Yet More Games We Cannot Play
Despite being over 5 years old, there still seems to be an active community playing Battlefield V. Having recently watched some multiplayer videos on YouTube, I decided to buy the game and have a go. Mainly because I had a hankering to fly a BF-109. Mercifully, this enterprise only cost me £5 because as you’ve probably guessed by the title of this post, things didn't go well. Although not as complex as a flight simulator, the controls for flying a plane in Battlefield V are involved. The main obstacle for me is turning the plane, which requires using both thumbsticks on the Xbox controller that I use. I tend to oversteer and lose control of the plane. I’m sure the problem can be overcome with practice but therein lies the rub. It would take a great deal of time and patience. Weeks, maybe months. I’m not going to invest in such an undertaking for something that is just a transient amusement.
Despite being over 5 years old, there still seems to be an active community playing Battlefield V. Having recently watched some multiplayer videos on YouTube, I decided to buy the game and have a go. Mainly because I had a hankering to fly a BF-109. Mercifully, this enterprise only cost me £5 because as you’ve probably guessed by the title of this post, things didn't go well. Although not as complex as a flight simulator, the controls for flying a plane in Battlefield V are involved. The main obstacle for me is turning the plane, which requires using both thumbsticks on the Xbox controller that I use. I tend to oversteer and lose control of the plane. I’m sure the problem can be overcome with practice but therein lies the rub. It would take a great deal of time and patience. Weeks, maybe months. I’m not going to invest in such an undertaking for something that is just a transient amusement.
This is a shame because flying around, blowing shit up in a BF-109 looks a lot of fun and really cool but the reality of gaming is that we can’t be good at everything and some titles are simply beyond our reach to master or more often than not, simply require effort beyond that we’re prepared to make. Sometimes a game can elude us because of one or two simple mechanics. Things that can fundamentally alter the overall game experience for some players, tipping the balance from challenging but rewarding to a massive pain in the ass. One of the reasons I didn’t buy the latest iteration of Call of Duty was because of the omni-movement system. For me it added an excessive layer of complexity and was something else that benefitted gamers with more nimble fingers and faster reactions. The Skill Based Match Making was also a pain, with inconsistent grouping and player manipulation.
However, a problematic mechanic doesn’t necessarily exclude you from a game forever. For example I really enjoyed the second and third instalments of The Witcher franchise but simply couldn’t cope with the combat system in the first game. It seemed to me to be staggeringly unintuitive and quickly became a source of annoyance. I ended up watching someone else play through the game on YouTube, so I could see the story completed, rather than do it myself. However, the game is currently getting remade and it would appear that the combat systems in the remake will be brought in line with that of the later iterations of The Witcher. If this is the case, then the game will finally be accessible to me, which would be nice. Yet I am old enough and wise enough to realise that the list of games I cannot play will continue to grow over time. Mainly due to me.
More Games We Cannot Play
Nearly six years ago, I wrote a post about games that I wanted to play but couldn’t due to my inherent lack of skill and coordination. Since then I have also written about several games that I would like to enjoy but can’t, because they’re multiplayer and I do not know anyone else that plays them. I have also pointed out in subsequent posts that my personal experience of some games is nothing like that shown in the promotional videos. This is often due to the two aforementioned reasons. C’est la vie. Such is the nature of video games. Some you can play, others you can’t. Fortunately the latter doesn’t happen that often and by and large, I get by just fine. However, recently the phenomenon of “games we cannot play” has raised its ugly head once again. So I thought I’d share my latest thoughts on the matter.
Nearly six years ago, I wrote a post about games that I wanted to play but couldn’t due to my inherent lack of skill and coordination. Since then I have also written about several games that I would like to enjoy but can’t, because they’re multiplayer and I do not know anyone else that plays them. I have also pointed out in subsequent posts that my personal experience of some games is nothing like that shown in the promotional videos. This is often due to the two aforementioned reasons. C’est la vie. Such is the nature of video games. Some you can play, others you can’t. Fortunately the latter doesn’t happen that often and by and large, I get by just fine. However, recently the phenomenon of “games we cannot play” has raised its ugly head once again. So I thought I’d share my latest thoughts on the matter.
The First Person Shooter genre is no easy ride. The most popular titles are the embodiment of twitch gaming, where the nimble fingered and quick witted rule and those adjusting their Pince-nez and squinting at their monitors are destroyed. But they can be very entertaining and often the developers will build mitigations into the various game systems to help those on a “death streak”. Also if you can’t out gun other players you can sometimes out think them, so even the slower gamer can still enjoy such franchises as Call of Duty, Battlefield and Fortnite. However, if you want a really hardcore FPS which focuses on realism and with minimal perks, then there is Hell Let Loose. This World War II themed game features 50 vs. 50 battles between two teams of either Germans, Americans and Soviets forces.
The Tactical Brit plays Hell Let Loose
Hell Let Loose is a tough FPS with no regenerating health, weapons with iron sights and squad based dynamics. It requires coordination, situational awareness and skill. The maps feel authentic and combat is compelling and intense. No matter how good a player you are, you will die. Frequently. Sadly, I find the game so punishing as a whole, I cannot enjoy it personally. If you wish to succeed in Hell Let Loose, then you have to commit to the game and dedicate yourself to learning the maps, honing your skills and cultivating a group of like minded friends. For me that is too steep a learning curve and I don’t think the “journey” would be fun. So for the present I have relegated Hell Let Loose from a game I play to a game I watch other play on Twitch or YouTube.
Another title that I recently tried is Dark and Darker. If you’ve ever wondered what would happen if you took an extraction shooter such as Escape From Tarkov and crossed it with Morrowind, then you end up with Dark and Darker. You create your character from a selection of classic fantasy classes, then form a group either with friends or “random players” and then enter the dungeon. You undertake missions, cross swords with other players and then you exit. This is another game where the reality of playing is different from what you think it may be. The first person perspective is difficult when it comes to swordplay and using a bow. The maps are hard to learn and at present in the game’s development (early access), the segregation of new and seasoned players is not always effective. This can lead to unbalanced encounters with other players. Dark and Darker is also a game where if you play with a group of friends you will enjoy a far superior experience to simply playing solo or with random players.
Character creation in Dark and Darker
Finally, I wish to return to the matter of my Nintendo Switch. There are a wealth of good games available for this handheld device but I have now concluded after two years that buying this was a mistake. It’s not just a question of not enjoying games via a handheld device, I think it is entirely down to being institutionalised by my existing gaming habits. I equate gaming with playing via my PC. I also spend a great deal of my time sitting at my desk reading, writing and perusing the internet. The PC is the hub of these activities. I even connected my Nintendo Switch to one of my monitors so I could play while at my desk but to no avail. It remains this adjunct to my existing status quo and despite trying, I can’t change my perspective. But ultimately, that’s okay. You can’t accommodate and embrace everything, be it in gaming or in real life. There are games we cannot play and indeed consoles we can’t either.
Games We Cannot Play
I have written in the past about how certain games can be very appealing conceptually but the reality is quite different. Often the fundamental disappointment doesn't lie with the game itself but with our inability to play them. For me the Battlefield franchise is a prime example of this and more recently For Honor. The trailers for these games are frenetic, focusing on action and spectacle. The associated marketing certainly sells the idea of “awesome action”. Sadly, my personal experience of Battlefield has usually been running across an inordinately large map, only to arrive at the hot spot to get one-shotted. As for the planes, helicopters and vehicles; I can't fly them or drive them effectively so team mates tend to abandon me. I can only describe my experience in For Honor as being a flesh piñata for other players. The fun experience depicted in the advertising was as elusive as a good, odd numbered Star Trek movie.
I have written in the past about how certain games can be very appealing conceptually but the reality is quite different. Often the fundamental disappointment doesn't lie with the game itself but with our inability to play them. For me the Battlefield franchise is a prime example of this and more recently For Honor. The trailers for these games are frenetic, focusing on action and spectacle. The associated marketing certainly sells the idea of “awesome action”. Sadly, my personal experience of Battlefield has usually been running across an inordinately large map, only to arrive at the hot spot to get one-shotted. As for the planes, helicopters and vehicles; I can't fly them or drive them effectively so team mates tend to abandon me. I can only describe my experience in For Honor as being a flesh piñata for other players. The fun experience depicted in the advertising was as elusive as a good, odd numbered Star Trek movie.
This is one of the reasons I gave up on EVE Online after a fortnight free trial. I simply could not progress in the game through a lack of skill and a chronic tolerance and patience deficit. With other game genres such as first person shooters or massive online battle arenas, I broadly have the same lack of success. Often with titles such as Overwatch and Guardians of Middle-earth it boils down to twitch gaming. Sadly, this is the prerogative of youth. For someone my age, by the time I’ve adjusted my Pince-nez, taken a sip of Madeira and pondered on the matter in hand, I find that I’ve been defeated. And don’t even get me started on flight simulators. What could possibly be cooler than flying a classic warplane or an iconic commercial airliner? Yet the complexity of such titles is beyond me. Nope, with the best will in the world, these sorts of games are not for me. As Harry Callahan said in Magnum Force, "A man's got to know his limitations".
I think most gamers of sound mind eventually arrive at a similar conclusion. Through trial and error, we establish what we can and cannot play. There are a few alleged renaissance men and women that claim otherwise, although most of these are delusional. As for those who genuinely can succeed with all game genres, well they deserve nothing more than a slap for making the rest of us look bad. Yet despite this reality, as humans we like to occasionally take leave of our senses and buy a game that’s sale that we have no hope in hell of succeeding at. I did this several years ago when I bought Ace Combat Assault Horizon Enhanced Edition for the PC. In my defense one of the first reviews that I skimmed through described it as "Call of Duty takes to the skies". At the time my first play through was a dismal failure and I didn’t reach the end. This weekend, I dusted off Ace Combat Assault Horizon Enhanced Edition for round two.
In many respects the CoD analogy is quite accurate. The game has a scaled back control system for the various planes and helicopters and is designed to be used with a game controller. The central campaign storyline is like Modern Warfare in so far as it has a generic World War III narrative filled with caricatures. There's then co-op and multiplayer online missions to be played in various permutations. The thing is, even with the game difficulty dropped to the lowest setting, I still found controlling the planes exceptionally taxing. At one point, I felt I may gain better results if I put a bag over my head and trusted to luck. It took hours before I realised that the on-screen messages that I was berating for blocking my view, were giving me hints. Upon taking the advice there was a significant improvement. However, I still found myself struggling with such things as orientation and situational awareness. For a second time, I have abandoned Ace Combat Assault Horizon Enhanced Edition only half completed.
It's an odd thing, coming to terms with the fact that there are some games that just aren't for you. We quickly learn while growing up that we can't be good at everything in life. Music, art, academia or sport are not for everyone. By and large we get over these things. Well, most of us do. Furthermore, we adapt. If you can't hold a tune, it’s no big deal. If you find yourself in a situation that requires you to sing, just mime. Half your church congregation does this regularly. Not especially good at sports? No worries; you can still enjoy them on TV and your lack of ability certainly is no impediment to being an armchair expert. But the notion that you can't be good at a game is troubling to some. I wonder exactly how many titles fill the average gamer's library that remain uncompleted, abandoned and forgotten; due to the realisation that they were crap at playing them? I’d hazard a guess it’s far more common place than you think.