Roger Edwards 11/15/15 Roger Edwards 11/15/15

How to Explain Your Passion for Gaming to a Non-Gamer

Gaming is a pastime that is still viewed with scepticism by many people and gamers per se still endure a lot of bad press from those who like to perpetuate lazy stereotypes. If you are a well-adjusted gamer who enjoys gainful employment and a healthy social life, you may find yourself at some point having to explain your passion. Furthermore it could be to people who find your hobby utterly alien. Like most things in life there is no easy solution and there are numerous approaches to tackling such a line of enquiry.

The most logical starting point may be to give any curious third party a verbal overview on the merits of gaming; to attempt to convey the very things that you find engaging about gaming. However fans often cannot see the woods for the trees, so there’s a good chance that this approach could result in a lengthy diatribe, which fails in its good intentions and leaves one of the two individuals involved with their eyes glazed over. Can you guess which one?

Another approach may be to try and introduce this fictitious friend who is curious about gaming to some of the professional games coverage that is provided by the wider press. Mind you, this also comes with its own set of problems, as some of it can be very esoteric and niche market. It may only further bewilder and confuse, rather than illuminate. Plus the games media itself can at times be extremely blinkered and unwelcoming.

Overall I think the best way is to show the benefits of gaming. By that I don’t mean just demonstrate one of your favourite titles but how you personally experience it. Highlight the positive aspects of gaming that are common to other hobbies and pastimes, such as the social interactions and the friendships. A great example is the associated blogging community that stems from gaming. Many other hobbies have similar support networks and social portals. Perhaps the most obvious parallel that can be invoked is that of sports fandom. Demonstrating the common ground between the two may well prove beneficial.

The key is to break the stereotype of the gamer being an antisocial person indulging in something that has negative connotations. This is where the growth in casual gaming can work as a stepping stone between those who habitually game and those who do not. I’m not saying that the above is a comprehensive guide. As ever with human interaction, you need to adjust your pitch according to the situation. Yet if each of us manages to change at least ones persons mind about gaming, perhaps we can finally dispel some of the myths that still linger.

Roger Edwards 11/13/15 Roger Edwards 11/13/15

Star Trek Online - Hearts and Minds

Star Trek is no stranger to the supernatural. The original series featured two episodes written by the reknown horror author Robert Bloch, namely "Catspaw" and "Wolf in the fold". Both of which nicely contrasted the shows central science based theme with elements of the paranormal. So I was pleased to see today that Cryptic were making the episode "Hearts and Minds" available in Star Trek Online, for a short 36 hour window to celebrate Friday the 13th. It’s a suitably atmospheric and cautionary tale which compliments the traditional story lines we see in STO. The story takes place in the Donatu sector of the Eta Eridani sector block, at a lunar research station in the Donatu system. Franklin Drake bestows the mission, thus suggesting that all is not as it seems.

I've lost contact with an old . . . colleague. Doctor Sibak was a Vulcan priest, but he worked with the Vulcan science academy studying psionic phenomena. A few years ago he went into seclusion on a remote research station in the Donatu system. He hasn't been heard from in some time. I'd like someone to check up on him. Don't worry, He's just a typical Vulcan by himself. You shouldn't have any problems.

But of course there are. "Hearts and Minds" is a mini-mission that explores the consequences of Doctor Sibaks's unconventional research gone awry. This mission is a “story in one act,” and can easily be completed. It is enjoyably atmospheric in a creepy way. Missions initiated by Franklin Drake are always duplicitous and it is an interesting plot device to see a Vulcan character stray so radically from the path of logic. "Hearts and Minds" also rewards players with a unique duty officer upon completion. Not everyone is a fan of time restricted content but I like these episodes that only appear on specific occasions. If you cannot play through this particular mission during its current window of opportunity, you can rest assured that it will be available again in the future.

Roger Edwards 11/12/15 Roger Edwards 11/12/15

The Evolving Definition of MMORPG

A post over at Massively Overpowered postulated the question is an MMORPG still an MMORPG without gear progression? As you can imagine a broad debate ensued and at present there are over two hundred comments on the matter. I’m not going to debate the specifics of this particular question but would rather consider the following notion. That the term MMORPG is not immutable and has indeed evolved beyond its traditional definition. Furthermore unless some gamers embrace the concept of adaptive gaming semantics then they will continue to find themselves at odds with the prevailing ideas that are currently driving game developers.

Back in the heyday of Ultima Online the term Massively Multiplayer Online Role Playing Game had a very specific meaning that reflected the game mechanics and social requirements of the genre. For better or for worse that definition is no longer applicable. Today the MMORPG is a far broader church where players can pursue common goals collectively or on their own depending on their personal choice. Gear grinds, endgame raiding and mechanics such as the Holy Trinity are no longer essential to the genre. The formula for an MMORPG is now far more flexible, like the recipe for Chicken Tikka Masala or General Tso’s Chicken.

Yet many gamers have their personal perspective of the MMO shaped by their point of entry in to the genre. As a result a form of gaming first contact takes places that creates a rather entrenched mindset and a resistance to change. However games are first and foremost a business and market forces are there primary driving factor. Developers therefore will pursue whatever they consider to be financially viable options. Thus change is inevitable as well as desire able. Do we simply want a market saturated with identical products?

Change can be upsetting at times, especially if you feel it is to your personal detriment. Yet to resist it is ultimately futile. New players and revenue streams outweigh any loss from those who are unhappy. Gamers who want things to remain the same will eventually exile themselves from the very genre they enjoy. Is that a superior choice to trying something different, adapting and accepting change? I have an elderly relation who still obstinately refers to Zimbabwe as Rhodesia, due to some archaic world view that is now obsolete. All they really do by maintaining this stance is isolate themselves from others and look foolish. One could argue that those who stick rigidly to their own definition of the MMORPG are doing the same.

Roger Edwards 11/8/15 Roger Edwards 11/8/15

Classic Game Themes: Arcania - Gothic 4

Dynamedion are an award winning company and team of composers based in Germany. They specialize in soundtracks and game compositions, usually in the orchestral form. Over the years they have produced both musical scores and ambient sound designs for such titles as Ryse: Son of Rome, The Elder Scrolls Online and the Gothic series. Tilman Sillescu is both the co-founder of Dynamedion, as well as a prodigious composer in his own right. He previously taught at Mainz University. As Lead Composer and Creative Director at Dynamedion GbR, he has scored many exciting video game projects as well as writing and producing music for movie trailers, television and libraries.

The score for Arcania: Gothic 4 contains both ambient and thematic tracks which enrich the gameplay and overall atmosphere. The cue I have chosen plays over the games end credits and is listed on the games soundtrack CD as "credits song". It is an initially sombre piece that grows in power ending in a triumphant crescendo of brass. The vocalisation adds a semi-religious quality to the track and overall feels somewhat like a requiem. This particular music cue was written by Tilman Sillescu himself and is indicative of the level of quality that Dynamedion produce.

Roger Edwards 11/7/15 Roger Edwards 11/7/15

Gamer Spends $30,000 on Star Citizen

Over at PCGamer there’s an interview with a Star Citizen fan by the name of Chris (AKA Ozy311) who has to date spent $30,000 on the game. He owns all items that are currently available via the game store. Furthermore he has implied that he will continue to spend money on Star Citizen as more content become available. It would appear that Chris is an ardent gamer and has no concerns spending such sums of money on virtual products in a game that is still under development. Judging from the interview it seems that he has a well-paid job and is therefore simply exercising his right to spend his money how he sees fit.

What I find fascinating about this story is not that a gamer has spent such a sum of money but the way the gaming community has reacted to this revelation. The comments section over at PCGamer (as well as on other similar sites) is rife with statements and value judgements based on limited data and the application of subjective personal morals. There is also a lot of bitterness and jealousy, as well as the usual straw man and ad hominem arguments that are de rigueur in such discussions. It would appear that some gamers are very unhappy with someone spending their own money in a particular way, but they’re not particularly good at articulating what they specifically object to.

When someone decides to place their personal activities in the public domain, they are courting opinion, be it directly or indirectly and they will have their actions judged. However beyond the facts, there really is no more to this story than what first meets the eye. Chris is a fan spending money on his particular passion. His expenditure is relative to his income. From what I’ve read he’s is not in any way negatively affecting anyone else with his purchases. The only unusual aspect of this whole affair is the relatively new concept of buying virtual goods and services. If Chris had bought a yacht he would still have one, irrespective of whether the manufacture ceased trading.

Once again I find that a percentage of the gamers seem to have a curious puritanical streak. As ever a lot of people’s personal opinions seem to be based upon nothing more than how they initially feel, rather than a logical analysis and measured consideration of the data. However that is something that we cannot lay exclusively at the door of the gaming community as it seems rife in every other social aspect of life. Perhaps I just notice the volume of white noise associated with gaming because I have an interest in it; I’m sure there’s just as much among sports fans. In the meantime it will be interesting to see if Star Citizen continues to attract such “big spenders”. I wouldn’t be surprised if it does.

Roger Edwards 11/3/15 Roger Edwards 11/3/15

Activision Blizzard Buys King Digital Entertainment

I found out about Activision Blizzard’s acquisition of King Digital Entertainment via the BBC Business website. From my perspective the notion of a leading US games developer that has a foothold in all major markets, buying in to the mobile sector hardly comes as a surprise. The price is perhaps the main talking point and does raise the question of the potential over valuing tech based companies. $5.9 Billion is after all a tidy sum of money. However what this deal does prove is the financial importance of the mobile gaming market.

Gaming like many other pastimes has a social hierarchy among its fan base, which is rife with preconceptions, snobbery and self-aggrandisement. For many mobile gaming is still frowned upon and considered in some quarters not to be “proper” gaming. There will be a wealth of blog posts and commentary about this business deal, decrying it as foolhardy. A popular refrain will be how the money could be better spent producing a particular product that specific fans want. This is the nature of fandom; a tunnel vision perspective driven by one’s own desires.

The reality of the situation is very simple. Mobile gaming, irrespective of its perceived artistic and creative merits, is an extremely lucrative business. Therefore the opinion of those who are not part of the existing customer base is hardly of any major significance to developers. Those with entrenched views are hardly likely to succumb to marketing and therefore cease to be of any importance in any ongoing promotional campaign. Sadly logic seldom has any impact upon the white noise generated by “core gamers”.

Over time I have become increasingly more interested in the business side of the gaming industry. It is as fluid and intriguing as any other global market. Compared to the emotive and often self-absorbed tirades I see coming from the gaming community, the machinations of companies such as Activision Blizzard are far more interesting. This simply highlights the gulf between business and the imperatives of the market compared to the capricious nature of fans aspirations. Am I growing out of gaming? No but I may well be growing out of the community.

Roger Edwards 10/30/15 Roger Edwards 10/30/15

Have MMOs Made Me Antisocial?

I started playing my first MMO in late 2008. Until then it was the one genre that I had never tried. I initially considered buying World of Warcraft but when I found out there was a virtual version of Middle-Earth I chose to purchase The Lord of the Rings Online instead. Right from the outset I was hooked. My working pattern and domestic arrangements afforded me plenty of time to invest into this game and I did so willingly.

I can remember one particular evening when I grouped up with two other players who were all attempting the same quest as me. We chatted and got on well together. After successfully clearing our quests we decided to meet up again the following night. Needless to say we continued to group together for the next year or so. At this time the majority of LOTRO’s content required people to play collaboratively. It was not an alien concept but a simple fact of life. The prevailing philosophy of the time was that MMO were all about grouping. The key to advancement was teamwork.

At the time I found that most people were friendly and approachable, so levelling through the game was very much a shared experience. Joining a kinship only enhanced this further. It was also nice to log on to the game, say “hi” to people in kin chat and shoot the breeze. Between November 2008 and December 2009 was one of the most pleasant times I’ve spent gaming. There was always something to do and someone to help. I didn’t see LOTRO as a time sink but as a positive leisure activity.

After the release of Siege of Mirkwood in December 2009, something started to change for me. This was not only due to the LOTRO expansion becoming more solo friendly but also because I started to play other MMOs. In early 2010 I managed to progress through Star Trek Online without the need to belong to a guild. Grouping was done automatically and I noticed for the first time that there was no necessity to play collaboratively in a traditional sense. The chat channel was mainly a platform for flame wars with hardcore fans debating the finer points of the franchise. So I played on my own, ignoring others players and was happy to do so.

And so the rot set in. When LOTRO went free to play in October 2010, it embarked on a radical redevelopment of material. Pursuing the free market and the casual player meant ensuring that content was accessible in easy bite size chunks. Turbine then set about making all prior zones soloable over the next 18 months. From my perspective, people continued to play but unless it involved endgame raiding, grouping became less and less common. Even the kinship I was in became more solo orientated. The common link was the group chat and we still ran instances but most of the time everyone seemed to be doing their own thing.

The benefits of solo orientated gameplay are the same nowadays as they were five years ago. There’s no time wasted organising a group, ensuring that everyone is adequately equipped and briefed; nor is there any dependency on other people’s performance. You simply do what you want, when you want. As a result, expectations increase and tolerance decreases. But there are also some negative side effects. Because you do not need anyone else, it can impact upon your level of your involvement within your guild. There may be a decline in communication. There may also be a decrease in the willingness to help out. Requests are no longer be greeted by multiple volunteers. Everyone is too busy doing their own thing. Altruism is an inconvenience.

The automated grouping of players via dynamic content that we see in Guild Wars 2 and Rift, is easy and seamless. It is also devoid of any meaningful social interaction. Players can pursue their own individual goals and simply tap into the benefits of group participation, as and when they want. When done they can go about their business, without saying a word. It is a curious paradox that sees a server full of people, playing a social game, alone.

Now this situation does not affect everyone, nor am I stating that it is the default position of all players. RP servers or guild based around hardcore raiding, fly in the face of this social decline. I am sure both such parties would strongly argue that they still maintain very high levels of social interaction. Yet I don’t think they represent the majority of the MMO population. Such strong team based dynamics only serve specific niche groups. I also believe that the F2P business model has also contributed to general social decline, with the percentage increase of "problematic" players that join the community. That has a big impact upon how we all interact with each other.

When this issue of social decline is raised, it often provokes emotive and judgemental responses. The gaming genre is steeped in nostalgia. Rightly or wrongly, such perspectives seldom have any impact upon business decisions. Game developers want to keep players engaged and using their products. Should customers be denied access to content and the opportunity to advance due to subjective notions of social interaction? Well the logical answer is no. However this move towards a player base that is following its own personal path, is not without flaws. We often see in-game an increasing amount of people who seem ill equipped to interact socially with others, just as we do in real life. Tolerance, consideration, and patience are abstract concepts to some. Social commentators often talk about the decline in the sense of community in the real world. Do also MMOs reflect this?

I personally have contributed to this shift in MMO culture, especially so with LOTRO. I do tend to focus a lot more on my own gaming needs nowadays, rather than with others in my kin. I argue that I've played my part and done my share in the past. However I think the reality is that I no longer have a dependency on others, so the notion of community spirit is diminished. I’m not saying that this is a good thing and I do have pangs of guilt occasionally and endeavour to be helpful. Ultimately, all kins have givers and takers. I've just moved my position between the two ends of the spectrum in recent years, as have many others.

This beggars the question, was the social heyday of MMO's really ever driven by altruism or purely by necessity? Is this decline in the social aspect of the genre inevitable, or can it be stemmed? I cannot answer these questions and only the future will tell. I do on occasions bump into people in-game who are very civil and helpful. LOTRO does to a degree still seems to be a good example of this, although its crown has slipped in recent years. Yet because group content has been watered down within many games or relegated to an afterthought with many new products, the incentive to communicate and collaborate is greatly reduced.

Whether this all stems from developers just chasing a buck or whether this is a wider reflection of contemporary human nature, I'll let you decide. I do think that MMOs and even the internet itself have lost their capacity to impress. Simply being surrounded by other people online no longer gets the “wow” reaction it did a decade ago. We’re also sadly accepting of the fact that social platforms tend be a race to the bottom these days. It is assumed by default that all online communities will have a percentage of assholes. And then there is the ascendancy of the cult of the individual and “me” culture; these to have impacted upon the concept of social gaming.

For me my personal MMO journey has been a question of time and place. I wanted to be social when I started playing this genre and had the resources to do so. If a new MMO was released tomorrow that had old school grouping mechanics and time requirements, I know for a fact I would not play it. It would be incompatible with my current lifestyle and mindset. Perhaps age is also a factor in this conundrum; the idealism of youth versus the pragmatism of old age.

So is there a conclusion to this discussion? I’m not sure there’s a definitive one. Overall it seems a little unrealistic to blame the developers solely for the decline in social gaming. I think if we’re honest we have to concede that we actively contributed to this situation ourselves. When the move towards solo play started did we complain and lobby as much as we could have? Perhaps the golden age of collaborative play is just a myth. We grouped because we had no choice. Can the situation change? Yes but only if we make it financially viable to do so.

Roger Edwards 10/29/15 Roger Edwards 10/29/15

Star Trek Online: New Dawn

Tuesday saw the release of the eleventh season of Star Trek Online. New Dawn includes not only the latest feature episode Sunrise but also the new admiralty system, a revamp of the Cardassian story arc along with a Badlands battlezone for level sixty players and above. There is also a new Terran Empire rep faction and associated rewards. Now it probably hasn’t escaped anyone’s notice that Cryptic are providing more of the same. However it’s a tried and tested formula so I guess they cannot be blamed for adopting a policy of “if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it”.

After my recent disappointment with the Guild Wars 2 expansion Heart of Thorns, it’s been pleasant to return to the familiar routine of STO. After the conclusion of the Iconian war at the end of the last season, a new storyline based around exploration and first contact is a welcome change of pace. That’s not to say there isn’t any combat involved. It would seem that the Tholians are up to something in this latest episode and once again the plot relies on temporal meddling. As ever the narrative draws upon characters and plot devices from a specific episode of Star Trek: The Next Generation. But this is one of the game’s greatest strengths.

So having played through Sunrise, which I found to be totally agreeable, I decided to check out the new admiralty system. It didn’t take long for me to regret having deleted all the various ships I acquired while levelling. As a result I only have five vessels to use on my primary federation character. Naturally the various low and intermediate level ships that have been languishing on the exchange for months have all now massively increased in value. The system itself which is very similar to the duty officer system, is adequately entertaining but the cool down on missions seems somewhat long.

Although I am currently sharing my time between several MMOs, STO still seems to be the least problematic and trying of them all. It a curious thing that my relationship with this genre has reached a point where I even use such terms. However despite not being the most polished of MMOs, STO still manages to satisfy and engage. The IP is a major contributory factor and the game is extremely functional. Too many games creak under the weight of their own complexity. I suspect that STO will remain installed on my PC for the immediate future, whereas certain other titles may well have out lived there usefulness.

Roger Edwards 10/28/15 Roger Edwards 10/28/15

Heart of Thorns

In recent years I have made it my policy not to participate in beta testing of major new MMOs, nor to immerse myself in their marketing leading up to release. I don’t want to risk getting burnt out or build up too many unrealistic or erroneous expectations. Overall I want there to be an element of surprise when I finally around to playing a new product. Naturally I applied this philosophy to the Guild Wars 2 expansion Heart of Thorns and have made it my business to ignore a lot of the press, live streams and hype over the last quarter. So when I finally logged in today I didn’t really know what to expect. On mature reflection this was a mistake.

The first thing that struck me about Heart of Thorns was how non-specific the quest tracker was in telling me where to go to access the expansion’s prologue. I needed to visit an area called The Silverwastes and had no idea where to go. I mistakenly assumed it was via the region of Dry Top which was added to the game with The Living Story Season 2. It took an hour to discover my mistake. I finally tabbed out of the game and did a Google search only to discover there was a portal in Fort Vandal. I always feel that having to leave a game to find necessary information is a major design flaw.

On arriving in The Silverwastes I happened upon a zerg that was going to the area I required. I was so busy trying to keep up that I failed to pay as much attention to the world around me as I should have. So it wasn’t until I reached the Verdant Brink region that I realised that Heart of Thorns is based heavily around a vertical gaming environment. This means that there is frequently no direct path to locations on the map. Furthermore many features essential to the game such as hero points are placed in elevated areas. Thus the game once again makes use of jumping mechanics as well as the newly introduced gliding skill.

I loathe jumping as a gaming mechanic. I lack the manual dexterity required to undertake it as well as the patience to persevere when I fail. Simply put if I had known in advance that this was a major part of Heart of Thorns I wouldn’t have purchased it. I play games for fun and this does not constitute as such by my yardstick. This is the exact same reason why I never finished any of the second season of The Living Story. That also had a dependency upon power ups to conduct jumps, slides and rolls to access specific areas. It is the reason why two outstanding hero points remain beyond my reach to this day.

Needless to say my interest in Heart of Thorns waned massively after discovering the nature of the expansion. I managed to unlock the gliding skill but wasn’t very impressed by that either. Until further upgrades are unlocked it remains nothing more than a glorified drogue shoot. As for the actual plot of Heart of Thorns I have never been a Guild wars 2 lore aficionado. I therefore have no clue as to what is going on and little investment in the characters that I interact with. Therefore I doubt if I Guild Wars 2 will still be on my PC by Christmas. However I have no one but myself to blame for this situation, having fallen victim of my own gaming practises.

Roger Edwards 10/25/15 Roger Edwards 10/25/15

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt and Humour

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is not a game that strikes you as being light hearted at first glance. The plot is dour and brooding, set in a world of human (and non-human) misery and suffering. In many respects this is one of the game’s greatest assets because it’s all so worryingly plausible. The rich and powerful pursue their own goals, heedless of the cost to the rest the kingdom. Those at the very lowest strata of society live a precarious existence. Despite its fantasy setting the world of the Witcher is not that different from our own.

However despite the overall tone of The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, there are instances of humour to be found. Often these are discretely integrated in to the game via snatches of incidental dialogue, cryptic entries in the games bestiary or via the village notice boards. As ever with these sorts of things, the writers reference popular culture. However in this instance, CD Projekt RED proves to be more scholarly than other developers. Many of the quips, asides and homages refer to classical literature and scientific theory.

So here are four examples that I’ve found so far during my play though. I’m sure there are many more. All raised a wry smile when discovered and I now make it my business to trawl through all aspects of the game in pursuit of further hidden gems. Its embellishments such as these that add further depth and character to The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt. If only other developers took such time and care as CD Projekt RED.

A droll reference toErwin Schrödinger's famous thought experiment

Someone obviously likes the work of Herman Mellville

A scholarly homage to Homer (not Simpson)

Roger Edwards 10/23/15 Roger Edwards 10/23/15

Gaming Communities

Fans are far more than just customers. Sadly not all of the gaming industry understands or more importantly appreciates this distinction. Consider this analogy; I am a customer of Vodafone. I use their services for a monthly fee and that is the extent of my relationship with them. I do not write about my experiences using their products, nor do I create guides regarding their use. Neither do I arrange social events around their services. Fans conversely do all these things for the games that they love. Furthermore they do not do these things solely for their own benefit. There is a lot of ultraism in fandom. It often contributes towards a vibrant community which is a great marketing and promotional asset for any games developer. Being free, it also has the best price.

Communities often arise organically, with fans creating websites, podcasts or live streams. Bridges are built with other likeminded individuals and informal networks develop. Cross promotion and collaboration stems from such affiliations. Often specific groups or individuals gain prominence within these social groups, through their own hard work, dedication and content creation. More often than not these figureheads have not actively sought such a position. It simply occurs through the dynamics of human interaction.

Now this raises some interesting questions. Do such high profile individuals or groups have a burden of responsibility? As so called digital ambassadors is there a need for greater self-regulation? I believe there is to a degree. Creating guides, sharing experiences or collating data are benign and neutral undertakings. Providing news or opinion is far more complex and does require responsibility and self-moderation. However there is also a reciprocal requirement that those who read specific sites or follow certain individuals should exercise their common sense. It is a mistake to put people on pedestals.

In the past gaming communities have usually evolved independently of the commercial entities that run the games. Many resources reside outside of the official forums. For more recent titles such as Guild Wars 2, this process has been more centralised under the auspices of the developers. Information and content created by players but it is more often than not it is found within the official forums for that title. I may be wrong but I have never been aware of either SWTOR or Guild Wars 2 having the same sort of independent community as such titles as LOTRO or WoW. Fan based resources can be a great asset but when they reside within the purview of the developers or publishers then there is scope for problems.

In recent years many niche areas of fandom have grown in appeal. This usually happens when an activity or pastime gains mainstream attention and becomes more widely accessible. Cosplay for example is something that in recent years has become increasingly popular. It is no longer perceived as the prerogative of a small niche group and is beginning to become quite a major marketing and promotional tool. Some perceive this process as democratisation, where others see something they love being usurped by those that simply wish to exploit it for financial gain. Is the community simply growing or is it being reinvented at the expense of some and the advantage of others?

Fandoms and the resulting communities can be socially complex and highly fluid. They also seem to have distinct life cycles. With regard to gaming there most certainly is an expiry date for most communities. The natural attrition we have seen in the case of LOTRO and its fan base is a perfectly normal thing, linked to the games lifespan and individuals ongoing engagement. However during a community’s lifecycle, many players benefit from the services that are provided, via guides, podcasts and events. However it should be noted that the opposite can also occur. Dedication and enthusiasm can turn to bitterness and distain. Some forums and blogs maintain a very adversarial relationship with the former object of their affection.

Involvement in a community has its ups and downs and can be very hard work. However the rewards and the pleasure that it brings can outweigh any negatives. So I advocate involvement and participation for those who can. This can take all manner of forms. It is not mandatory that all blog, podcast or live stream. Just reading, supporting and expressing an opinion is a positive contribution. It is also prudent to temper ones emotional investment in such communities as nothing lasts indefinitely. Fan sites and podcasts come and go, as do the games, TV shows and source material that drive them.

Roger Edwards 10/19/15 Roger Edwards 10/19/15

Classic Game Themes: Pirates of the Flying Fortress

Over the past few years I have been regularly writing about Classic Movie Themes and posting specific music cues that I particularly enjoy. Often the term “classic” is not necessarily applicable and it may be more appropriate to simply label them personal favourites. However “classic” is a better fit for headlines and search engines, so I shall continue to use that title. I’ve subsequently decided to post music from the games soundtracks that I feel are of note. The gaming industry has a multitude of talented composers and musicians who enhance games and bring virtual worlds to life with their ambient music and scores.

Pirates of the Flying Fortress is a curious expansion pack, in so far that it’s actually an improvement on the original game, Two Worlds II. The game includes a simple sailing mechanic that adds an extremely enjoyable dimension to the proceedings. Furthermore it is accompanied by a appropriately nautical theme by Borislav “Glorian” Slavov and Victor Stoyanov, which adds an ambient seafaring undercurrent while navigating between islands and archipelagos featured in the game. The scores for both main game and expansion are strong and subtly different from traditional game soundtracks, favouring ambient pieces instead of reoccurring leitmotifs.

Pirates of the Flying Fortress is clever example of understated, low-key game composing. The music seamlessly fits with the narrative and provides an aural enhancement, rather than directly reflecting ongoing events with specific themes. There is an emphasis upon ambient ethnic or folk related tracks which add greatly to the atmosphere. There is also a broad range of instrumentation used to craft the soundcape. It’s a robust soundtrack in the context of the game. However some cues such as “Sails and Journeys” do have a pleasing quality to them that works outside of the game.

Roger Edwards 10/15/15 Roger Edwards 10/15/15

Uninstalling Games

I’ve recently started reclaiming space on my hard drive and have subsequently started a gaming purge. Contemporary games are often very large and it doesn’t take long for a few titles to monopolise your storage capacity. As fickle gamers we can fall out of love with a game very quickly making these large client installations redundant. It’s a curious thing but the entire process of removing a game from your PC is quite therapeutic. It can be similar to bidding a fond farewell to a dear friend, or wiping some offending matter from the sole of your shoe. It all comes down to how you feel about the game in question.

At present I have seventy eight games linked to my Steam account and a further dozen that run independently or via other platforms such as origin or Uplay. Yet out of those one hundred titles I currently have just seven installed. The only one that I’m actively playing at present is The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, although I do check in once a week with LOTRO, STO and Guild Wars 2. It seems quite ironic that despite having a substantial collection of content to draw upon, very little of it is actually being used. I’ll probably never play at least half of the games that I have.

I guess this cavalier attitude reflects a broader change in gaming. Apart from pre-ordering and earlier adoption, gaming is no longer the premium priced pastime that it use to be. The vast majority of my gaming library is made up of titles that have been bought as discount bundles. Pricing does affect how a product is perceived and cheap games do smack of disposable items. A £75 pound investment usually garners some perseverance. A £2 pound game that fails to engage is given short thrift. My Steam library is somewhat akin to my sock draw, populated mainly by cheap and easily replaceable items.

I’ve reclaimed about two hundred gigabytes of disk space by uninstalling these games. As I stated earlier this has been more of a psychological exercise in “house cleaning” rather than a genuine search for more storage. It’s not as if hard drives are especially expensive these days. What remains to be seen is whether I replace these games with other discount titles that I won’t play over the remainder of the year. I suspect that I’ll be conducting this process again in spring.

Roger Edwards 10/11/15 Roger Edwards 10/11/15

MMO Loyalty

I was toying with the idea logging in to The Secret World today. There’s been a lot of internet chatter about the game of late, mainly due to Funcom’s ongoing woes. I was smitten with a mixture of nostalgia regarding the game, especially the quality of its storytelling. Just for a fraction of a second I felt bad for not having played for a long time and even considered my current liking for other MMOs to be disloyal. However I quickly realised that such thinking is nonsensical and was reminded of the old adage about time being a finite quantity. The fact remains that you cannot play everything you’d like to. However I’m sure I’m not alone in having such thoughts and it got me thinking about the entire subject of MMO loyalty.

As gamers we do have a very curious relationship with the object of our affection. Despite games being consumer products, they’re seldom seen in such terms. Many prefer to imbue them with a greater sense of meaning than they actually have or develop a curious adulation of those involved in their creation. Because so many players are invested in wider activities associated with MMOs, there is a tendency to see the game as the source of these social interactions rather than just a conduit. However it cannot be denied that the very nature of MMOs brings people together. Guilds are the source of many a friendship so it is only natural that such feelings as loyalty will manifest themselves.

Such things as subscriptions and owning a life time account certainly influence ones desire to play a specific MMO. In the past I’ve frequently kept playing games that I was no longer fully invested in, mainly because I felt an economic compulsion to do so. “I’ve paid for this, so I want my monies worth” is still a common refrain. The spending of money has a curious effect upon player perspectives, often keeping an individual doing something they no longer enjoy, just for the sake of some misplaced sense of fiscal prudence. One of the positive aspects of the free to play business model is that it can free us from this mindset if we so choose.

Then of course there are the twin blinkers of nostalgia and “the grass is always greener”; two of the strongest imperatives that drive gamers. I’ve lost track of how many times I’ve re-installed a game that I have previously abandoned purely because of the fond memories I associate with it. I returned to Rift recently to find that nothing had really changed since I last played it. There was plenty of new content but the mechanics were still the same. I’m not exactly sure what it was I expected to find, which segues nicely in to the “the grass is always greener” concept. I guess we all vaguely hope that the things we previously didn’t like have miraculously changed.

Although I’m not suggesting that we universally abandon all notions of MMO loyalty, I would certainly advocate tempering it. One of the things I’ve become more comfortable with as I’ve got older, is that it’s fine to stop doing something I’m not enjoying. If I don’t like a movie or a TV show, then I stop watching it. If a book is not sufficiently engaging me or I don’t care for the direction the plot is taking then I put it down. I never use to be able to do that. I guess that’s down to the traditional social conditioning that still prevails in Western culture. “Start what you finish” and “don’t be a quitter” being the usual mantras that get bandied about. However gaming is about leisure time and fun, not obligation or loyalty. If you are going to do something, then do it for the right reasons. If you have lost sight of why you’re doing something, then maybe it’s time to stop.

Roger Edwards 10/8/15 Roger Edwards 10/8/15

Gaming and Unemployment

During my working life the job market has changed substantially. The concept of a job for life has been seriously eroded as has the sense of job stability. At present in the UK it is still very much an “employers market” and recruitment is definitely conducted on their terms. Periods of unemployment have therefore become increasingly common in comparison to my parent’s generation. I personally have endured times when contracts where not forthcoming and recollect 2009 and 2010 being particularly tough years. Although looking for work fills a lot of the time when unemployed, there is still a substantial void to fill. Unemployment also leaves you without a daily routine and clearly any defined goal to achieve. It is therefore not surprising that so many people fill these gaps by turning to gaming.

This post is not about those who do not to work and simply spend their time gaming through personal choice. Such people are a minority and should not define the debate over unemployment. Unemployment per se is a subject that has been hijacked in recent years and is now about blame, judgement and shame. The discussion needs to be far more intellectually and emotionally sophisticated than that. I am more interested in exploring how many who are out of work, after searching diligently for gainful employment, still find that they have a lot of time to fill without the daily routine of a job. It is worth considering exactly how much impact your job has upon your daily life, beyond the obvious fact that it pays the bills.

Over the years I’ve became aware how many writers, podcasters and live streamers mention that they are between jobs and that gaming has become a major aspect of their lifestyle as a result. Setting aside crass knee-jerk arguments such as “why are you wasting your time gaming, when you don’t have a job”, it has made me consider exactly what is the allure gaming during periods of unemployment and the potential benefits. Naturally I’ve drawn upon my own experiences of periods of unemployment and reflected upon how I spent my own time when not looking for work. I believe my conclusions are far from unique to me.

Gaming, especially MMOs, offer an interactive experience that is centred on goals and achievements. If you then take this a stage further and you blog, podcast or livestream about your gaming, then you have a further set of tasks to manage such as writing, publishing and communicating. It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to conclude that the games are supplying a degree of personal fulfilment, structure and self-discipline, in lieu of that gained from employment. This is a positive thing because unemployment has a terrible habit of leeching away self-worth and motivation. Gaming can offer challenges and impose a sense of order upon the day, similar to that of the working environment.

Being unemployed definitely has a tangible impact upon your social life. This often goes beyond the lack of money. The stigma of being jobless can also have an effect on friendships. It is not uncommon to find that after a lengthy period of unemployment that friends have either drifted away or actively ditched you, leaving you isolated. Gaming can offer a vital social lifeline and provide interaction, inclusion and an opportunity for genuine new friendships. Unemployed people sometimes find themselves exclusively in the company of others in a similar position. Although this can be supportive, it can also foster and reinforce a sense of negativity and despair. Therefore cultivating new friendships online via gaming can be a very positive and beneficial experience.

Many of the spinoff activities from gaming such as blogging, podcasting and livestreaming present a valuable opportunity in self-improvement. They can lead to learning new technical and writing skills, many of which are transferrable. Maintaining a forum or guild requires a lot of man management and “soft” skills. These can potentially be placed on a resume to illustrate the constructive use of time during a period without work. However there’s been a propensity of late towards inflated claims about gaming. Some seem to think that gamers are lateral thinking, problem solving savants. This is patently not the case as some time spent on a forums or world chat will succinctly verify. However this is not to say that gaming and its wider associated culture does not offer any positive benefits that can’t be quantified.

Now there are dangers associated with gaming during periods of unemployment. For some there is the risk that gaming itself becomes a surrogate job, in so far that it becomes the driving factor of the day. Patently this is not a good thing if it keeps you from finding the gainful employment you require. Having lots of spare time can lead to over indulgence. The structured hours that comes with most jobs bring simply cannot compete with this. Giving up ones indulgences can be hard to do and some people cannot or will not do it. Yet I feel such cases are a minority and most responsible gamers understand the restrictions and trade-off’s that employment demands.

Gaming is a useful support tool to the long term unemployed. It can be argued that the same benefits are applicable to several other groups of society; the disabled, the introverted and the agoraphobic. It also has the benefit of being an economical pastime, with F2P games offering a variety of options at no cost. As long as gaming not impeded the actual search for a job, then I believe it can be a positive force and influence during what is usually a very difficult period of someone’s life. However convincing an employer of such is another matter and prejudice and entrenched views are still common place. Therefore I would recommend exercising caution as to what you do and do not state in your resume.

Roger Edwards 10/6/15 Roger Edwards 10/6/15

MMO Economies

One of the greatest assets of Star Trek Online is its single shard server technology. Not only does this foster a great sense of community but it provides several logistical benefits. The most practical of these is the in-game auction house known as the Exchange, which due to the games server structure offers a universal and comprehensive market place. If it can be sold within the game then it’s usually available on the Exchange. Like any market it is driven by supply and demand and fluctuates accordingly. The Delta Recruitment event in May saw a rise in both the availability and price of low level items. The recent announcement regarding the Admiralty system has seen the prices of Mirror Universe ships increase tenfold.

Although Guild Wars 2 launched with regional and game specific servers, the Black Lion Trading Company has always been across all worlds, providing yet another well stocked virtual market place. One of the most convenient touches that ArenaNet added to the game is the ability to access the auction house anywhere in Tyria. If a player is not near a Black Lion Trader NPC then the auction house can be simply be reached via the GUI. There is a minor caveat that transactions carried out this way require you to collect your gold direct from the nearest Black Lion Trader. However the game regularly drops tokens that can summon a Black Lion Trader directly to your location, therefore bypassing this minor inconvenience.

This progressive approach to auction houses and in-game economy is sorely missed when playing older titles such as LOTRO. The auction house system is server specific and very much reflects the current state of the game population. It is not unusual to find the auction house bereft of any significant gear at lower levels. Those that regularly play through old content either recycle gear or craft what they need as they proceed through the game. Therefore casual players will often find themselves reliant on quest rewards for their gear requirements. There are alternative options such as bartering skirmish tokens but farming such currency may not be deemed as casual friendly. Hopefully the ongoing server consolidations will result in more robust in-game economies.

Despite not being a World of Warcraft player I do envy the fact that the games auction house can be accessed remotely via mobile devices. Engaging players when they are out of game is a wise policy. Accessing the economy via an app keeps gamers involved and has obvious practical benefit. I have often played various MMO’s economies as a game in itself. When LOTRO use to have a thriving raiding culture I would often stockpile potions and other useful items, only to sell them at a higher price late on a Friday and Saturday evening, when they were in great demand. Lock boxes in STO have also proven to be a good long term investment. Remote access to both these markets would be beneficial.

I’ve often found gaming economies compelling because of the interesting effect upon the player base. It is fascinating to see different people’s reactions to the auction house system. As ever with gaming many players bring their own moral and ethical baggage along with them when they enter virtual worlds. I have been upbraided in the past by other LOTRO players for the item speculation I described earlier. I have also seen arguments start in MMOs over undercutting item prices on auction house. There are even some players who balk at the notion of selling crafted gear and loot drops, wishing to impose their own in-game work ethic upon others.

Auction houses can also be a useful barometer as to the health of a game. An active player population usually means a buoyant economy with essential items being readily available. Ageing MMOs tend to suffer from a lack of resources being traded. In such cases the only real solutions are to either consolidate servers to increase populations or to adjust the auction mechanics to allow cross server access. The latter is often too complex and expensive to implement. Bearing all this in mind, if I do decide to try any new MMOs in future, they’ll need to have a robust and accessible economy to secure my custom.

Roger Edwards 10/4/15 Roger Edwards 10/4/15

LOTRO Update 17 Beta

Since the launch of Update 16 in May this year, I and many other LOTRO players have been standing on the cliffs of South Ithilien, looking across the River Anduin to Minas Tirith. It’s been a long and hard journey over the last eight years but finally players will be able to visit that iconic city in Update 17. At present a beta build is available on the Bullroarer test server, so I spent several hours over the weekend exploring the Pelennor Fields and the surrounding area known as Old Anorien. The city itself has numerous placeholder NPCs and it is clear that some textures and additional details are missing from the environment. However the essential layout and design of Minas Tirith is obviously set and as ever Turbine have done an interesting job interpreting Tolkien’s source text.

The Tower of the Guard is accessed by a breach in the Rammas Echor at Harland. As I initially rode across the Pelennor Fields, I was at first impressed with the design and imposing nature of the White City. However upon reflection I think my reaction was mainly due to the iconic nature of Minas Tirith and its size. Once I entered the main gate it became very clear that Turbine have used standard Gondorian assets. I appreciate that there is an architectural style to be maintained but the streets are identical to those of Pelargir and Dol Amroth and devoid of anything distinctive. The same statues, Swan Wing embellishment and Númenórean faces adorn all structures. After a short time Minas Tirith becomes terribly familiar.

The journey through winding streets and the seven levels to the citadel becomes tiresome once the novelty of its initial completion wears off. I sincerely hope Turbine includes a quick travel system of some kind, especially in light of their penchant for fetch quests. The court yard of the fountain and white tree is adequate but the terrace set on top of the bastion of stone is somewhat bare and lacklustre. I took some comfort in riding off the edge but sadly there was no deed for such a foolhardy act as there has been in the past. Perhaps further embellishments will be added to Minas Tirith during the course of the beta testing. As is stands it’s more monumental than functional.

North of The Pelennor Fields is the region of Talath Anor. This includes the settlement of Crithost and Cair Andos. Again these areas are far from unique and are simply adequate. There are both roaming Orcs and mounted foes scattered throughout the new area. Stables are few and far between as are resurrection circles. At the Northern point on the map is the ubiquitous blocked bridge which leads to The Beacon Marches. It if from this direction the Rohirrim rode to Gondor’s aid.

Turbine have established a pattern since they moved away from paid expansions to free updates and Old Anorien seems to very much stick to it. I do not doubt there will be yet more rep factions and more daily repeatables. Minas Tirith will also feature more Epic Battles which doesn’t fill me with delight. Yet this sort of content seems to be keeping the faithful engaged and frankly I don’t think Turbine have the resources or the will do anything radically different at this stage in the games lifecycle. In a nutshell LOTRO’s future is simply more of the same. Content will meet a standard but nothing more. Therefore players will have to content themselves with variations on a theme. Those seeking more will have to rely upon emergent gameplay.

Roger Edwards 9/29/15 Roger Edwards 9/29/15

LOTRO World Transfers

This evening I successfully transferred my two primary LOTRO characters from Gilrain server to Laurelin. The process was intuitive and took about an hour in total. Considering this was mid-evening and therefore UK gaming primetime, I thought this to be an acceptable timeframe. I had no issues with any of the contents of my personal bags or vault and was refunded all the rent that I had paid in advance for my house. I took the opportunity brought about by the move to downsize to a smaller in-game property. I was please to find that the migration of my kinship was proceeding well with many other familiar faces arriving on Laurelin during the course of the evening. So from my point of view this migration was far from a difficult experience.

The world transfers are a necessity and I have had no issue reconciling myself to this. I not an unduly sentimental person, so leaving Gilrain was simply a matter of logistics for me. Laurelin despite being an English RP server seems like a suitable home for my kinship. We mainly tend to have lore friendly names and are mindful of the needs of those who role play. I think we should have no issue settling in to our new virtual home. The benefits of a server with a higher population are already abundant. There is a healthy economy on Laurelin and prices seem to be far more reasonable than usual. It would appear the community is resistant to the concept of hyperinflation. The various chat channels throughout the game seem active and the atmosphere is far from unfriendly.

However despite my broadly positive experience, I have found threads on both the official and unofficial LOTRO forums that refer to alleged complaints about the influx of new players to Laurelin. There are also criticisms from those who have had to rename their characters due to RP TOS violations. Having spent some time in world chat and talking with both new and established denizens of Laurelin, it would seem that there are just a handful of individuals that are unhappy with the status quo. Some may be justified in their protestations, others not so. Either way it is not accurate reflection of the overall community on the server who seem to be adapting to the influx of new players.

As I get older I do find this predilection for drama from certain quarters rather tedious and it actively contributes to me further distancing from the gaming community. As for LOTRO its future seems to be somewhat unsurprising. The recent Player Council leak confirms that we shall continue to get more of the same and that there are no real surprises or radical changes to come in the immediate future. Therefore I am happy to play new content as and when it is released and to take pleasure in what the game can currently provide, rather than focus on what could be. LOTRO is in its autumn years and a more existential approach to the game seems prudent.

Roger Edwards 9/24/15 Roger Edwards 9/24/15

The Enduring Appeal of Mario Kart

One of the best games I have ever played is Super Mario Kart. It simply embodies all those elements that make Nintendo titles so great. It is a polished product with a cheerful aesthetic that is eminently playable. It has exactly the right balance between skill and random chance resulting in a fun and compelling game. No two races are ever the same. It is one of the few titles that I have literally played all night with friends. I still smart over the “incident” where someone stole my feather just as I was about to jump across the shortcut on the Ghost Valley 1 track (this will make perfect sense to those who have played the game).

Due to the game’s inherent appeal, there has been a further seven incarnations of Mario Kart. All have proven to be bestsellers. Despite Nintendo’s ongoing financial difficulties, last year’s release of Mario Kart 8 was a welcome shot in the arm for the ailing games company. Sales have reached 2 million copies in the US alone since its May release. The title has also been beneficial for sales of the ailing Wii U, a console that until recently had been effectively written off by many in the gaming industry. Furthermore Mario Kart 8 attracted “strongest review scores in franchise history,” according to the company.

So what exactly are the reasons behind the enduring appeal of Mario Kart? Obviously the accessible and well-conceived game mechanics are a big factor. Each new version of the game maintains the balance between refining old ideas while introducing fresh new ones. The pleasant graphics with their stylised cartoon aesthetic along with the playful soundtrack broadens its appeal to all age groups. The game also lacks the male-centric philosophy that is associated with so many driving and racing franchises. Perhaps the most important quality present in all versions of Mario Kart is the “fun factor”. It’s something Nintendo has always inherently. It’s the reason why I still play Super Mario Kart today, via an emulator on my PC and tablet.

Roger Edwards 9/22/15 Roger Edwards 9/22/15

Gold Sellers

Having returned to several MMOs recently, I have been surprised to see that gold selling is still quite common place. Purveyors of these and other dubious services still regularly spam the in-game chat channels of games such as Star Trek Online and Guild Wars 2. I would hazard a guess that games based on single server environments amplify the hawking of such wares. I have not seen such messages on the Gilrain server where I play LOTRO for several years. However it is clear that gold selling is still a “thing” within this genre, irrespective of my surprise.

One of the commonest issues facing a new player of MMO, is a shortfall of in-game gold. There are game mechanics in place in most games of this genre that allow you to legitimately amass a sizeable personal fortune but they require time. Therein lies the problem. Long term players at endgame frequently have a substantial supply of gold that ceases to have any major benefit for them. Gold is often most required midway through the levelling process. Having recently returned to both STO and Guild Wars 2, I’ve found that I am spending the respective in-game currency on upgraded gear as fast as I earn it.

Now this is exactly the sort of scenario that could potentially encourage some players to use the services of a gold seller. Let us not waste time on any moral debates about such vendors; that is another blog post all together. I and many other people have used gold sellers in the past as a convenient means to an end. However with the advent of free to play games and the common practise of using multiple in-game currencies, surely the financial benefits of using gold sellers has fallen by the wayside? Simply put, are such services value for money?

Let us use STO as an example. Perfect World sells Zen for use in the C-Store, where players can by ships, commodities, buffs and boost and all the usual trinkets and baubles you find in a MMO. Recently I bought 5300 Zen for £32 (€45, $49). I then spent 5250 Zen buying 46 lock box keys (4 x pack of 10 and 6 individual keys). At the time keys were selling on the in-game exchange for 2.6 million Energy Credits. Within one hour of posting the keys they had all sold for a total of119,600,00 Energy Credits. This may sound like a lot but high end items can sell for 10 to 15 million Energy Credits or more. However if spent prudently this is a reasonable war chest for a new player.

So to summarise, I effectively spent £32 for nearly 120 million energy credits, using legitimate game processes. However a Google search not only yields the names of the most popular gold sellers online but also lists a gold selling comparison site. MMOBux provides quite a comprehensive service, with reviews of gold sellers and price tracking. It’s both mind boggling and yet perfectly logical that site such as this should exist. Using the comparison site I determined at the time that MMOGA could source 120 million Energy Credits for £27 where Koala Credits could supply the required amount for £93.

It would appear that it is more cost effective and safer to buy in-game currency in STO via Perfect World, rather than take your chances with these third party vendors. It’s a similar story with Guild Wars 2 as they allows players to purchase gems and convert them directly in-game into gold, via a server wide exchange mechanism. At present you can safely buy in-game, 2800 gems for £30 and convert them to 532 gold. Again the third party gold sellers cannot really undercut the official tariff and therefore can only offer an equivalent price.

So based on these two examples, why is gold selling still a “thing” in the MMO genre? Why would anyone be willing to risk losing their currency order, just for a negligible saving (and assuming there is one)? It’s an interesting question because obviously people still use these dubious services as my Google search showed. I think like most questions the answer is complex rather than binary. I get the impression that a lot of players haven’t stopped and done the maths, so don’t realise they can get in-game gold legitimately and without risk. I also think that gold selling advertising is a bit like supermarket special offers. When you actually crunch the numbers there isn't actually a deal to be had but you are distinctly given the impression that there is one. Also third party gold sellers probably don’t care too much about whether the customer is actually the owner of the credit card being used.

As there is no significant advantage to buying gold from third party outlets, you would think that players would prefer to use the legitimate services associated with many games. MMOs have operating costs so spending money directly via the developers helps support the game and its future growth. Gold sellers drain money from this revenue stream which is ultimately damaging, not only for the game but for the player as well. All things considered there shouldn't really be any reason why gold selling is still a “thing” in 2015. Perhaps if more players took time out to consider the matter, such services would become obsolete.