The Great Blaugust Comment Debate
This year’s Blaugust: Festival of Blogging has already raised a very interesting debate. An old one that habitually comes up when discussing blogs. Namely, whether a blog should or should not have “comments” enabled. However this time round there is a different slant on things. Rather than the usual binary choice of having comments enabled or disabled on your site, this time round there is a third option available. Leaving comments via email or a third party service such as Mastodon. Both of these additional options keep comments conspicuously at arms length from your website. Furthermore, the email option makes the comments private, instead of in the public domain. All of which puts a subtly different spin on conventional notions of blog comments and makes this ongoing discussion all the more interesting.
Let’s see if I can marshall my thoughts on this matter into some semblance of coherency. First off, what is blogging? Google defines it as “the act of creating and publishing content on the internet, typically in the form of articles or posts, on a website or platform known as a blog”. Straightaway, that definition does not state that comments are in any way a mandatory part of blogging. However, posting an article online places it in a public and shared space. The internet is not a void. Quite the contrary. Hence, you may not have or want comments on your blog but by publishing a post that is open to all, you’ve stuck your head above the parapet. Thus you may attract comments, by hook or by crook. Other bloggers can link to your post and write their own reply. Similarly they can reach you via social media if you have allowed it. It is also worth noting that private email comments can be made public.
So there is an inherent social aspect to blogging, whether the blogger expressly desires it or not. If you’re truly blogging just for yourself, there is the option to make your blog private. However, few bloggers do this because most do have a desire on some level for their writing to be read. Therefore it is my opinion that this tangential move to have comments via email or say Mastodon, is a way for the blogger to have greater agency over the process. Because allowing comments on your blog can have negative consequences. There is scope for spam, abusive comments or for your writing to be derided. Not everyone copes with such things well. Plus, all of this can happen in a very public way. That in itself can be a negative factor for some bloggers. I believe that an element of this shift to having comments conducted offsite and possibly privately, stems from a desire to conduct such activities from a safe space.
I like feedback, constructive criticism and exchanging ideas. So I am happy to have comments on Contains Moderate Peril. I apply my own notions of etiquette and manners to comments that have been left and I have no qualms in deleting those that are insulting and unconstructive. I tend not to lay awake at night ruminating on negative feedback left by a few individuals. However, I appreciate that not everyone is wired the same way as me and some folk find these potential aspects of reader comments troubling. Hence, everyone makes a choice that they are comfortable with. If this newer approach works for the blogger in question then so be it. It has also been brought to my attention that comments have never been a cultural expectation with blogs on some subjects. Perhaps my social expectations regarding comments, comes from my gaming background.
I have always felt that my writing is to a degree, a prelude to a discussion. When writing a post, I sometimes won’t cover all available talking points, thus leaving scope for these to be explored in the comments. But again, not everyone holds such a view. I do feel that being confronted with opposite views to your own and then responding to them can be a useful experience. I’d even argue that deleting abusive comments can also teach a valuable lesson. However, the toxic nature of the internet means that some people may not want to countenance such things. Keeping bullshit at arms length is wise, especially if you write in a field that attracts hostility. Being constantly abused is exhausting. However, digging a virtual moat and pulling up the drawbridge has its own consequences.
The fact that I’ve managed to write as much as I have on this subject shows the scope of the discussion surrounding it. Your approach to blog comments is ultimately entirely up to you and you should make your choice accordingly. If you have a static site and integrating comments requires incurring a further cost, then that in itself is a good reason not to have them, if you’re working within a budget. The most important factor is to be content with your decision. I shall make one final point regarding blog comments. Not having them on your blog doesn’t stop people commenting on your writing. They will just discuss your material elsewhere, which is something you have far less say in. The reality is that if you blog publicly, then you cannot truly avoid criticism. Perhaps that should be the first lesson of blogging.
