Roger Edwards 10/30/15 Roger Edwards 10/30/15

Have MMOs Made Me Antisocial?

I started playing my first MMO in late 2008. Until then it was the one genre that I had never tried. I initially considered buying World of Warcraft but when I found out there was a virtual version of Middle-Earth I chose to purchase The Lord of the Rings Online instead. Right from the outset I was hooked. My working pattern and domestic arrangements afforded me plenty of time to invest into this game and I did so willingly.

I can remember one particular evening when I grouped up with two other players who were all attempting the same quest as me. We chatted and got on well together. After successfully clearing our quests we decided to meet up again the following night. Needless to say we continued to group together for the next year or so. At this time the majority of LOTRO’s content required people to play collaboratively. It was not an alien concept but a simple fact of life. The prevailing philosophy of the time was that MMO were all about grouping. The key to advancement was teamwork.

At the time I found that most people were friendly and approachable, so levelling through the game was very much a shared experience. Joining a kinship only enhanced this further. It was also nice to log on to the game, say “hi” to people in kin chat and shoot the breeze. Between November 2008 and December 2009 was one of the most pleasant times I’ve spent gaming. There was always something to do and someone to help. I didn’t see LOTRO as a time sink but as a positive leisure activity.

After the release of Siege of Mirkwood in December 2009, something started to change for me. This was not only due to the LOTRO expansion becoming more solo friendly but also because I started to play other MMOs. In early 2010 I managed to progress through Star Trek Online without the need to belong to a guild. Grouping was done automatically and I noticed for the first time that there was no necessity to play collaboratively in a traditional sense. The chat channel was mainly a platform for flame wars with hardcore fans debating the finer points of the franchise. So I played on my own, ignoring others players and was happy to do so.

And so the rot set in. When LOTRO went free to play in October 2010, it embarked on a radical redevelopment of material. Pursuing the free market and the casual player meant ensuring that content was accessible in easy bite size chunks. Turbine then set about making all prior zones soloable over the next 18 months. From my perspective, people continued to play but unless it involved endgame raiding, grouping became less and less common. Even the kinship I was in became more solo orientated. The common link was the group chat and we still ran instances but most of the time everyone seemed to be doing their own thing.

The benefits of solo orientated gameplay are the same nowadays as they were five years ago. There’s no time wasted organising a group, ensuring that everyone is adequately equipped and briefed; nor is there any dependency on other people’s performance. You simply do what you want, when you want. As a result, expectations increase and tolerance decreases. But there are also some negative side effects. Because you do not need anyone else, it can impact upon your level of your involvement within your guild. There may be a decline in communication. There may also be a decrease in the willingness to help out. Requests are no longer be greeted by multiple volunteers. Everyone is too busy doing their own thing. Altruism is an inconvenience.

The automated grouping of players via dynamic content that we see in Guild Wars 2 and Rift, is easy and seamless. It is also devoid of any meaningful social interaction. Players can pursue their own individual goals and simply tap into the benefits of group participation, as and when they want. When done they can go about their business, without saying a word. It is a curious paradox that sees a server full of people, playing a social game, alone.

Now this situation does not affect everyone, nor am I stating that it is the default position of all players. RP servers or guild based around hardcore raiding, fly in the face of this social decline. I am sure both such parties would strongly argue that they still maintain very high levels of social interaction. Yet I don’t think they represent the majority of the MMO population. Such strong team based dynamics only serve specific niche groups. I also believe that the F2P business model has also contributed to general social decline, with the percentage increase of "problematic" players that join the community. That has a big impact upon how we all interact with each other.

When this issue of social decline is raised, it often provokes emotive and judgemental responses. The gaming genre is steeped in nostalgia. Rightly or wrongly, such perspectives seldom have any impact upon business decisions. Game developers want to keep players engaged and using their products. Should customers be denied access to content and the opportunity to advance due to subjective notions of social interaction? Well the logical answer is no. However this move towards a player base that is following its own personal path, is not without flaws. We often see in-game an increasing amount of people who seem ill equipped to interact socially with others, just as we do in real life. Tolerance, consideration, and patience are abstract concepts to some. Social commentators often talk about the decline in the sense of community in the real world. Do also MMOs reflect this?

I personally have contributed to this shift in MMO culture, especially so with LOTRO. I do tend to focus a lot more on my own gaming needs nowadays, rather than with others in my kin. I argue that I've played my part and done my share in the past. However I think the reality is that I no longer have a dependency on others, so the notion of community spirit is diminished. I’m not saying that this is a good thing and I do have pangs of guilt occasionally and endeavour to be helpful. Ultimately, all kins have givers and takers. I've just moved my position between the two ends of the spectrum in recent years, as have many others.

This beggars the question, was the social heyday of MMO's really ever driven by altruism or purely by necessity? Is this decline in the social aspect of the genre inevitable, or can it be stemmed? I cannot answer these questions and only the future will tell. I do on occasions bump into people in-game who are very civil and helpful. LOTRO does to a degree still seems to be a good example of this, although its crown has slipped in recent years. Yet because group content has been watered down within many games or relegated to an afterthought with many new products, the incentive to communicate and collaborate is greatly reduced.

Whether this all stems from developers just chasing a buck or whether this is a wider reflection of contemporary human nature, I'll let you decide. I do think that MMOs and even the internet itself have lost their capacity to impress. Simply being surrounded by other people online no longer gets the “wow” reaction it did a decade ago. We’re also sadly accepting of the fact that social platforms tend be a race to the bottom these days. It is assumed by default that all online communities will have a percentage of assholes. And then there is the ascendancy of the cult of the individual and “me” culture; these to have impacted upon the concept of social gaming.

For me my personal MMO journey has been a question of time and place. I wanted to be social when I started playing this genre and had the resources to do so. If a new MMO was released tomorrow that had old school grouping mechanics and time requirements, I know for a fact I would not play it. It would be incompatible with my current lifestyle and mindset. Perhaps age is also a factor in this conundrum; the idealism of youth versus the pragmatism of old age.

So is there a conclusion to this discussion? I’m not sure there’s a definitive one. Overall it seems a little unrealistic to blame the developers solely for the decline in social gaming. I think if we’re honest we have to concede that we actively contributed to this situation ourselves. When the move towards solo play started did we complain and lobby as much as we could have? Perhaps the golden age of collaborative play is just a myth. We grouped because we had no choice. Can the situation change? Yes but only if we make it financially viable to do so.

Roger Edwards 10/29/15 Roger Edwards 10/29/15

Star Trek Online: New Dawn

Tuesday saw the release of the eleventh season of Star Trek Online. New Dawn includes not only the latest feature episode Sunrise but also the new admiralty system, a revamp of the Cardassian story arc along with a Badlands battlezone for level sixty players and above. There is also a new Terran Empire rep faction and associated rewards. Now it probably hasn’t escaped anyone’s notice that Cryptic are providing more of the same. However it’s a tried and tested formula so I guess they cannot be blamed for adopting a policy of “if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it”.

After my recent disappointment with the Guild Wars 2 expansion Heart of Thorns, it’s been pleasant to return to the familiar routine of STO. After the conclusion of the Iconian war at the end of the last season, a new storyline based around exploration and first contact is a welcome change of pace. That’s not to say there isn’t any combat involved. It would seem that the Tholians are up to something in this latest episode and once again the plot relies on temporal meddling. As ever the narrative draws upon characters and plot devices from a specific episode of Star Trek: The Next Generation. But this is one of the game’s greatest strengths.

So having played through Sunrise, which I found to be totally agreeable, I decided to check out the new admiralty system. It didn’t take long for me to regret having deleted all the various ships I acquired while levelling. As a result I only have five vessels to use on my primary federation character. Naturally the various low and intermediate level ships that have been languishing on the exchange for months have all now massively increased in value. The system itself which is very similar to the duty officer system, is adequately entertaining but the cool down on missions seems somewhat long.

Although I am currently sharing my time between several MMOs, STO still seems to be the least problematic and trying of them all. It a curious thing that my relationship with this genre has reached a point where I even use such terms. However despite not being the most polished of MMOs, STO still manages to satisfy and engage. The IP is a major contributory factor and the game is extremely functional. Too many games creak under the weight of their own complexity. I suspect that STO will remain installed on my PC for the immediate future, whereas certain other titles may well have out lived there usefulness.

Roger Edwards 9/22/15 Roger Edwards 9/22/15

Gold Sellers

Having returned to several MMOs recently, I have been surprised to see that gold selling is still quite common place. Purveyors of these and other dubious services still regularly spam the in-game chat channels of games such as Star Trek Online and Guild Wars 2. I would hazard a guess that games based on single server environments amplify the hawking of such wares. I have not seen such messages on the Gilrain server where I play LOTRO for several years. However it is clear that gold selling is still a “thing” within this genre, irrespective of my surprise.

One of the commonest issues facing a new player of MMO, is a shortfall of in-game gold. There are game mechanics in place in most games of this genre that allow you to legitimately amass a sizeable personal fortune but they require time. Therein lies the problem. Long term players at endgame frequently have a substantial supply of gold that ceases to have any major benefit for them. Gold is often most required midway through the levelling process. Having recently returned to both STO and Guild Wars 2, I’ve found that I am spending the respective in-game currency on upgraded gear as fast as I earn it.

Now this is exactly the sort of scenario that could potentially encourage some players to use the services of a gold seller. Let us not waste time on any moral debates about such vendors; that is another blog post all together. I and many other people have used gold sellers in the past as a convenient means to an end. However with the advent of free to play games and the common practise of using multiple in-game currencies, surely the financial benefits of using gold sellers has fallen by the wayside? Simply put, are such services value for money?

Let us use STO as an example. Perfect World sells Zen for use in the C-Store, where players can by ships, commodities, buffs and boost and all the usual trinkets and baubles you find in a MMO. Recently I bought 5300 Zen for £32 (€45, $49). I then spent 5250 Zen buying 46 lock box keys (4 x pack of 10 and 6 individual keys). At the time keys were selling on the in-game exchange for 2.6 million Energy Credits. Within one hour of posting the keys they had all sold for a total of119,600,00 Energy Credits. This may sound like a lot but high end items can sell for 10 to 15 million Energy Credits or more. However if spent prudently this is a reasonable war chest for a new player.

So to summarise, I effectively spent £32 for nearly 120 million energy credits, using legitimate game processes. However a Google search not only yields the names of the most popular gold sellers online but also lists a gold selling comparison site. MMOBux provides quite a comprehensive service, with reviews of gold sellers and price tracking. It’s both mind boggling and yet perfectly logical that site such as this should exist. Using the comparison site I determined at the time that MMOGA could source 120 million Energy Credits for £27 where Koala Credits could supply the required amount for £93.

It would appear that it is more cost effective and safer to buy in-game currency in STO via Perfect World, rather than take your chances with these third party vendors. It’s a similar story with Guild Wars 2 as they allows players to purchase gems and convert them directly in-game into gold, via a server wide exchange mechanism. At present you can safely buy in-game, 2800 gems for £30 and convert them to 532 gold. Again the third party gold sellers cannot really undercut the official tariff and therefore can only offer an equivalent price.

So based on these two examples, why is gold selling still a “thing” in the MMO genre? Why would anyone be willing to risk losing their currency order, just for a negligible saving (and assuming there is one)? It’s an interesting question because obviously people still use these dubious services as my Google search showed. I think like most questions the answer is complex rather than binary. I get the impression that a lot of players haven’t stopped and done the maths, so don’t realise they can get in-game gold legitimately and without risk. I also think that gold selling advertising is a bit like supermarket special offers. When you actually crunch the numbers there isn't actually a deal to be had but you are distinctly given the impression that there is one. Also third party gold sellers probably don’t care too much about whether the customer is actually the owner of the credit card being used.

As there is no significant advantage to buying gold from third party outlets, you would think that players would prefer to use the legitimate services associated with many games. MMOs have operating costs so spending money directly via the developers helps support the game and its future growth. Gold sellers drain money from this revenue stream which is ultimately damaging, not only for the game but for the player as well. All things considered there shouldn't really be any reason why gold selling is still a “thing” in 2015. Perhaps if more players took time out to consider the matter, such services would become obsolete.

Roger Edwards 8/5/15 Roger Edwards 8/5/15

DPS Meters – The Gateway Drug of Gaming?

DPS meters are often perceived as being controversial and divisive, especially in the MMO community. Like most tools the problem doesn’t lie with its function but how it is used. A claw hammer is not inherently evil per se but it can be used to bludgeon your Grandma to death. Similarly DPS meters provide data which can be used either positively or negatively. They can inform and prompt change or they can be used as a means of segregation and discrimination.

DPS meters are often perceived as being controversial and divisive, especially in the MMO community. Like most tools the problem doesn't lie with its function but how it is used. A claw hammer is not inherently evil per se but it can be used to bludgeon your Grandma to death. Similarly DPS meters provide data which can be used either positively or negatively. They can inform and prompt change or they can be used as a means of segregation and discrimination.

After returning to Star Trek Online in April, I’ve currently hit the proverbial MMO sweet spot. My primary Federation character is at level cap and has full reputation with all factions. I’m currently experimenting with different Tier 6 ships builds and having great fun. That is to say I was, until I read an article last week about achieving 10K DPS within the game. Alas this set off a chain of events that lead me to installing a Combat Log Reader; a decision that very nearly derailed my enjoyment of STO.

Measuring ones DPS output in a game is similar to measuring the length one’s own penis *. Both start from a position of excessive optimism and over expectation and end in disappointment and hurt pride. Let it suffice to say I was expecting to have numbers of about 5K DPS on some of my ships in STO. After running the DPS meter across multiple vessels and alts, this turned out not to be the case. What happened next is a curious thing. Instead of trying to determine what the average figures where for a casual player; something that would've soothed my injured pride because they are quite low, I jumped straight into the deep end. I mean why have a measured response when knee-jerk reactions are far more fashionable?

So I started to peruse the back waters of Reddit, where people share intricate, esoteric starship builds and a love of anal retention. This lead me to conclude that there were equipment and console sets that I needed to procure, that were only available from the reputation crafting system. Such gear cannot be obtained quickly and requires a great deal of resources and grinding. I soon realised that such an undertaking would require a lot of logistical management. If only there was some way to keep track of it all; a spreadsheet perhaps?

I have stood on the edge of the abyss and I have looked in. As I did so the words of Merlin (Nicol Williamson) from the movie Excalibur rang in my ears. “Look into the eyes of the Dragon and despair”. Mercifully common sense prevailed and I managed to prevent myself from stepping into the void at the last moment. I passed the test. I will diminish, and go into a nursing home and remain moderately perilous.

Hyperbole and self-indulgent jokes aside, this entire episode did reveal some interesting aspects about gaming, my competitive nature and the culture associated with DPS meters. There is nothing wrong with min-maxing. Seeking personal satisfaction in achieving a high DPS output and being top of a league table are valid pursuits. They are not however the preserve of all players. I very quickly realised that chasing above average DPS required a lot of time and effort and that undertaking such a task would kill my enjoyment of the game. I fortunately recognised this before I embarked upon a very self-destructive course of action.

Now the title of this post is meant humorously. I’m not positing a serious academic question; merely pointing out that a simple chain of events did divert me from my somewhat placid and laid back approach to gaming. This story is based upon my experiences in Star Trek Online but it is easily applicable to many other MMOs. Usually I’m not a fan of “ignorance is bliss” policies but with regard to casual gaming, if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it. If you’re happy with your character build in a game, can happily undertake PVE content and have no desire to enter into an arduous competition with yourself and others then don’t ever install a DPS meter (or measure intimate parts of your anatomy). You’ll be far happier.

*This is a very male-centric metaphor. I don’t believe there’s a female equivalent. It’s just some strange facet of biological specific psychology and social conditioning. I wouldn’t be surprised if the bulk of gamers that use DPS meters and seek to be the “best” are male.