the “found footage” genre. However, I’m sure those associated with the production of Host such as director Rob Savage and writers Gemma Hurley and Jed Shepherd will find themselves much sought after. They’ll no doubt be a flood of inferior films in the months to come. But they won’t stand out like Host which has found an audience through talent, enterprise and a genuine appreciation of the genre.
The Last Broadcast (1998)
The Last Broadcast is a curious beast that straddles both the “mockumentary” and “found footage” genres. Shot entirely on consumer level video equipment, it effectively captures the look and feel of public access cable TV from the times. Released before the massive commercial success of The Blair Witch Project, The Last Broadcast did not find a comparable mainstream audience at the time, although it remains a favourite with genre fans. However, the movie has been recently re-released on Amazon Prime and subsequently become a talking point once again. Elements of the plot have proven very prophetic, such as the popularity of “ghost hunting” reality shows and the integration of online interactivity into live television. But the one standout aspect of The Last Broadcast which polarises viewer opinion is its ending. This is often seen as either a clever “sting in the tail” or an ill considered “jumping the shark” cop out.
The Last Broadcast is a curious beast that straddles both the “mockumentary” and “found footage” genres. Shot entirely on consumer level video equipment, it effectively captures the look and feel of public access cable TV from the times. Released before the massive commercial success of The Blair Witch Project, The Last Broadcast did not find a comparable mainstream audience at the time, although it remains a favourite with genre fans. However, the movie has been recently re-released on Amazon Prime and subsequently become a talking point once again. Elements of the plot have proven very prophetic, such as the popularity of “ghost hunting” reality shows and the integration of online interactivity into live television. But the one standout aspect of The Last Broadcast which polarises viewer opinion is its ending. This is often seen as either a clever “sting in the tail” or an ill considered “jumping the shark” cop out.
Filmmaker David Leigh (David Beard) is making a documentary about the murders of the hosts and crew of a cable TV show called Fact or Fiction. Presenters Steven "Johnny" Avkast (Stefan Avalos) and Locus Wheeler (Lance Weiler), along with sound recordist Rein Clackin (Rein Clabbers) and psychic Jim Suerd (James Seward) travel to the Pine Barrens in search of the Jersey Devil. Only Jim Suerd returns in a state of disorientation. The police mount a search and subsequently find the mutilated bodies of Wheeler and Clackins. Avakast remains missing although his hat is found by a pool of blood. Subsequent viewing of the video footage shows tensions between Suerd and the others and physical evidence soon leads to a quick conviction. However, Suerd dies in custody under mysterious circumstances while his appeal is pending. David Leigh subsequently obtains tape footage that was missing from the police investigation. Although damaged he hires data retrieval expert Michelle Monarch (Michelle Pulaski) to search for any viable material. Will this content reveal the truth?
The Last Broadcast does a good job of establishing its central characters and building up a credible biography on each through faux interviews with friends and officials. It also accurately reflects the “home brew” nature of cable TV and public access TV from the era. The use of IRC as a means for viewers to interact with the show’s hosts is an interesting snapshot of the times. Another clever aspect of the plot is the way in which the supernatural is teased and then sidelined. The Fact or Fiction hosts go in search of the Jersey Devil but viewers are not given a summary of the associated legend nor does the story go out of its way to imply that the murders are of a supernatural nature. Far more time is spent exploring whether Jum Suerd is a gifted psychic or a deluded, dangerous loner. Documentary filmmaker David Leigh also remains an enigma, although on face value he is simply investigating a story and hence shouldn’t be the focus of his own film.
The Last Broadcast proceeds at a measured pace and is a slow burn. There are some minor jump scares when interviews with people suddenly cut to pictures of the crime scene but overall the focus is on maintaining a mysterious atmosphere. The elephant in the room is the film’s climax, in which a computer enhanced image reveals the solution to the mystery. There is then a major shift in the technical style of the remainder of the movie which will either delight viewers or prove to be a deal breaking WTF moment. To say any more would be an overt spoiler. It is also worth noting that it is this aspect of the film that has kept the movie on fans radar and often becomes the focal point of discussion. Irrespective of this, there are many other aspects of The Last Broadcast that were ahead of its time. If you are a fan of this genre or a movie aficionado, then I’d recommend a viewing so you can decide upon the merits of the controversial ending.
The Tunnel (2011)
The Tunnel was released direct to Region 3 DVD on 19th May 2011, much the same as any other low budget horror movie. What made the marketing of this minor Aussie "Mockumentary" horror different to other similar products, is that the distributors decided to make a barebones copy of the film available for download, free of charge. The accompanying viral marketing campaign gained quite a lot of traction resulting in The Tunnel being heavily seeded across Bit Torrent sites and exposing the film to an audience of millions globally. Subsequently, when the movie was then showcased in the US and Europe and commercially released in other regions, its profile had been considerably raised. As a result of this novel marketing campaign and the fact that the movie is a better than average example of the found footage genre, The Tunnel won several awards on the festival circuit.
The Tunnel was released direct to Region 3 DVD on 19th May 2011, much the same as any other low budget horror movie. What made the marketing of this minor Aussie "Mockumentary" horror different to other similar products, is that the distributors decided to make a barebones copy of the film available for download, free of charge. The accompanying viral marketing campaign gained quite a lot of traction resulting in The Tunnel being heavily seeded across Bit Torrent sites and exposing the film to an audience of millions globally. Subsequently, when the movie was then showcased in the US and Europe and commercially released in other regions, its profile had been considerably raised. As a result of this novel marketing campaign and the fact that the movie is a better than average example of the found footage genre, The Tunnel won several awards on the festival circuit.
The Tunnel has a somewhat generic storyline, following an investigation into a government cover-up over an abandoned reservoir project, that intended to use a network of abandoned train tunnels under Sydney. TV journalist Natasha Warner (Bel Deliá) and her crew, Peter Ferguson (Andy Rodoreda), Steve Miller (Steve Davis), Jim ‘Tangles’ Williams (Luke Arnold), look for the truth within the subterranean maze, only to find themselves hunted by someone or something. The film consists of video footage taken by the crew on both HD and night vision cameras. Material taken by CCTV and webcams are also used to great effect. Where The Tunnel differs from other films shot in this style, is that it is presented as a completed documentary, and is intercut with "talking heads" from the surviving members of the crew.
Now it could be argued that the format of the film indicates quite quickly who lives and who dies, thus mitigating the suspense. However, this is not the case. It actually adds to the sense of faux credibility. The story unfolds at a measured pace and introduces us to the lead characters, all of whom are quite plausible. Steve Davis, a real-life cameraman, give a very good performance, effectively playing himself and drawing on his working experience. Luke Arnold, makes a suitable foil for him as soundman "Tangles". Director Carlo Ledesma builds a suitable back story regarding the politics of the reservoir project and the aims of the TV journalists before taking the action into the tunnels of the title. The shocks are efficient and subtle. The mysterious entity that stalks the network under the city is kept wisely off camera for most of the proceedings. Less is more in this case.
Once again, Australian cinema shows that it has far greater understanding of the craft of film making that mainstream Hollywood. The Tunnel is certainly formulaic, yet due to a better than average script and measured performances, manages to produce a superior genre offering. Unlike recent equivalent films such as Paranormal Activity franchise, it does not jump the shark when it comes to the scares and maintains sustained tense and threatening atmosphere. The found footage genre, like so many other subsets of horror, can often be no more than a vehicle for lazy and uninspired film making. The key to success in this case is to use the format in an innovative fashion and tell a story from a new perspective. The Tunnel achieves this by maintaining a credible pretence of being a genuine documentary. The framing narrative justifies a lot of the usual questions that arise from this genre, especially the ubiquitous “why keep filming”? Hence, The Tunnel is a superior genre entry and worth seeing by both horror fans and causal viewers.
Operation Avalanche (2016)
Conspiracy theories and found footage movies. Two genres with infinite scope to be tedious and uninspired on a low budget. Yet writer and director Matt Johnson manages to do something quite clever with both cinematic styles in his recent movie Operation Avalanche. He takes the basic conceit of the two formats and uses them to tell a tale based upon one of the most iconic moments of twentieth century history. Namely the moon landing of 1969. The results are surprising, intelligent and thought provoking, although a little uneven. Furthermore, I discovered this enjoyable curiosity via the GoodBadFlicks on You Tube. If you are interested in obscure and niche market genre creations then do check out this channel. It is informative, well presented and entertaining.
Conspiracy theories and found footage movies. Two genres with infinite scope to be tedious and uninspired on a low budget. Yet writer and director Matt Johnson manages to do something quite clever with both cinematic styles in his recent movie Operation Avalanche. He takes the basic conceit of the two formats and uses them to tell a tale based upon one of the most iconic moments of twentieth century history. Namely the moon landing of 1969. The results are surprising, intelligent and thought provoking, although a little uneven. Furthermore, I discovered this enjoyable curiosity via the GoodBadFlicks on You Tube. If you are interested in obscure and niche market genre creations then do check out this channel. It is informative, well presented and entertaining.
Back to Operation Avalanche. Director Matt Johnson, casts himself along with Owen Williams and Josh Boles as three graduate film makers hired by the CIA for their “A/V program”. Their work is not taken particularly seriously by senior staff and the trio soon find themselves facing dismissal. However, thy manage to talk their way into joining an ongoing operation searching for a Russian mole at NASA. Posing as an official government documentary crew they soon discover that there isn’t a mole but there is a major design flaw in the Lunar Module. This effectively makes the entire moon mission impossible and therefore a political and propaganda nightmare. It is at this point that Johnson’s character suggests that they fake the moon landing, thus guaranteeing the United States’ standing on the world stage. His bosses are initially sceptical but soon back the idea when they see how the plan can be carried out.
The central plot is great idea and the movie has sufficient plausibility to allow viewers to suspend their sense of disbelief for the first two acts. There are many popular culture and historical references during the course of the film which bolster the proceedings. Perhaps the cheekiest plot device is the referencing of Stanley Kubrick who is already a prime suspect among conspiracy theorists for “faking” the moon landings. In this instance, the team of CIA film makers pose as journalists and talk their way into an interview with Kubrick. A subsequent visit to the set of 2001: A Space Odyssey, allows them a chance to steal his special effects secrets and directly use them to help fabricate their own moon landing footage. I must admit this really did provoke an ironic chuckle from me. However, the estate of the late Stanley Kubrick did not see it this way and were singularly perturbed that his likeness had been used in such a fashion.
Unfortunately, the denouement of Operation Avalanche is somewhat disappointing. The CIA decides to clean house and eliminate any lose ends and the film develops into a formulaic chase scenario. This sadly mitigates the found footage angle of the plot. Up until this point the logic behind the plot device of continuously filming all that is happening is quite credible. Exactly why you would continue to do so when being pursued and shot at by government agents is questionable. Another minor niggle that works against the film is that the lead character, played by Matt Johnson, is not very likeable. He is bombastic, manipulative and a self-centred risk taker. These may well be necessary qualities in an agent but they’re hardly required traits in a cinematic hero. However, irrespective of its flaws, there’s a lot of creativity present in Operation Avalanche and it is sufficient to propel the movie forward at an entertaining pace. If we must have movies from such genres, then Operation Avalanche sets a solid precedence for the type we’d like more of.
Cloverfield (2008)
I did my best to avoid the hype surrounding the initial release of Cloverfield. Such media saturation and public interest can often cloud the issue of whether the actual film is any good. Five years later and having watched the movie twice, once in the theatre and once at home, I am still somewhat conflicted about this movie. The use of hand held video cameras is both a boon and a bane. The constant movement of the image has proven to cause motion sickness for some viewers, although this is not so overwhelming when viewed on a smaller screen at home. Yet the medium of news footage mixed with handheld cameras does create a palpable sense of immediacy. This helps immensely when trying to sell a fantastic concept, such as the one that Cloverfield features.
I did my best to avoid the hype surrounding the initial release of Cloverfield. Such media saturation and public interest can often cloud the issue of whether the actual film is any good. Five years later and having watched the movie twice, once in the theatre and once at home, I am still somewhat conflicted about this movie. The use of hand held video cameras is both a boon and a bane. The constant movement of the image has proven to cause motion sickness for some viewers, although this is not so overwhelming when viewed on a smaller screen at home. Yet the medium of news footage mixed with handheld cameras does create a palpable sense of immediacy. This helps immensely when trying to sell a fantastic concept, such as the one that Cloverfield features.
Well let's get the obvious out of the way first. Yes, this film is potentially an act of national catharses over the events of 9/11. In the same way that the 1954 Godzilla (Gojira) was the Japanese way of dealing with the Atomic Bombing at the end of the war. The hand-held mockumentary style does lend and element of contemporary credibility to the proceeding. However more discerning film fans will be familiar with this technique in several other productions, such as The Blair Witch Project, The Last Broadcast, Ghostwatch, Cannibal Holocaust, REC and Diary Of The Dead. The film also utilises the classic plot device of only hinting at the monster. The fleeting glimpses caught between the skyscrapers of the Manhattan skyline are extremely well done and certainly contribute to the sense of horror and unease.
The story moves at a fast pace and the movie has a near perfect plot to running time ratio. It does not out stay its welcome and concludes in a fashion one would expect from such a genre production. There is little or no information given out in relation to the nature of the creature that has appeared or where it has hailed from. This works well, as the central theme is not the monster per se, but how people and governments deal with cataclysmic events. It is both scary and shocking but the violence is never overstated. But where Cloverfield fails is with its central characters. They are not as under developed as you would expect. They are simply unlikeable. In an effort to appeal to the target audience demographics, the producers focus on quartet of young "yuppies". Sadly, they are shallow and crass people. The women scream and the men just bellow, unable to deal with the unfolding events. This is not implausible, just depressingly credible. It's a shame that the makers of this film did not show as much flare and imagination for their central protagonists as they did with the visual effects and production design.
Now the actual creature itself, as mentioned above, remains cunningly hidden for the bulk of the film. It is quite ironic that a creature of such size can remain so well hidden in the densely built urban environment of New York. There is a particularly good aerial shot that shows the creature striding between buildings and subject to an air strike from a Stealth bomber. It is hinted that it is eating people that cross its path, a fact that is later more overtly established when the beats is revealed to our gaze in Central park. I personally think that this was a mistake and that the once clearly observed, the well-designed creature loses some of its mystique. I'm sure that the production team were also influenced to the work of H.P. Lovecraft and the Cthulhu Mythos. Similar giant alien beasts are briefly seen in Frank Darabont's The Mist. There is also a secondary threat brought about by the creature in the shape of parasites that are shaken loose from its body. These arthropods are the size of a dog and their bite presents another set of problems.
Overall, Cloverfield is a very enjoyable film. It is scary enough to appeal to a range of audiences and maintains a steady pace that carries the narrative beyond the obvious flaws and plot holes. Slightly older viewers and Europeans may find the American youth a little grating but after the opening plot exposition, we are fully immersed in the ongoing disaster. We then have an exhilarating ride for the remaining hour. Hence the movie is recommended as an example of well-produced populist entertainment and as a better example of the found footage genre. It should be noted that the 2016 film 10 Cloverfield Lane is not a direct sequel per se but more of a tangential follow up. Allegedly a third film is being made that will bring the various plot threads of all movies together.
Sinister (2012)
Scott Derrickson’s Sinister is a curious blending of genres and classic plot devices. It certainly has some interesting ideas at the centre of its plot. Ethan Hawke plays a true-crime writer Ellison Oswalt, looking for his next big story and desperate to find fame again. After discovering a box full of Super 8 home movies in the attic of his new house, matters start to take a turn for the worst. The films appear to depict the real murders of several families and investigations lead to a series of strange unsolved crime and the possible involvement of supernatural forces. Could a pagan deity known as Bughuul, who allegedly preys upon the souls of children, be responsible? Is Oswalt’s own family in danger? Do bears conduct their personal business in deciduous forests?
Scott Derrickson’s Sinister is a curious blending of genres and classic plot devices. It certainly has some interesting ideas at the center of its plot. Ethan Hawke plays a true-crime writer Ellison Oswalt, looking for his next big story and desperate to find fame again. After discovering a box full of Super 8 home movies in the attic of his new house, matters start to take a turn for the worst. The films appear to depict the real murders of several families and investigations lead to a series of strange unsolved crime and the possible involvement of supernatural forces. Could a pagan deity known as Bughuul, who allegedly preys upon the souls of children, be responsible? Is Oswalt’s own family in danger? Do bears conduct their personal business in deciduous forests?
Sinister is a film of two very distinct halves. The opening set-up and subsequent plot exposition is technically well done, atmospheric and unnerving. The use of Super-8 film to show the murdered families, works very well and is constructed in a genuinely creepy manner. The found-footage sequences are a plot device within the main story, rather than the basis of the entire movie. This is by far the films best asset. Yet the tipping point comes when Bughuul physically manifests itself and the inferred threat becomes more immediate and less mysterious. At this point, Sinister becomes a far more perfunctory horror movie and heads towards a rather obvious bleak ending.
It saddens me to be so critical of Sinister, as watching a R rated horror movie is quite a rare experience these days. It’s a shame that the entire film could not be as convincingly scripted and compellingly filmed as the first half. Similar tonal inconsistencies featured in Director Scott Derrickson’s earlier movie, The Exorcism of Emily Rose. That too suffered dramatically once it made the conscious decision to show the supernatural rather than imply it. However, Sinister does benefit from Ethan Hawke who brings a little more to the role than expected and there are some adequate scares along the way. Yet these can't quite compensate for formulaic denouement, leaving viewers with a distinct feeling that Sinister has not reached its full potential.
Furthermore, whoever was responsible for the video marketing campaign for this movie certainly hasn’t done it any favours. The entire plot and virtually every scare were included in the various trailers and TV promos, totally mitigating any potential suspense the movie may have had upon release. It must be very frustrating for jobbing directors such as Scott Derrickson. Not only are they hamstrung by the commercial demands of the producers but any tricks that they may have up their sleeves are shamelessly given away by the marketing campaign. Yet despite these shortcomings the public found sufficient merit in Sinister to generate a healthy box office return. Thus, we were subsequently regaled with Sinister 2 in 2015. Sadly, it was not an improvement.
Apollo 18 (2011)
A fundamental requirement of cinema is that the audience suspends their sense of disbelief. Anything that breaks this will immediately has a negative impact upon the viewing experience. There are many things can severe this connection but the two most common seem to be obvious plot holes and Scooby Doo behaviour IE “Let’s split up…”. If these are the result of simply poor film making, then they can perhaps be forgiven. Every director has to learn their craft. However, if these two factors are present by design, then that is an unpardonable sin. Assuming that your audience is stupid, is insulting and the worse sort of hypocrisy.
A fundamental requirement of cinema is that the audience suspends their sense of disbelief. Anything that breaks this will immediately has a negative impact upon the viewing experience. There are many things can severe this connection but the two most common seem to be obvious plot holes and Scooby Doo behaviour IE “Let’s split up…”. If these are the result of simply poor film making, then they can perhaps be forgiven. Every director has to learn their craft. However, if these two factors are present by design, then that is an unpardonable sin. Assuming that your audience is stupid, is insulting and the worse sort of hypocrisy.
Apollo 18 has a strong start for a movie built around the found footage concept. It plays very nicely into the current appetite for conspiracy theories. The first thirty minutes where we meet the cast and learn of their covert mission to place monitoring equipment on the moon, is credible and intriguing. The cold war setting and the post-Watergate back drop do a lot to fuel the narrative. During this initial third of the movie, Apollo 18 plays more like a political thriller rather than a sci-fi shocker. But then director Gonzalo Lopez-Gallego goes and jumps the shark and all the previous good work goes out the window. It’s a common problem with contemporary film making. I remember having exactly the same thoughts when I saw Paranormal Activity.
After a string of anomalous events a key character makes the most illogical leap of thought and as a result the credibility simply melts away. You see, I take the attitude that NASA astronauts are trained professional, hand picked because of their skills and analytical mindset. Maintaining rational under extreme circumstances must surely feature in their training. So, I simply do not buy into the idea that, because they’ve found an abandoned Russian Lunar Module, a dead cosmonaut, picked up radio interference, had the flag that they planted removed and found some unidentified marking in the lunar soil, naturally concluded that it must be extraterrestrials. Scientists simply do not think this way.
The rest of the film is arbitrary and derivative bug hunt, with obviously telegraphed jumps. The conclusion involving complicit government agencies is predictable and uninspired. This is a shame because the film is very well made from a technical perspective. But once again we have a production that demonstrates a clear understanding of visuals but not plot construction. Furthermore, Apollo 18 also seems to forget that it is a found footage movie, with scenes and dialogue that are contrived to be more cinematic and come dangerously close to breaking the fourth wall.
With reference to the plot holes, I unlike other critics was not particularly bothered about the nebulous nature of the alien life forms featured in the film. I am happy to watch movies without every answer being given to me on a plate. Life is seldom clear cut, is it? However, I do balk at the fundamental flaw that permeates Apollo 18. The film comprises of 16 mm & 35 mm cine footage along with video material from external cameras. Now the latter may well have been broadcasted and thus been received and recorded back on earth. But the cine film had to be collected and developed. Does the film not hinge on the premise that no mission has subsequently returned to the moon? Also, the Russian Lunar Module and US Command module where both destroyed, therefore eliminating any footage they may have had. No, this is simply bad screen writing and brings me neatly full circle to my original point that I started with.
Tape 407 (2012)
I really won't be sad to see the back of the found footage sub-genre because it really is becoming an over saturated market at present. For example, at the last count there were six Paranormal Activity movies, with their respective quality inversely proportional to their number in the franchise. Yes, there are the occasional good ones, such as the recent Operation Avalanche, which tackled conspiracy theories and the Moon Landing. But broadly speaking, this genre has become a dumping ground for cheap and uninspired movies, by mediocre film makers, out to make a fast buck. Take for example Tape 407 (AKA Area 407). It’s chosen twist on the genre is the inclusion of included dinosaurs. I was hoping that this would make the film sufficiently different to others and offers something new. Predictably it did not.
I really won't be sad to see the back of the found footage sub-genre because it really is becoming an over saturated market at present. For example, at the last count there were six Paranormal Activity movies, with their respective quality inversely proportional to their number in the franchise. Yes, there are the occasional good ones, such as the recent Operation Avalanche, which tackled conspiracy theories and the Moon Landing. But broadly speaking, this genre has become a dumping ground for cheap and uninspired movies, by mediocre film makers, out to make a fast buck. Take for example Tape 407 (AKA Area 407). It’s chosen twist on the genre is the inclusion of included dinosaurs. I was hoping that this would make the film sufficiently different to others and offers something new. Predictably it did not.
Tape 407 starts aboard a plane with a motley collection of passengers travelling from New York back to Los Angeles. We meet film student Jessie (Samantha Lester) and her annoying younger sister Trish (Abigail Schrader), Journalist Jimmy (James Lyons) and irritable passenger from hell Charlie (Brendan Patrick Connor). After some rather pedestrian back story and character exposition the plane crashes in a somewhat remote desert region along its route. The survivors bicker and squabble and continuously talk across each other as they try to thrash out a survival strategy. One passenger goes looking for the other half of the plane. Screams and animal noises are later heard in the night. It quickly becomes clear that there are multiple predators on the loose.
There are brief flashes of inspiration in Tape 407, as well as a great deal of shouting and strident arguments conducted in a very American manner. It’s annoying and grating on the ear but certainly has a note of realism about it. The survivors slowly put aside their differences as they finally realise the magnitude of their predicament and attempt to work collaboratively. However, this aspect of the storyline is under developed and further hampered by a cast of characters I didn't really care for. Futhermore, the shocks are somewhat obvious, surprisingly understated and tame. As for the dinosaurs, which appear to be the result of a government experiment, precious little is seen. You simply can't skimp on plot device like this if it’s the movies selling point.
There's a fine line between being ambiguous and letting the audience fill in the blanks as opposed to allowing gaping plot holes. By the time I reached the end of Tape 407, I was annoyed by the lack of information, disappointed by the absence of carnivorous reptiles and thoroughly pissed off with the protagonists. The only worthy character, Air Marshall Laura (Melanie Lyons), was dispatched in a very mean spirited way. Mercifully the director opted for an appropriately downbeat dénouement so the remaining cast where subsequently killed off, offering an unexpected highpoint to a formulaic and unremarkable ninety-minute pot boiler.
I don't know whether budgetary restraints or simply the notion that less is more, where the reason the production was so shy of showing the dinosaur antagonists. If it was, then directors (Dale Fabrigar and Everette Wallin) intention to sideline them so they could focus on the human dynamics, was a very poor decision. Overall the slow pacing, noisy performances and frustrating characters as well as lack of action, torpedoes Tape 407. Viewers are left with a rather dull, predictable and lacklustre movie. I'd like to say that this will be the last found footage I'll be watching for a while but I have a suspicion that due to the cost effective nature of the format, they’ll be churning them out for a while yet.
Grave Encounters 2 (2012)
Sometimes you have to admire persistence. I really didn't think that Grave Encounters merited a sequel but apparently, it's financial returns indicated otherwise. So today I found myself watching Grave Encounters 2 with a certain sense of déjà vu because like the first movie, it tries to do something different and only partially succeeds. Once again, the writers (The Vicious Brothers) manage to jump the shark at the midway point and the movie ceases to innovate and just ticks boxes. The only major difference this time round is we get a little more of everything, because it is a sequel. So, there's more jumps, more ghosts and more violence. Is there more entertainment? May be.
Sometimes you have to admire persistence. I really didn't think that Grave Encounters merited a sequel but apparently, it's financial returns indicated otherwise. So today I found myself watching Grave Encounters 2 with a certain sense of déjà vu because like the first movie, it tries to do something different and only partially succeeds. Once again, the writers (The Vicious Brothers) manage to jump the shark at the midway point and the movie ceases to innovate and just ticks boxes. The only major difference this time round is we get a little more of everything, because it is a sequel. So, there's more jumps, more ghosts and more violence. Is there more entertainment? May be.
The movie starts with a series of faux YouTube reviews of the original Grave Encounters. This is a fun way to start proceedings because not all the vloggers give favourable opinions. Then we meet indie horror film maker Alex (Richard Harmon) and his respective crew, who is convinced that the movie is in fact true. The more he digs for clues, the more his theory is validated. It is this first half of the story that works the best. Alex receives anonymous tip-offs via text and email from Deathawaits6. He also tracks down the producer of the first film and via a hidden camera, uncovers a chilling secret. As with the first movie, although the cast is mainly comprised of a bunch of unpleasant characters, they do all ring true.
It takes thirty-eight minutes before the action arrives at the asylum. Curiously enough as the spooky stuff starts my interest in the movie took a sharp dip. The gadgets, cameras and technological paraphernalia used by such reality shows are all present here and this does embellish the proceedings to a degree. A thermal imaging camera is used this time, introduced via a rather obvious and crass gag. There are also some further explorations of the building's ability to change shape and alter its layout. Whilst running in panic, one character turns a corner into a corridor but their friends take the same turn only to find a brick wall.
However there reaches a point in the story, not unlike the original, where the writers take too many liberties with the audience’s suspension of disbelief. Again, the first-person narrative give ways to material that feels much more like conventional third person cinema. The moment that happens the main selling point for the production is lost and mediocrity sets in. Grave Encounters 2 also ends with a rather more violent incident that seems a little out of place with what has previously transpired. It's rather gloating and mean spirited. The final resolution of the plot is somewhat obvious and worryingly paves the way for a third instalment.
I found myself reminded of Book of Shadows: Blair Witch 2 when watching Grave Encounters 2. Both sequels attempt to do something tangential to their predecessors, rather than rinse and repeat but both seem to get lost after initial bursts of creativity. Overall I would say that I enjoyed Grave Encounters 2, more than the first part, mainly because of its self-referential and self-deprecating first act. As I said at the beginning, persistence can be an endearing quality. Although I really am getting exasperated with the found footage sub-genre, one should acknowledge effort, even if it is misplaced. The Vicious Brothers have tried more so than other film makers to experiment and even managed to raise a wry smile. Their tongue must have been planted firmly in their cheek when one of the characters describes Hollywood as "the film Mecca of the world".
Grave Encounters (2011)
I had high hopes for Grave Encounters after I saw the Trailer on You Tube six years ago. It got quite a lot of attention online, due to it jumping on the found footage bandwagon and by cashing in on the popularity of supernatural reality TV. The movie poster takes great pains to reference that fact. Shows such as Ghost Hunters and Most Haunted still pull in big TV ratings. Even I've been guilty of watching them in the past. So the idea of a TV crew investigating the paranormal and genuinely encountering it sounded very promising. Alas, Grave Encounters fails to reach it's potential in my opinion, although my primary objection hinges on a very subjective preconception. One that other viewers may not share.
I had high hopes for Grave Encounters after I saw the Trailer on You Tube six years ago. It got quite a lot of attention online, due to it jumping on the found footage bandwagon and by cashing in on the popularity of supernatural reality TV. The movie poster takes great pains to reference that fact. Shows such as Ghost Hunters and Most Haunted still pull in big TV ratings. Even I've been guilty of watching them in the past. So the idea of a TV crew investigating the paranormal and genuinely encountering it sounded very promising. Alas, Grave Encounters fails to reach it's potential in my opinion, although my primary objection hinges on a very subjective preconception. One that other viewers may not share.
The first act sets the scene very well with the documentary crew arriving at the Collingwood Psychiatric Hospital where unexplained phenomena has been reported for years. Front man Lance Preston (Sean Rogerson) is a self-obsessed individual and more than happy to contrive material just to make a good show. He bribes the caretaker to make false anecdotes and colludes with medium Houston Gray (Mackenzie Gray) to get the right shots and dialogue. After setting up their equipment and getting locked in for the night a series of progressively more disturbing events begin to unfold. At first these are the standard sort of ambiguous happening that are common place on these reality shows. Doors are slammed, object are moved and footsteps are heard. The movie works very well up to this point.
After an incident with EVP and the female crew member having her hair pulled, the team are genuinely startled. It is obvious that up to this point they have never truly believed in their work. So they decide to leave the building and are forced to break through the locked front doors. It is at this point in the plot that a perfectly adequate concept is abandoned for something much more ambitious. Instead of the finding the drive and grounds on the other side of the entrance, the crew finds yet more hospital corridors. The subsequent search reveals that the building is in some sort of Möbius loop and that despite the passage of time, it remains dark outside.
It is this very bold and possibly over reaching idea that I found to be the main problem with Grave Encounters. If this had been made as a traditional horror movie, shot from a third person perspective, then such a plot shift may well have been acceptable. Because Grave Encounters is shot as a faux documentary, such a major jump in the scope of the plot simply strains one’s sense of disbelief too much. If the movie had confined itself to just a single night with some low key supernatural encounters, it may well have been a superior piece of work. As it is, it jumps the shark within the idiom of the genre, offering predictable and clearly telegraphed shocks, culminating in a rather obvious ending that steps into the realms of the occult.
People have criticised Grave Encounters for its two-dimensional characters, bad dialogue and cheap digital FXs. I think this is somewhat missing the point because these have always been the mainstay of the horror genre over the last six decades. For me the film fails because it over reaches itself and ends up falling between two stools. One critic labelled it the "bastard child of The Blair Witch Project and House on Haunted Hill" which certainly sum ups what the film makers where trying to achieve. My advice is to only watch this movie if you are prepared to be forgiving. Grave Encounters in spite of its poster tagline, is neither one of the scariest or memorable movies of the year. It is adequate but flawed.
Lake Mungo (2008)
Do not be fooled by the marketing and artwork for Lake Mungo. It is not a found footage movie but in fact a faux documentary. If you are looking for cheap scares, loud noises and unpleasant imagery, then you will be disappointed. Lake Mungo is not your standard exploitation fodder. If however you like well constructed movies that create a genuine sense of disquiet, then Lake Mungo is a must see. Once again Australian cinema has managed to produce an innovative and thoughtful entry to a popular sub-genre. The film demonstrates a great understanding of the mechanics of a ghost story and how they should be handled.
Do not be fooled by the marketing and artwork for Lake Mungo. It is not a found footage movie but in fact a faux documentary. If you are looking for cheap scares, loud noises and unpleasant imagery, then you will be disappointed. Lake Mungo is not your standard exploitation fodder. If however you like well constructed movies that create a genuine sense of disquiet, then Lake Mungo is a must see. Once again Australian cinema has managed to produce an innovative and thoughtful entry to a popular sub-genre. The film demonstrates a great understanding of the mechanics of a ghost story and how they should be handled.
The story centres around the Palmer family whose teenage daughter Alice drowned on a family holiday. The movie is shot in the style of a TV documentary, with talking heads, home video footage and recorded phone calls to the emergency services. The performances are very understated and very plausible. The opening scenes quickly establish a very credible depiction of a family coming to terms with loss. Performances by the three leads (Rosie Traynor, David Pledger and Martin Sharpe) are universally good as the Palmers. Shortly after Alice's funeral paranormal activity starts to happen within the house. The Mother is plagued by a recurring dream and the Father sees a manifestation of Alice. Matters are further confused by some photographic evidence that may indicate that Alice is not dead.
All these events are handled in a very understated and measured fashion. As the story progresses and the strain takes its toll on the Palmer family, we are introduced to a medium Ray (Steve Jodrell). Unlike other movies, this is a very sympathetic depiction of the profession and it adds a very different aspect to the narrative. The interview sessions and seances do not necessarily produce the results the viewer expects but like so many elements of Lake Mungo, these subtle sub-plots all have relevance and are tied up as the story progresses. There are several false positive events that occur as the film proceeds (one that particularly reminded me of Ghostwatch) which muddy the waters. This really helps add a credible element of doubt with the audience.
The pivotal plot moment occurs when Alice's Mother discovers her daughter’s secret. It is a terribly sad turn of events and it is purposely ambiguous in some of its details. One of the major themes of Lake Mungo is that of the transition of Alice Palmer; from a happy, outgoing teenage girl to a desperate and burdened soul. As well as the unsettling supernatural atmosphere, there is a great sense of tragedy to the movie. It also plays upon a parents fear of being powerless to help their child. Furthermore, even as the story reaches a point where you think it’s done, there are still several further twists in store. These widen the scope of the events and introduce some bolder ideas.
Lake Mungo is a film about grief, secrets, unfinished business and predestination. It conclusion is satisfactory and very melancholy. Alice Palmer is a very sympathetic character and there seems no justification for what happens to her. Like many things that occur in life, there is a great deal that is not explained. This is not because the writers are trying to be manipulative but because this is just the way of world. Director Joel Anderson maintains a steady pace and does not take liberties with the viewer’s suspension of disbelief. As the credits roll over a montage of photographs there is a further surprise, implying that the false positives we saw earlier were in fact genuine. It is a clever embellishment to end on and a validation of the movies merits.
